Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 358127 times)

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #675 on: September 27, 2020, 07:38:43 PM »
I’d bet my house that DP knew nothing about his alleged check and visit to Kate until much, much later.

4th May;

In answer to our question, the interviewee states that during all the meals, he never went to his apartment or to any of the group's apartments, because he has an, "intercom," and the signal carries from the apartment to the restaurant.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/DAVID-PAYNE.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #676 on: September 27, 2020, 07:52:33 PM »
Anonymous Letter?  That doesn't sound very professional on the part of Yvonne Martin.

Katerina Gaspar was sitting between Gerry McCann and David Payne and she seriously thought they were talking about the sexual abuse of one of their daughters?

That’s exactly what she thought...and she was there.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #677 on: September 27, 2020, 07:54:28 PM »
4th May;

In answer to our question, the interviewee states that during all the meals, he never went to his apartment or to any of the group's apartments, because he has an, "intercom," and the signal carries from the apartment to the restaurant.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/DAVID-PAYNE.htm

Makes you wonder why Gerry claimed that DP had checked ? To implicate him more deeply perhaps ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #678 on: September 27, 2020, 07:54:56 PM »
That’s exactly what she thought...and she was there.

Perhaps she was hard of hearing.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #679 on: September 27, 2020, 08:01:00 PM »
Perhaps she was hard of hearing.
Go the whole hog - deaf, dumb and blind.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #680 on: September 27, 2020, 08:03:58 PM »
4th May;

In answer to our question, the interviewee states that during all the meals, he never went to his apartment or to any of the group's apartments, because he has an, "intercom," and the signal carries from the apartment to the restaurant.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/DAVID-PAYNE.htm
I don't think... In fact I'm sure... Those statements are not reliable.  Fortunately the McCanns made new ones and gave them to the PJ

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #681 on: September 27, 2020, 08:05:48 PM »
Go the whole hog - deaf, dumb and blind.

Mistaken will do.

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #682 on: September 27, 2020, 08:40:58 PM »
Why should she be mistaken ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #683 on: September 27, 2020, 08:44:54 PM »
Why should she be mistaken ?

Because two male Doctors simply do not talk across a female doctor in the process of discussing the sexual abuse of one of their daughters, especially when she has a young daughter of her own.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #684 on: September 27, 2020, 08:51:09 PM »
Because two male Doctors simply do not talk across a female doctor in the process of discussing the sexual abuse of one of their daughters, especially when she has a young daughter of her own.
And if they did and she heard it why did she not immediately inform the authorities?  As a GP she should have been deeply concerned for the interests of Madeleine and DP’s children.  Why wasn’t she?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #685 on: September 27, 2020, 08:51:14 PM »
In your opinion. You really have no idea what two doctors might talk about.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #686 on: September 27, 2020, 08:52:58 PM »
In your opinion. You really have no idea what two doctors might talk about.
We do.  We have KG’s statement.  What did these two doctors actually say that was so damning and why did she not go straight to the police or social services about it?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #687 on: September 27, 2020, 09:05:35 PM »
In your opinion. You really have no idea what two doctors might talk about.


Sexual Abuse of a young girl is a serious criminal offence, which leads me to wonder why she didn't report it immediately, making her an accessory, which is also a criminal offence.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #688 on: September 27, 2020, 09:21:09 PM »
Has anyone here seen the original Gaspar statement in english...without that there is no real debate

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #689 on: September 27, 2020, 09:28:02 PM »
Has anyone here seen the original Gaspar statement in english...without that there is no real debate

What little I remember of the statement I saw, it was a ramble of if, buts and maybes.
But was this not one of the statements taken in English, translated into Portuguese and then back into English?