Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Mr Gray]

He isn't reported as saying he was going to be silent, though, did he?

However it was revealed last week that the German prosecutor, Hans Christian Wolters, isn't expecting any new developments on the case until next year at the earliest.

He added that he was sure they have the right man during an interview with Portugese TV show Sexta as 9 on Friday,

So just using basic intelligence and logic..if he says there won't be any developments until the new year..what would you expect to be reported in the meantime

[G-Unit]

By implication Mr Wolters alluded to the fact that nothing will be forthcoming from his office until end of the year/next year.

I didn't ask for your interpretation of what he said, I asked what he actually said. It seems it wasn't what you claimed. That's why cites are important.

[Anthro]

I didn't ask for your interpretation of what he said, I asked what he actually said. It seems it wasn't what you claimed. That's why cites are important.

You prefer to be pedantic. I don’t.

[G-Unit]

You prefer to be pedantic. I don’t.

I would rather be pedantic than change what someone said.

[Brietta]

The final word on the Smith sighting;

This witness maintains his belief that judging by the posture, there seemed to be a probability of 60-80% that the person seen by him at about 21.55 at the previously mentioned place, was Madeleine’s father. At this time, Gerald’s presence at the restaurant was confirmed by his friends and has not been denied by restaurant employees.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LEGAL_SUMMARY.htm

So the 'many witnesses' were in reality his seven hoiday companions and no-one contradicted them. Did you know they were the only witnesses Brietta?

The only witnesses to the Smith sighting were members of the Smith family.  Did you know that Gunit? 

Neither is there a single independent witness who saw the Smiths in the location where they claimed to be.  Did you know that Gunit?

I think your prejudiced opinion as reflected in your post has blinded you to the fact that there was corroboration to the fact that there were indeed more witnesses who agreed with the friends you are libelling.
Read your cite properly.

💦At this time, Gerald’s presence at the restaurant was confirmed by his friends and has not been denied by restaurant employees.💦

Which in effect says that the restaurant employees when asked did not contradict the testimony of Gerry's friends.

Do you think the Policia Judiciaria are so stupid they wouldn't check out everyone who was in the public dining area to corroborate statements.

They obviously did do the checks which in my opinion is elementary procedure ~ remember this is Rebello's team we are talking about here not Amaral's ~ and the restaurant employees backed up what the McCann friends said.

The PJ took the evidence - they checked the evidence - they corroborated the evidence.  Which all confirmed that Gerry McCann was seated at the table in the tapas restaurant when the Smith family were wending their way home.

Now you know that Gunit.  Whether or not you decide to take it on board is entirely for you to determine.

[Brietta]

How can the police check all that out , if maddie had of been abducted at 8 30 she would not have been there for the 9 15 proud moment of gmcc when he checked.

I fail to see how not believing CB is the abductor is defending him.

Suppose it is your prerogative as to what you find amusing.

amusing though how you still class CB as prime suspect although just your presumption he still is.

How presumptuous also is D new signature,

 Signature:
It must upset posters that it now looks as though I was right all along

It is called evidence.  The police check evidence.  It's what they do to identify the bad guys. So I don't think they'll have a problem.

And who on earth said Madeleine was abducted at 8.30.  No-one but the abductor knows when she was taken but the one thing we can be sure of is that it was not the time you have intimated.  But I think you know that.

[Brietta]

Hi Brietta, here is a short summary of the last Sexta9 episode:
 Sexta às 9 Episódio 29 - de 25 Set 2020 - RTP Play - RTP:
- according to the investigation of Sexta9, a group of German Russians is involved
- N Fehlinger was at the centre of this group; she was the one who maintained contacts between the members of the group
- as far as Wolters and his team knows, Brückner acted alone, but Sexta9 has found documents that show otherwise
- M Seyferth was interrogated in Frankfurt by German LE (after H Busching’s release from Greek prison) about two Russian brothers regarding a homocide.
- N Fehlinger was a dancer at the casino of Vilamoura. (Reference: Chiatos, Websleuths).

Thanks Anthro.
One wonders exactly how many wheels within wheels might be involved in Madeleine's case.

[G-Unit]

The only witnesses to the Smith sighting were members of the Smith family.  Did you know that Gunit? 

Neither is there a single independent witness who saw the Smiths in the location where they claimed to be.  Did you know that Gunit?

I think your prejudiced opinion as reflected in your post has blinded you to the fact that there was corroboration to the fact that there were indeed more witnesses who agreed with the friends you are libelling.
Read your cite properly.

💦At this time, Gerald’s presence at the restaurant was confirmed by his friends and has not been denied by restaurant employees.💦

Which in effect says that the restaurant employees when asked did not contradict the testimony of Gerry's friends.

Do you think the Policia Judiciaria are so stupid they wouldn't check out everyone who was in the public dining area to corroborate statements.

They obviously did do the checks which in my opinion is elementary procedure ~ remember this is Rebello's team we are talking about here not Amaral's ~ and the restaurant employees backed up what the McCann friends said.

The PJ took the evidence - they checked the evidence - they corroborated the evidence.  Which all confirmed that Gerry McCann was seated at the table in the tapas restaurant when the Smith family were wending their way home.

Now you know that Gunit.  Whether or not you decide to take it on board is entirely for you to determine.

Have you read the Tapas restaurant employee's statements? Not one of them appeared to know which one of the group Gerry McCann was. Neither did they really back up what the McCann friends said.

I don't appreciate being accused of libelling people, by the way. Pointing out that the 'many witnesses' you referred to were in reality their 7 companions isn't libelous, it's the truth.

[Mr Gray]

Have you read the Tapas restaurant employee's statements? Not one of them appeared to know which one of the group Gerry McCann was. Neither did they really back up what the McCann friends said.

I don't appreciate being accused of libelling people, by the way. Pointing out that the 'many witnesses' you referred to were in reality their 7 companions isn't libelous, it's the truth.

Just as everything I have seen in the media re CB is the truth yet sceptics seem to think he has grounds to sue

[Vertigo Swirl]

Have you read the Tapas restaurant employee's statements? Not one of them appeared to know which one of the group Gerry McCann was. Neither did they really back up what the McCann friends said.

I don't appreciate being accused of libelling people, by the way. Pointing out that the 'many witnesses' you referred to were in reality their 7 companions isn't libelous, it's the truth.

It is if you actually think about what you’re implying.

[Brietta]

Have you read the Tapas restaurant employee's statements? Not one of them appeared to know which one of the group Gerry McCann was. Neither did they really back up what the McCann friends said.

I don't appreciate being accused of libelling people, by the way. Pointing out that the 'many witnesses' you referred to were in reality their 7 companions isn't libelous, it's the truth.

Innuendo or insinuation is considered libel ... ask Sally Bercow {"innocent face" } and read the judgement,


BBC reaches settlement with Lord McAlpine https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20348978  ""We will now be continuing to seek settlements from other organisations that have published defamatory remarks and individuals who have used Twitter to defame me."

[Mr Gray]

The final word on the Smith sighting;

This witness maintains his belief that judging by the posture, there seemed to be a probability of 60-80% that the person seen by him at about 21.55 at the previously mentioned place, was Madeleine’s father. At this time, Gerald’s presence at the restaurant was confirmed by his friends and has not been denied by restaurant employees.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LEGAL_SUMMARY.htm

So the 'many witnesses' were in reality his seven hoiday companions and no-one contradicted them. Did you know they were the only witnesses Brietta?

I think it's ridiculous to claim you can identify anyone to any degree of certainty based on their posture.

[Brietta]

Have you read the Tapas restaurant employee's statements? Not one of them appeared to know which one of the group Gerry McCann was. Neither did they really back up what the McCann friends said.

I don't appreciate being accused of libelling people, by the way. Pointing out that the 'many witnesses' you referred to were in reality their 7 companions isn't libelous, it's the truth.

💦At this time, Gerald’s presence at the restaurant was confirmed by his friends and has not been denied by restaurant employees.💦

I remain astounded by your inability regarding English interpretation.  I have absolutely no idea why you fail to understand what the Policia Judiciaria are saying here, in the cite you posted.

[G-Unit]

Innuendo or insinuation is considered libel ... ask Sally Bercow {"innocent face" } and read the judgement,


BBC reaches settlement with Lord McAlpine https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20348978  ""We will now be continuing to seek settlements from other organisations that have published defamatory remarks and individuals who have used Twitter to defame me."

I have no idea what you imagine I'm insinuating. Please explain.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I have no idea what you imagine I'm insinuating. Please explain.

“So the 'many witnesses' were in reality his seven hoiday companions and no-one contradicted them. Did you know they were the only witnesses Brietta?

And your problem with that is...?