Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[faithlilly]

I wasn't there just going by what KG said ...who was close enough to see and hear what was done and said.

The thing is that Katerina would have to be lying, and lying in a missing child case, if what she claimed isn’t true. What kind of person would intentionally mislead the police when a child’s welfare is at stake ? Is that what supporters are accusing the doctor of because it certainly seems like that ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Some people are just so black and white that they don't seem able to process the possibility that witnesses put their own interpretation on events, with the possibility that things are misheard or misunderstood or misconstrued.  It doesn't mean that they are lying, just mistaken or unconsciously biased. 

[kizzy]

The thing is that Katerina would have to be lying, and lying in a missing child case, if what she claimed isn’t true. What kind of person would intentionally mislead the police when a child’s welfare is at stake ? Is that what supporters are accusing the doctor of because it certainly seems like that ?

Yes, it does seem like that

Always selective IMO who and who not to believe like in.

Gaspers friends of kmc from uni Doctor ...but not believable,yet imo would know mccs best

Tapas 7 acquaintances IIRC apart from DP. yet what they say is gospel even though I believe there are inconsistencies in what they said.   

[Mr Gray]

Yes, it does seem like that

Always selective IMO who and who not to believe like in.

Gaspers friends of kmc from uni Doctor ...but not believable,yet imo would know mccs best

Tapas 7 acquaintances IIRC apart from DP. yet what they say is gospel even though I believe there are inconsistencies in what they said.

I think she was mistaken... And I don't see how what she perceived to what was being referred to could possibly be true.

Do you really think they were referring to the sexual abuse of Maddie.... And..  We have not seen their actual signed statements

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes, it does seem like that

Always selective IMO who and who not to believe like in.

Gaspers friends of kmc from uni Doctor ...but not believable,yet imo would know mccs best

Tapas 7 acquaintances IIRC apart from DP. yet what they say is gospel even though I believe there are inconsistencies in what they said.

you don’t really understand what I’ve written do you?

[G-Unit]

I think she was mistaken... And I don't see how what she perceived to what was being referred to could possibly be true.

Do you really think they were referring to the sexual abuse of Maddie.... And..  We have not seen their actual signed statements

It took LP 5 months to share the Gasper statements with the PJ. It makes one wonder how many other statements didn't make it to the lead investigators.

[Mr Gray]

It took LP 5 months to share the Gasper statements with the PJ. It makes one wonder how many other statements didn't make it to the lead investigators.

Do you think it possible that Gery McCann was discussing the sexual abuse of his daughter in front of the Gaspars..


I think its impossible....I doubt you can answer the question...so


Do you think it possible that Gery McCann was discussing the sexual abuse of his daughter in front of the Gaspars..

[faithlilly]

Yes, it does seem like that

Always selective IMO who and who not to believe like in.

Gaspers friends of kmc from uni Doctor ...but not believable,yet imo would know mccs best

Tapas 7 acquaintances IIRC apart from DP. yet what they say is gospel even though I believe there are inconsistencies in what they said.

Katerina as a doctor would know the potential outcome of her actions. I’m sure if she wasn’t sure or felt she may have misconstrued the conversation then she wouldn’t have given a statement.

I’ve always found it strange that two professionals unknown to each other both reported doubts about DP.

I also find it surprising that while Katerina’s statement, a professional woman, is doubted the statements of Brueckner’s criminal accomplices are taken as gospel.

[faithlilly]

I think she was mistaken... And I don't see how what she perceived to what was being referred to could possibly be true.

Do you really think they were referring to the sexual abuse of Maddie.... And..  We have not seen their actual signed statements

I prefer to not read into what was a very bald statement.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So if these two men were talking about the sexual abuse of Madeleine how does that fit into the “accidental overdose and fall off the balcony” theory?  Because if the Gaspar statement is relevant to solving this case then it would mean something very sinister was going on, something like a paedophile ring on their holidays that turned to murder.  And they say we’re the sickos to believe that CB had something to do with it!!

[Mr Gray]

Katerina as a doctor would know the potential outcome of her actions. I’m sure if she wasn’t sure or felt she may have misconstrued the conversation then she wouldn’t have given a statement.

I’ve always found it strange that two professionals unknown to each other both reported doubts about DP.

I also find it surprising that while Katerina’s statement, a professional woman, is doubted the statements of Brueckner’s criminal accomplices are taken as gospel.

I think you totally misunderstand...as a professional katrina would have felt forced to mention it however unlikely the possibility

[faithlilly]

I think you totally misunderstand...as a professional katrina would have felt forced to mention it however unlikely the possibility

Absolute nonsense...and how do you explain two professionals both having doubts about DP ?

[Mr Gray]

Absolute nonsense...and how do you explain two professionals both having doubts about DP ?

it isnt nons3ense obviously you dont understand professional ethics. She would actually b eguilty of professional misconduct for not reporting it..


They didnt both agree

They allowed their daughter to be bathed by the alleged paedophile

They didnt once discuss the point together....if i thought afriend was  apossible paedophile I would certainly discuss it with my wife

we havent seen their actual statement

[Vertigo Swirl]

it isnt nons3ense obviously you dont understand professional ethics. She would actually b eguilty of professional misconduct for not reporting it..


They didnt both agree

They allowed their daughter to be bathed by the alleged paedophile

They didnt once discuss the point together....if i thought afriend was  apossible paedophile I would certainly discuss it with my wife

we havent seen their actual statement

It is also a complete nonsense to say that McCann supporters take the word of CB’s associates as gospel.  In fact I’d say that was another blatant propagandist’s lie.

[faithlilly]

it isnt nons3ense obviously you dont understand professional ethics. She would actually b eguilty of professional misconduct for not reporting it..


They didnt both agree

They allowed their daughter to be bathed by the alleged paedophile

They didnt once discuss the point together....if i thought afriend was  apossible paedophile I would certainly discuss it with my wife

we havent seen their actual statement

How would that work then ? If Katerina hadn’t given a statement about DP’s lewd behaviour who else would have told authorities?  I believe if the statement she gave had been proved to been made up she would have been in a damn sight more trouble professionally.

Yvonne Martin and Katerina Gaspar, both professional women, both had their doubts about DP.