Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357567 times)

0 Members and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #615 on: September 25, 2020, 05:13:04 PM »
Yep. I would.
Same as I'd rather my entire family die of heart disease than be treated by Gerry.
Cool
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #616 on: September 25, 2020, 05:15:07 PM »
Well lets hope your family have a say in how they are treated and by whom and not you.
Let Spam (and his family if they're anything like him) demonstrate Darwin's theory.  A bit like people who refuse life-saving treatment because of their religious beliefs.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #617 on: September 25, 2020, 05:45:23 PM »
Why do you find it disturbing.

He called in to see if Kate was ok as instructed by Gerry,  went to his apartment collected his tennis things and went to play tennis.

Kate said he was there for 30 seconds. Gerry said he was gone for 30 minutes. Nothing to see here move on. In your dreams.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2020, 05:47:30 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #618 on: September 25, 2020, 06:13:42 PM »
Kate said he was there for 30 seconds. Gerry said he was gone for 30 minutes. Nothing to see here move on. In your dreams.
Ah, so are those the 30 minutes in which DP and KMcC were busy doing away with Madeleine in your view?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #619 on: September 25, 2020, 07:44:24 PM »
Do you know what they were doing?
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #620 on: September 25, 2020, 08:41:05 PM »
You as well, I presume.  Now there's a thought.
I suppose stranger things have happened.  So don't lose hope.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #621 on: September 25, 2020, 08:43:26 PM »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #622 on: September 25, 2020, 09:24:20 PM »
Yes.

 @)(++(*

"I read carefully the written document/questionnaire provided by David Payne."
but was not able to extricate any other information besides what is already known. He declares that he saw Madeleine, for the last time, at 17H00 on 3/5/07 in the McCann apartment. Also present there were Kate and Gerry. He did not indicate the motive for being there or what he was doing. He also cannot indicate how long he stayed.


https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATERINA-PAYNE-INCIDENT.htm
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #623 on: September 25, 2020, 09:26:52 PM »
@)(++(*

"I read carefully the written document/questionnaire provided by David Payne."
but was not able to extricate any other information besides what is already known. He declares that he saw Madeleine, for the last time, at 17H00 on 3/5/07 in the McCann apartment. Also present there were Kate and Gerry. He did not indicate the motive for being there or what he was doing. He also cannot indicate how long he stayed.


https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATERINA-PAYNE-INCIDENT.htm

It would be interesting to see that questionnaire.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #624 on: September 25, 2020, 09:46:08 PM »
@)(++(*

"I read carefully the written document/questionnaire provided by David Payne."
but was not able to extricate any other information besides what is already known. He declares that he saw Madeleine, for the last time, at 17H00 on 3/5/07 in the McCann apartment. Also present there were Kate and Gerry. He did not indicate the motive for being there or what he was doing. He also cannot indicate how long he stayed.


https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATERINA-PAYNE-INCIDENT.htm
So you know what was really going on do you?  @)(++(*
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #625 on: September 27, 2020, 01:12:28 PM »
So you know what was really going on do you?  @)(++(*

The fact is strange how DP never sued the gaspers ....or did a thing about insinuating he was a pedo it seems.

Especially when he was the last independent witness to see Maddie....all happy and looking the perfect family.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #626 on: September 27, 2020, 01:17:59 PM »
The fact is strange how DP never sued the gaspers ....or did a thing about insinuating he was a pedo it seems.

Especially when he was the last independent witness to see Maddie....all happy and looking the perfect family.

if you knew anything about law you would realise he could not sue the Gaspers

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #627 on: September 27, 2020, 01:30:58 PM »
if you knew anything about law you would realise he could not sue the Gaspers
50% of the Gaspar statements made it clear that one of them thought there was nothing suspicious going on anyway. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #628 on: September 27, 2020, 01:41:51 PM »
The fact is strange how DP never sued the gaspers ....or did a thing about insinuating he was a pedo it seems.

Especially when he was the last independent witness to see Maddie....all happy and looking the perfect family.

Another point, Arul Gaspar said he wasn’t aware that Gerry and DP were talking about Madeleine, not that they weren’t. He was much further away from the protagonists than his wife so wasn’t in the best position to hear them.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #629 on: September 27, 2020, 01:49:03 PM »
Another point, Arul Gaspar said he wasn’t aware that Gerry and DP were talking about Madeleine, not that they weren’t. He was much further away from the protagonists than his wife so wasn’t in the best position to hear them.

You are making things up...I suggest you the check the statement