Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[carlymichelle]

https://news.sky.com/story/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-b-has-appeal-rejected-by-european-court-of-justice-12079663?fbclid=IwAR3d08TeznZ5h4M6xdSP1gfsqOq24CH0NJL4MdgfzwIh0BXSDtifNqYBnLY

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well, thats about right for you VS and D believe a convict, career criminal who would do anything for money.

Yet not the findings of the PJ officer career... police officer on the case..

I think you kinda missed the point but ....

[Vertigo Swirl]

The one who couldn't understand  the evidence

And who made a career out of it - for money.

[kizzy]

I think you kinda missed the point but ....

Ye well happens a lot on here.

The fact is though ....CB associates are no better than him ...yet are treated as credible witnesses.

[Mr Gray]

Ye well happens a lot on here.

The fact is though ....CB associates are no better than him ...yet are treated as credible witnesses.

Yet again.. His testimony by itself is worthless.. I agree with that... But is there more to go with it... That's the question

[Wonderfulspam]

Ah that old chestnut.  I take it you still view the Gaspar statement as highly significant then, despite the otherwise unblemished reputation of the “nipple twiddler”, whilst preferring not to mention at all the crimes of the current chief suspect?  Yes, that figures and amply demonstrates my point, thank you.
PS: in an emergency who would you turn to for help if the only choice was between DP or CB?

Brueckner, every time.

[kizzy]

Yet again.. His testimony by itself is worthless.. I agree with that... But is there more to go with it... That's the question

Well, obviously not .....thats the answer.

[kizzy]

https://news.sky.com/story/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-b-has-appeal-rejected-by-european-court-of-justice-12079663?fbclid=IwAR3d08TeznZ5h4M6xdSP1gfsqOq24CH0NJL4MdgfzwIh0BXSDtifNqYBnLY

A statement from the prosecutor said: "We are glad that the European Court shared our opinion. Now he wont be released from prison early, even if he gets his parole approved."

So IMO that could mean Job Done.

[Mr Gray]

Well, obviously not .....thats the answer.

Who says it isn't worthless by itself... Of course it is

By itself that statement is worthless

[Mr Gray]

A statement from the prosecutor said: "We are glad that the European Court shared our opinion. Now he wont be released from prison early, even if he gets his parole approved."

So IMO that could mean Job Done.

We will see if Wolters loses interest now as you have predicted ...we will see if you are right or wrong... I think it's clear you are, wrong

[Mr Gray]

Just to make it clear.. As Evidence... On it's own.. The statement by the convicted criminal has little evidential value  for all the reasons sceptics have stated. It is intelligence and that's all it really is.
Hope that doesn't come as a shock to sceptics here

[kizzy]

We will see if Wolters loses interest now as you have predicted ...we will see if you are right or wrong... I think it's clear you are, wrong

Well being the S A you are lets hope it isn't you who is wrong for credibility sake.

[Lace]

So anyway the reason Mrs Gaspar went to the police and told them that was because...?

She thought it was best to report what she 'thought'.    Though strangely it was only DP she was concerned about even though it was GM he was talking to,  wouldn't you be concerned about both?   In my opinion Mrs Gasper didn't have a clue what they were talking about,  she just jumped to conclusions when she saw what DP did.   Do you honestly believe they would be talking about anything sexual whilst she was sat between them?   Nothing has come of it.   Amaral has a way of stirring the pot.

[Mr Gray]

First Dr Gaspar may have simply been mistaken in her interpretation... That's the most likely scenario imo.
Secondly she may have recently been on a, safeguarding course where the mantra is to report anything however small or unlikely... By not reporting she would be in breach of her of her professional  standards

[kizzy]

First Dr Gaspar may have simply been mistaken in her interpretation... That's the most likely scenario imo.
Secondly she may have recently been on a, safeguarding course where the mantra is to report anything however small or unlikely... By not reporting she would be in breach of her of her professional  standards

Thirdly she was disturbed enough to report it ...but it seemed to fall on deaf ears as usual IMO.

She obviously knew them so why would she get the wrong end of the stick...when she was sat there.

She probably knew what the conversation was about......whatever it disturbed her enough to report it.

Also doctors. ...Payne was the last indepenant witness also....disturbing imo.



The accusations were brought by a couple of friends that spent their holidays with part of the group in the summer of 2005 – themselves also English doctors.


http://madeleinemccann.org/blog/2008/07/19/payne-suspected-of-paedophilia/