Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 358172 times)

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #480 on: September 23, 2020, 04:36:12 PM »
No, because going back to the original point ....he will be privy to the evidence of the rape.

He said there were no film of the rape

you an VS just seem to totally try an disrupt what points are being made at the time....now that is IMO

I think you will find we don't have  a reliable source as to what he said.

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #481 on: September 23, 2020, 06:38:15 PM »
I still find it interesting that none of Brückner’s former friends (the ones we know of) think that he had killed Madeleine. They state that he was capable of abducting a child and that he probably sold Madeleine. My opinion.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #482 on: September 23, 2020, 06:48:23 PM »
At one time I believe there was a considerable amount of reward money available for Madeleine.

Do you know of any money presently on offer which would encourage any of these guys to break cover and go public with all the ramifications they might attract from their peers as a result.

Yes 20 thousand offered by OG.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #483 on: September 23, 2020, 06:50:06 PM »
I still find it interesting that none of Brückner’s former friends (the ones we know of) think that he had killed Madeleine. They state that he was capable of abducting a child and that he probably sold Madeleine. My opinion.

If he did it doesn’t really make sense Wolter dragging his feet....what if she’s still alive and all.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #484 on: September 23, 2020, 06:52:50 PM »
Yes 20 thousand offered by OG.

Obviously they wont get it unless there is material/strong/concrete evidence to convict him...and if that happens they deserve every penny. That was the purpose of the reward...to encourage an informant. It was imo the only way the case would be solved and it looks like I was right

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #485 on: September 23, 2020, 06:53:42 PM »
If he did it doesn’t really make sense Wolter dragging his feet....what if she’s still alive and all.

Wolters says shes dead...so hes in no rush

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #486 on: September 23, 2020, 07:03:42 PM »
Please correct me if I’m mistaken, but I have not seen any direct words from Mr Wolters that Brückner is the person who removed Madeleine from her bed. German authorities do however insist that he was in the vicinity of the Ocean Club shortly before Madeleine’s disappearance. My opinion is that he possibly took Madeleine from the person/s who actually lifted her from her bed.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #487 on: September 23, 2020, 07:45:07 PM »
Please correct me if I’m mistaken, but I have not seen any direct words from Mr Wolters that Brückner is the person who removed Madeleine from her bed. German authorities do however insist that he was in the vicinity of the Ocean Club shortly before Madeleine’s disappearance. My opinion is that he possibly took Madeleine from the person/s who actually lifted her from her bed.

I agree Wolters has never said he thinks his suspect lifted madeleine out of 5a, there are other possibilities.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #488 on: September 23, 2020, 07:46:50 PM »
I agree Wolters has never said he thinks his suspect lifted madeleine out of 5a, there are other possibilities.

but he has said he has enough evidence to show CB killed Maddie

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #489 on: September 23, 2020, 07:48:10 PM »
I still find it interesting that none of Brückner’s former friends (the ones we know of) think that he had killed Madeleine. They state that he was capable of abducting a child and that he probably sold Madeleine. My opinion.

He added: “The result of our investigation does not point in any way to the possibility the suspect might have kept Madeleine alive.

“Everything we have points to her being dead.”

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12744071/madeleine-mccann-prosecutor-material-evidence-dead-christian-b/
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #490 on: September 23, 2020, 07:49:42 PM »
He added: “The result of our investigation does not point in any way to the possibility the suspect might have kept Madeleine alive.

“Everything we have points to her being dead.”

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12744071/madeleine-mccann-prosecutor-material-evidence-dead-christian-b/

and that CB killed her

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #491 on: September 23, 2020, 08:35:09 PM »
I agree Wolters has never said he thinks his suspect lifted madeleine out of 5a, there are other possibilities.
The German investigation may go full circle. My opinion. Excluding Madeleine’s parents and their vacation friends. Also my opinion.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #492 on: September 23, 2020, 09:07:26 PM »
In fairness, if there was a video, then there'd be little need for the hair follicle  / DNA analysis, apart from building a cast iron case.
There may be a video, there may not, I dunno......actually who said there was a video? Does it matter? Does anyone here care? Who did say there was a video, though? Was it in the initial or subsequent trial? Does anyone care about that?

Seyferth, along with another pal Helge Busching, was the key witness in Christian's rape trial in Braunschweig, Germany, last December.

Christian was convicted of attacking a 72-year-old woman in her own home at Praia da Luz in 2005.

The two men nailed him after finding a horrific video in Christian's Portuguese apartment that showed him torturing and then raping the elderly American woman.

Other footage was said to show a young teenage girl tied to a wooden post as she begged for help while he sexually abused her.

We revealed last week that Busching was the key witness to the recent developments after telling cops Christian had confessed to him about taking Madeleine.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12700747/the-climber-christian-b-took-maddie/

It has now been revealed that a man named Helge Busching originally gave Christian B’s name to British police back in 2017.

Mr Busching claimed that Christian B told him in 2008 that he was involved in Madeliene’s disappearance in Praia da Luz the year prior.

British police were made aware of the claim after Mr Busching was arrested in Greece and he said that he wanted to speak to detectives.

He had been arrested in relation to smuggling of migrants between Greece and Italy.
https://extra.ie/2020/09/11/news/real-life/madeleine-mccann-suspect-jail
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #493 on: September 23, 2020, 09:19:53 PM »
Seyferth, along with another pal Helge Busching, was the key witness in Christian's rape trial in Braunschweig, Germany, last December.

Christian was convicted of attacking a 72-year-old woman in her own home at Praia da Luz in 2005.

The two men nailed him after finding a horrific video in Christian's Portuguese apartment that showed him torturing and then raping the elderly American woman.

Other footage was said to show a young teenage girl tied to a wooden post as she begged for help while he sexually abused her.

We revealed last week that Busching was the key witness to the recent developments after telling cops Christian had confessed to him about taking Madeleine.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12700747/the-climber-christian-b-took-maddie/

It has now been revealed that a man named Helge Busching originally gave Christian B’s name to British police back in 2017.

Mr Busching claimed that Christian B told him in 2008 that he was involved in Madeliene’s disappearance in Praia da Luz the year prior.

British police were made aware of the claim after Mr Busching was arrested in Greece and he said that he wanted to speak to detectives.

He had been arrested in relation to smuggling of migrants between Greece and Italy.
https://extra.ie/2020/09/11/news/real-life/madeleine-mccann-suspect-jail

As I've already explained it will be the material/concrete and other circumstantial evidence will potentially convict CB.... It was always going to be an informer that helped solve the case imo

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #494 on: September 23, 2020, 11:56:44 PM »
Obviously they wont get it unless there is material/strong/concrete evidence to convict him...and if that happens they deserve every penny. That was the purpose of the reward...to encourage an informant. It was imo the only way the case would be solved and it looks like I was right

The world loves a trier.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?