Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357864 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #405 on: September 21, 2020, 08:58:02 PM »
Apart from them being suspects in their childs dissapearence

Seems most of the british opinion is that they are not cleared.

The CB scenario gets sillier by the day.



Be cautious of new McCann ‘evidence’ until charges are made, Professor warns



But I should say that we need to be cautious because there is clearly no conclusive forensic scientific or DNA evidence that places Madeleine in either of his two vehicles that we've heard about, otherwise this man – Christian B – would have already been charged.

“The difference between the approach taken by Scotland Yard and the German prosecutor is striking. For the German authorities to say that they have evidence that Madeleine is dead whilst also admitting that they do not have a body and may not be able to charge the suspect, is both very curious and unusual, and so has re-awakened media interest in a case which may never be solved.”



https://www.beds.ac.uk/news/2020/june/be-cautious-of-new-mccann-evidence-until-charges-are-made-professor-warns/

Professor Silverman certainly does hit the nail on the head and seems to know what he's talking about as a man of great compassion and insight

Snip
When asked why a conclusion is so important for the McCann family, whether or not someone is charged and convicted, Silverman said: “While it's impossible for most of us to put ourselves in the position of Kate and Gerry McCann, the not knowing aspect of this case must be absolutely appalling and every time the story resurfaces in the media it raises hope and then triggers the awful realisation that their child may be dead, so there's all sorts of emotional aspects to this.

“It's not just a journalist’s story, it’s an extraordinary human tragedy, whatever we discover in the end.”

https://www.beds.ac.uk/news/2020/june/be-cautious-of-new-mccann-evidence-until-charges-are-made-professor-warns/

In my opinion a very succinct and timely reminder of the real people with real lives and the very real trauma they live with every day of their lives with no choice in the matter.  Worth sparing a thought for them much as the professor has.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #406 on: September 21, 2020, 09:09:45 PM »
Professor Silverman certainly does hit the nail on the head and seems to know what he's talking about as a man of great compassion and insight

Snip
When asked why a conclusion is so important for the McCann family, whether or not someone is charged and convicted, Silverman said: “While it's impossible for most of us to put ourselves in the position of Kate and Gerry McCann, the not knowing aspect of this case must be absolutely appalling and every time the story resurfaces in the media it raises hope and then triggers the awful realisation that their child may be dead, so there's all sorts of emotional aspects to this.

“It's not just a journalist’s story, it’s an extraordinary human tragedy, whatever we discover in the end.”

https://www.beds.ac.uk/news/2020/june/be-cautious-of-new-mccann-evidence-until-charges-are-made-professor-warns/

In my opinion a very succinct and timely reminder of the real people with real lives and the very real trauma they live with every day of their lives with no choice in the matter.  Worth sparing a thought for them much as the professor has.
At the moment there us no conclusive evidence in the public arena... That may change.  I think it's highly significant that HCW said he doesn't need forensic evidence... Enough circumstantial could be enough... It's becoming clearer that my prediction that CB will not be able to account for his movements... That he had no alibi.. Combined with other circumstantial evidence could be enough to convict

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #407 on: September 21, 2020, 10:08:11 PM »
The lawyer of the prime suspect in Madeleine McCann's abduction says people will 'fall off their chair' when he reveals new evidence which allegedly clears his client's name.

Convicted paedophile Christian Brueckner, 43, was accused by German police earlier this year of kidnapping the three-year-old in Portugal in 2007.

However his lawyer, Friedrich Fulscher, insists he is innocent. Mr Fulscher claims that an anonymous source has provided 'vital information' which will make Brits 'fall off their chair'.

He told The Sun: 'I cannot go into details but it is very significant and involves someone who has provided me with vital information.

'When I reveal it you will fall off your chair.'


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8757067/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckners-lawyer-says-evidence-clears-client.html
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #408 on: September 22, 2020, 02:43:49 PM »
Professor Silverman certainly does hit the nail on the head and seems to know what he's talking about as a man of great compassion and insight

Snip
When asked why a conclusion is so important for the McCann family, whether or not someone is charged and convicted, Silverman said: “While it's impossible for most of us to put ourselves in the position of Kate and Gerry McCann, the not knowing aspect of this case must be absolutely appalling and every time the story resurfaces in the media it raises hope and then triggers the awful realisation that their child may be dead, so there's all sorts of emotional aspects to this.

“It's not just a journalist’s story, it’s an extraordinary human tragedy, whatever we discover in the end.”

https://www.beds.ac.uk/news/2020/june/be-cautious-of-new-mccann-evidence-until-charges-are-made-professor-warns/

In my opinion a very succinct and timely reminder of the real people with real lives and the very real trauma they live with every day of their lives with no choice in the matter.  Worth sparing a thought for them much as the professor has.

In my opinion a very succinct and timely reminder of the real people with real lives and the very real trauma they live with every day of their lives

I think you will find a lot of casualties in this case becase of the mccs actions.

Not forgetting the bggest casualty of all ...Maddie.

Offline Admin

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #409 on: September 22, 2020, 03:48:39 PM »
Posters are reminded not to post opinion as fact. It is merely opinion that Madeleine McCann was abducted so please add the obligatory imo or refer to her as having disappeared.

Admin

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #410 on: September 22, 2020, 04:08:09 PM »
Posters are reminded not to post opinion as fact. It is merely opinion that Madeleine McCann was abducted so please add the obligatory imo or refer to her as having disappeared.

Admin
why do we have to do this when the police and the media do not?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #411 on: September 22, 2020, 04:36:46 PM »
why do we have to do this when the police and the media do not?

Because  I think it upsets some people that an abduction is looking to be very likely  and may soon be proven.. Imo

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #412 on: September 22, 2020, 04:47:14 PM »
Because  I think it upsets some people that an abduction is looking to be very likely  and may soon be proven.. Imo

Wonder what will happen to this forum, if abduction is proven and Amaral suddenly vanishes, withdrawing into his shell ?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #413 on: September 22, 2020, 04:53:52 PM »
Wonder what will happen to this forum, if abduction is proven and Amaral suddenly vanishes, withdrawing into his shell ?

As I've said.. Interesting  times ahead

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #414 on: September 22, 2020, 04:59:39 PM »
Because  I think it upsets some people that an abduction is looking to be very likely  and may soon be proven.. Imo

Maybe not as well. IMO

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #415 on: September 22, 2020, 05:06:14 PM »
Wonder what will happen to this forum, if abduction is proven and Amaral suddenly vanishes, withdrawing into his shell ?
I'll go back to the moderately popular Miniature Wizard Wargames Figurine Collector's forum. If Warlock Pendragon will accept me back after the incident in '03.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #416 on: September 22, 2020, 05:10:04 PM »
Wonder what will happen to this forum, if abduction is proven and Amaral suddenly vanishes, withdrawing into his shell ?
It will still be the same old same old, it’s just the conspiracy theories will ramp up a gear or two.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #417 on: September 22, 2020, 05:39:09 PM »
Wolters now says there is material evidence....its getting worse for his detractors

German prosecutors have claimed that there is material evidence that Madeleine McCann is dead.

Speaking to Portuguese broadcaster RTP on Tuesday, public prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters said investigators had evidence that the British girl who disappeared from a holiday resort in Portugal in 2007 had died.

When asked whether there was any material evidence that Madeleine, who was three years old when she disappeared, is dead, Mr Wolters replied: “Yes.”


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/madeleine-mccann-dead-missing-evidence-christian-brueckner-portugal-germany-b531320.html

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #418 on: September 22, 2020, 05:51:54 PM »
Wolters now says there is material evidence....its getting worse for his detractors

German prosecutors have claimed that there is material evidence that Madeleine McCann is dead.

Speaking to Portuguese broadcaster RTP on Tuesday, public prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters said investigators had evidence that the British girl who disappeared from a holiday resort in Portugal in 2007 had died.

When asked whether there was any material evidence that Madeleine, who was three years old when she disappeared, is dead, Mr Wolters replied: “Yes.”


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/madeleine-mccann-dead-missing-evidence-christian-brueckner-portugal-germany-b531320.html

We know that dont we....the so called confession in a bar would be material evidence.

Whats happened to the concrete evidence.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #419 on: September 22, 2020, 06:00:12 PM »
We know that dont we....the so called confession in a bar would be material evidence.

Whats happened to the concrete evidence.

A statement isnt material evidence...material evidence is physical....such as an image on a memory stick