Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[The General]

Reuters is global but have to admit I'm not sure if the Timbuktu Times is affiliated

They're not run by Lex Luther. Just stop making wild, wholly inaccurate statements. I don't, not anymore.....hang on.....this is one.....D'OH!

[kizzy]

What the police woman said, was offensive and liable to bring the force into disrepute... It's called professional  ethics.

Papers can print the truth... But not lies... So what's their problem

Yet in 13 years not one negative story from friends of the mccanns in the papers

The point was who is going to dare risk saying anything bad about them, IMO no one.

.


The Avon and Somerset cop had posted on Facebook: “I need a holiday so much, I’d be willing to go away with the McCanns at this point.”

[kizzy]

Precisely... Most informants are fellow criminals... But that hasn't dawned on some yet

It doesn't seem to have dawned on fulscher

Well lets see if it has dawned on HCW ...as its seems what he has ....is not a lot

Brueckner had been living nearby at the time of Madeleine's disappearance and telephone data suggests he was near the apartment just hours before she was last seen.

But authorities say they do not have enough evidence to hold him in prison on the strength of the McCann case alone.

British police are still treating her disappearance as a missing persons case.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8767567/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-bid-jail-rejected.html

[Mr Gray]

Yet in 13 years not one negative story from friends of the mccanns in the papers

The point was who is going to dare risk saying anything bad about them, IMO no one.

.


The Avon and Somerset cop had posted on Facebook: “I need a holiday so much, I’d be willing to go away with the McCanns at this point.”

that was an appalling comment made on social media by  apolicewoman...shes lucky to keep her job imo.


Making  a joke about an ongoing investigation into a child who may well have been murdered by a paedophile is totally unacteptable from a public servant shared to her FB page. You obviously know little about professional ethics

[Brietta]

Oh D ...what newspaper would dare print them if they did.

Even comments on most media reports are censored.

Look how the policewoman nearly got the sack for a comment made on FB about the mccs.

Free speech is well out the window where the mccs are concerned as u know..they have well made sure of that.

IMO

I would hope that any police service worth its salt would take a very serious view of a police officer making unprofessionally flippant public comment on a social media outlet concerning an ongoing criminal process.

Sharing an ill-advised joke about the family of Madeleine McCann (who are all the victims of crime) on social media breaking the Code of Ethics and the standards which reflect public expectation on how those in policing should behave.

There are standards to be met by public servants and quite obviously the police officer breached them. She would have been in breech whoever her inappropriate levity was aimed at whether the McCann family or any other victims of crime she chose to joke about on a public platform.

[Mr Gray]

Well lets see if it has dawned on HCW ...as its seems what he has ....is not a lot

Brueckner had been living nearby at the time of Madeleine's disappearance and telephone data suggests he was near the apartment just hours before she was last seen.

But authorities say they do not have enough evidence to hold him in prison on the strength of the McCann case alone.

British police are still treating her disappearance as a missing persons case.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8767567/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-bid-jail-rejected.html

You are quoting a newspaer again...not HCW. IMO had CB been released he may well have been questioned and charged.

SY are treating it as  a missing persons enquiry because the Germans have not shared their evidence of death...its quite simple

[kizzy]

I would hope that any police service worth its salt would take a very serious view of a police officer making unprofessionally flippant public comment on a social media outlet concerning an ongoing criminal process.

Sharing an ill-advised joke about the family of Madeleine McCann (who are all the victims of crime) on social media breaking the Code of Ethics and the standards which reflect public expectation on how those in policing should behave.

There are standards to be met by public servants and quite obviously the police officer breached them. She would have been in breech whoever her inappropriate levity was aimed at whether the McCann family or any other victims of crime she chose to joke about on a public platform.

So as your reaction in your post is why IMO, as D said, is the reason[that was my point in the first place]

Yet in 13 years not one negative story from friends of the mccanns in the papers

Is not proof that there isn't anyone who has a bad word to say about the mccs.

Its just it seems the media would not dare print it.

[Mr Gray]

So as your reaction in your post is why IMO, as D said, is the reason[that was my point in the first place]

Yet in 13 years not one negative story from friends of the mccanns in the papers

Is not proof that there isn't anyone who has a bad word to say about the mccs.

Its just it seems the media would not dare print it.

just your opinion... Imo the media would be more than happy to print anyrthing thats true...they are protected by law. What they cannot print is gossip....like much taht is posted here

[kizzy]

You are quoting a newspaer again...not HCW. IMO had CB been released he may well have been questioned and charged.

SY are treating it as  a missing persons enquiry because the Germans have not shared their evidence of death...its quite simple

Not simple at all ...I believe the paper is quoting now exactly what the germans have ...nothing apart from the phone ping...[could be they are being careful now].

Why would they question him and charge him as in your opinion when the germans have said.


But authorities say they do not have enough evidence to hold him in prison on the strength of the McCann case alone.

[Mr Gray]

Not simple at all ...I believe the paper is quoting now exactly what the germans have ...nothing apart from the phone ping...[could be they are being careful now].

Why would they question him and charge him as in your opinion when the germans have said.


But authorities say they do not have enough evidence to hold him in prison on the strength of the McCann case alone.

what authorities...you are quoting a newspaper...total bull...imo.

without  a name and a direct quote its meaningless

[The General]

that was an appalling comment made on social media by  apolicewoman...shes lucky to keep her job imo.


Making  a joke about an ongoing investigation into a child who may well have been murdered by a paedophile is totally unacteptable from a public servant shared to her FB page. You obviously know little about professional ethics

Yours,

Disgruntled, Wolverhampton.

[Mr Gray]

Yours,

Disgruntled, Wolverhampton.

Whats all this about wolverhampton that several posters have referred to

[kizzy]

what authorities...you are quoting a newspaper...total bull...imo.

without  a name and a direct quote its meaningless

Well if it was bull ...why not just ignor the post instead of constantly defending your opinion when that is all your posts are


HCW who it seems in your posts word has to gospel.

Yet is very selective what he says.and contradictive. he says he has material evidence but then says he cannot comment what thing they have....so best not comment on both.




Wolters is asked: "Do you have any material evidence that Madeleine is dead?" To which the prosecutor replies with "yes". The interviewer wants to go further and asks: “What evidence do you have of your death? Do you have a video? ”But Wolters weighs in, says:“ I can't comment on the things we have. ”

[The General]

Whats all this about wolverhampton that several posters have referred to

You referred to yourself as a 'mediocre dentist from Wolverhampton', IIRCAWASAC
Nuthin wrrung with bein frum Wulvuramtun, Davel. Don't diss your roots. Keep it real. REPREZENT the Wulveramtun Massive......rezpec

[Mr Gray]

Well if it was bull ...why not just ignor the post instead of constantly defending your opinion when that is all your posts are


HCW who it seems in your posts word has to gospel.

Yet is very selective what he says.and contradictive. he says he has material evidence but then says he cannot comment what thing they have....so best not comment on both.




Wolters is asked: "Do you have any material evidence that Madeleine is dead?" To which the prosecutor replies with "yes". The interviewer wants to go further and asks: “What evidence do you have of your death? Do you have a video? ”But Wolters weighs in, says:“ I can't comment on the things we have. ”

he has actually commneted quite alot about what they have. Hes been asked about quite  afew things and he s answerred directly......

re dna in the car
re clothes
re forensics
re body
etc

to all these he answers no...to ...are there images of maddie on the memory stick...he says he cannot answer.

Thats what makes me and others think the memory  stick is the material piece of evidence and  a crucial piece of evidence. So crucial taht you may have herad further memory sticks is one of the things they were looking for on the allotmnet dig. I think i'm pretty good at analysing evidence ...its one of the things I was taught at university and at post grad level since

We obviously dont agree....so best you believe what you want and i will beleive what I want,,...IMO we will know fairly soon