Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Brietta]

Since when did it become acceptable to state abduction as fact?

I don't recall seeing that rule change.

I think it's great news though, because in the interests of fairness & balance it means I'm free to state that Maddie died in the holiday apartment.

No rule change was required.  It is a fact that the Brits the Germans and the Portuguese investigators are investigating Madeleine's abduction.  If you think they've got it wrong perhaps you should complain to them.

[jassi]

Us supporters can't help knowing how your minds work.

That's good. You can take the penalty points instead of us 

[Wonderfulspam]

No rule change was required.  It is a fact that the Brits the Germans and the Portuguese investigators are investigating Madeleine's abduction.  If you think they've got it wrong perhaps you should complain to them.

They could investigate her abduction indefinitely, that doesn't mean she was abducted.

Indeed, they've squandered £12 million investigating abduction & where has it got them?

They still haven't proven the McCanns didn't do it.

[G-Unit]

I have already explained.  I'm afraid I cannot rectify your lack of comprehension regarding what I have posted.

In my opinion your postings have not explained anything, but there we are. I'll just have to accept that your mysterious insinuations concerning my supposed insinuations will remain unexplained to me.

[Brietta]

In my opinion your postings have not explained anything, but there we are. I'll just have to accept that your mysterious insinuations concerning my supposed insinuations will remain unexplained to me.

              I think you got the message ;)

[Vertigo Swirl]

In my opinion your postings have not explained anything, but there we are. I'll just have to accept that your mysterious insinuations concerning my supposed insinuations will remain unexplained to me.

Brietta's posts are crystal clear to me.  The fact that you have ignored my request to explain why it is significant in your view that the witnesses to Gerry's whereabouts at the time the alarm was raised were all members of the McCanns holiday group also speaks volumes. 

[Admin]

It's quite ignorable IMO because there is evidence that Madeleine was abducted.  Of course some people prefer to ignore the evidence as is their prerogative but IMO either they shouldn't seek to impose their opinion as a fact on the rest of us or they should simply accept that we all have differing view points, and not get their knickers in a twist if one of us claims Madeleine was abducted.

If I read the evidence correctly then abducted should be followed immediately by the words "from the street outside".

As far as the police investigations are concerned, none of us are privy to what is or is not being investigated. The correct phraseology would be, "The police are investigating Madeleine's disappearance".

[Admin]

“We don’t have the body and no parts of the body, but we have enough evidence to say our suspect killed Madeleine McCann,” German prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters revealed to Australian TV show 60 Minutes.

What the evidence is remains unclear, however, Wolters also told the program detectives dug up 8,000 items, including files on hard drives and USB sticks, buried next to Bruckner’s dead dog at the property in Neuwegersleben, Germany.

Asked if any of the uncovered images were of the toddler, Wolters said, “At the moment, I am not allowed to comment on that, so I am not able to say if there are pictures or there are no pictures of Madeleine.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXsXXxRek2Q......at 9.30.

Clearly Wolters has NO pictures of Madeleine or any other tangible evidence connected Christian Brueckner to her disappearance.  As time passes, his credibility begins to evaporate.

[Mr Gray]

If I read the evidence correctly then abducted should be followed immediately by the words "from the street outside".

As far as the police investigations are concerned, none of us are privy to what is or is not being investigated. The correct phraseology would be, "The police are investigating Madeleine's disappearance".

I think those who think that pay far to much reliance on the  tracking dog evidence

[Mr Gray]

Clearly Wolters has NO pictures of Madeleine or any other tangible evidence connected Christian Brueckner to her disappearance.  As time passes, his credibility begins to evaporate.

I think you are posting opinion as fact...wolters may well have images...we dont know. I don't see his credibility evaporating at all.

[Mr Gray]

If I read the evidence correctly then abducted should be followed immediately by the words "from the street outside".

As far as the police investigations are concerned, none of us are privy to what is or is not being investigated. The correct phraseology would be, "The police are investigating Madeleine's disappearance".

Surely  as CB is now the prime suspect police are investigating MM's abduction

[Robittybob1]

Surely  as CB is now the prime suspect police are investigating MM's abduction

Why would they?  If they think he killed her.  That step is sufficient on its own (as a guess).

[Mr Gray]

Why would they?  If they think he killed her.  That step is sufficient on its own.

I think its quite obvious. Going by CB's history its unlikely he killed Maddie in the   apt   more likely sbducted for abuse

[Mr Gray]

Both rob and admin posting opinion as fact

[Eleanor]

Why would they?  If they think he killed her.  That step is sufficient on its own.

As far as I understand there are two possible charges here.  Abduction and Murder.  Brueckner could be guilty of both.