Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357993 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1260 on: October 10, 2020, 01:32:55 PM »
To be honest, does anyone care ?

Not in the least,still the genie was out the bottle in 2014, was it ever put back in one wonders.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1261 on: October 10, 2020, 01:33:54 PM »
I've been waiting (in vain) for a translation via sceptic blogs on many issues.  Google Translate is good enough to give the gist of printed media but without subtitled translation of video I must confess to be at a loss for interviews and news.

Those who seek out obscure nuances which are unfriendly and biased towards the McCanns and hasten to translate and publish them in the interests of 'free speech' have not been providing translations in the way they do.

Interesting that free speech only seems to work when it is one version which is promoted.

In my opinion what we are witnessing at the moment are demonstrations of mindsets which cannot progress with the times.  Exactly the same 'evidence' used by Amaral is still being promoted by him and by his supporters whatever the actual evidence really is.  There is no evidence against the McCanns EVERYTHING concerning them has been checked to the nth degree .

The police now have a prime suspect under investigation who they have apparently been investigating for years.  We shall just have to wait and see about him.

In the interim I think it has to be acknowledged that three national police forces have been following the evidence which is that Madeleine was abducted by a stranger whether Brueckner or another.  And I think that is hard for some to take in.

Hi Brietta, here is a short summary of the last Sexta9 episode:
 Sexta às 9 Episódio 29 - de 25 Set 2020 - RTP Play - RTP:
- according to the investigation of Sexta9, a group of German Russians is involved
- N Fehlinger was at the centre of this group; she was the one who maintained contacts between the members of the group
- as far as Wolters and his team knows, Brückner acted alone, but Sexta9 has found documents that show otherwise
- M Seyferth was interrogated in Frankfurt by German LE (after H Busching’s release from Greek prison) about two Russian brothers regarding a homocide.
- N Fehlinger was a dancer at the casino of Vilamoura. (Reference: Chiatos, Websleuths).

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1262 on: October 10, 2020, 02:11:35 PM »
Hi Brietta, here is a short summary of the last Sexta9 episode:
 Sexta às 9 Episódio 29 - de 25 Set 2020 - RTP Play - RTP:
- according to the investigation of Sexta9, a group of German Russians is involved
- N Fehlinger was at the centre of this group; she was the one who maintained contacts between the members of the group
- as far as Wolters and his team knows, Brückner acted alone, but Sexta9 has found documents that show otherwise
- M Seyferth was interrogated in Frankfurt by German LE (after H Busching’s release from Greek prison) about two Russian brothers regarding a homocide.
- N Fehlinger was a dancer at the casino of Vilamoura. (Reference: Chiatos, Websleuths).

At which point in the video did Wolters say he was going to be silent until next year?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1263 on: October 10, 2020, 02:12:58 PM »
A Spanish language show is not the sort of viewing one would normally associate with someone living in South Africa, I would suggest.
So obviously you have very esoteric viewing habits.
“What obscure viewing you must engage in. A Spanish language show is not the sort of viewing one would normally associate with someone living in South Africa, I would suggest. So obviously you have very esoteric viewing habits. As you are clearly fluent in Spanish, could you provide a translation for those of us who are not?“
Jassi, the above comments were directed at me by you in response to me providing a cite re. Wolters. Since you are not prepared to review your inaccuracies, innuendos, sarcasm and overall ignorance, the following:
- Sexta9 is a current affairs show on RTP, Portuguese television. Sandra Felgueiras is the anchor. Sexta 9 - English translation = Friday at 9.
- Therefore, nothing Spanish about it, let alone ‘obscure’ material or ‘esoteric viewing’ as you prefer to label me as a South African citizen.

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1264 on: October 10, 2020, 02:20:26 PM »
Might be vital viewing for you but sounds pretty obscure to me.  Not the sort of thing available in UK  on Freeview
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1265 on: October 10, 2020, 02:44:22 PM »
To be honest, does anyone care ?

Well it obviously does... to someone. waiting for a breakthrough that I very much doubt is going to come after all this time.

Seems the Germans have now hit a brick wall with CB.

A source close to the investigation said: “The probe into Christian B has hit a brick wall.

“If they are resorting to sending people into prison to try and get him to confess then it is a bit of a worrying sign.
 
“The Portuguese have long said that Christian B isn’t linked to Maddie's disappearance but the Germans remain convinced he is. And they seem determined to prove it.”

A report last week said an inmate was recruited when Christian B was in Wolfenbuettel jail before being transferred to Kiel, where he is now in solitary confinement.

Christian B was named as the prime suspect after phone records placed him in Praia da Luz in Portugal on the night Madeleine vanished.

Alexander Stevens, an expert on German criminal law, said investigators' chances of finding any new evidence was now low.

“The only remaining possibility to convict Christian B would be to obtain information about fellow prisoners.

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1266 on: October 10, 2020, 03:08:36 PM »
As there hasn't been a trace of Madeleine since 2007, it must be a well guarded secret, so I doubt anyone will be telling tales, not reliable ones anyway.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1267 on: October 10, 2020, 04:02:36 PM »
As there hasn't been a trace of Madeleine since 2007, it must be a well guarded secret, so I doubt anyone will be telling tales, not reliable ones anyway.

Don't forget Malta and Morocco and some train journey in Portugal and some girl with a coloboma speaking German and wasn't she seen in 2012? She's very well travelled according to some.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1268 on: October 10, 2020, 04:06:38 PM »
Don't forget Malta and Morocco and some train journey in Portugal and some girl with a coloboma speaking German and wasn't she seen in 2012? She's very well travelled according to some.


Ah yes, the 'sightings'.  Strange how none of them amounted to anything.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1269 on: October 10, 2020, 04:26:51 PM »
At which point in the video did Wolters say he was going to be silent until next year?

He's remaining silent because he's got nothing. Using inmates is desperation tactics i.e. he's got nothing!
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.


Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1271 on: October 10, 2020, 04:54:32 PM »
Might be vital viewing for you but sounds pretty obscure to me.  Not the sort of thing available in UK  on Freeview
Can you please stop insulting me.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1272 on: October 10, 2020, 04:58:54 PM »

I will be Deleting any further Insulting Comments and Issuing Warning Points.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1273 on: October 10, 2020, 08:31:57 PM »
Another source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8757067/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckners-lawyer-says-evidence-clears-client.html

He isn't reported as saying he was going to be silent, though, did he?

However it was revealed last week that the German prosecutor, Hans Christian Wolters, isn't expecting any new developments on the case until next year at the earliest.

He added that he was sure they have the right man during an interview with Portugese TV show Sexta as 9 on Friday,
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1274 on: October 10, 2020, 08:55:35 PM »
He isn't reported as saying he was going to be silent, though, did he?

However it was revealed last week that the German prosecutor, Hans Christian Wolters, isn't expecting any new developments on the case until next year at the earliest.

He added that he was sure they have the right man during an interview with Portugese TV show Sexta as 9 on Friday,
By implication Mr Wolters alluded to the fact that nothing will be forthcoming from his office until end of the year/next year.