Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Vertigo Swirl]

Everything you don't know if they are still investigating him or if they have hit that break wall which would no surprise IMO.

Then that would only leave he mccs.

[Robittybob1]

And who on earth said Madeleine was abducted at 8.30

Where did I say that someone said maddie was abducted at 8,30 I wish you would get things right when replying.

It was a point I made that you would think if there was an abductor around at 8 pm on a mobile why did he hang around for another hour and a half.

Why did he not just go in at 8.30 when the mccs left were he would have known he had plenty of time before checking started.

Why would he hang around then decide to go in right in the middle of all the checking?

It is easier to do crime in the cover of darkness.   In other words you've got to wait until its dark.

[Anthro]

If you want a better understanding of what's happening have a look in the German papers

I also find the German press informative re. Brückner.

[Mr Gray]

Everything you don't know if they are still investigating him or if they have hit that break wall which would no surprise IMO.

Then that would only leave he mccs.

I think that has to be not just one of your most ridiculous posts but about the most ridiculous post ever on this forum

[sadie]

Of course, I would never think CB killed Madeleine in the apartment.  In my theory, opinion or whatever you want to call it, Madeleine escaped the apartment and tried to get into the Tapas Restaurant.  If the door at the entrance to the Tapas area was closed how would Madeleine open it?
In a recent documentary I see the door handle to this door has been changed to a lever type, compared to the large round knob door handle that was there in 2007. 

 But surely a charge of murder would be sufficient (IMO).

That is a good point, Rob.
But when we ate there, the door was wide open.

[sadie]

And who on earth said Madeleine was abducted at 8.30

Where did I say that someone said maddie was abducted at 8,30 I wish you would get things right when replying.

It was a point I made that you would think if there was an abductor around at 8 pm on a mobile why did he hang around for another hour and a half.

Why did he not just go in at 8.30 when the mccs left were he would have known he had plenty of time before checking started.

Why would he hang around then decide to go in right in the middle of all the checking?

Simples Kizzy

1)  We all know about the watchers as seen by several witnesses.  The abduction group were aware that 4 groups of friends had to travel from their apartments to the Tapas restaurant.  None of the abduction group would want to be seen by any of the friends, so they would keep clear until every one had left and reached the restaurant.  IIRC The Paynes were very late and then Matt, who had set out to try and chivvy up The Paynes, saw them en route.   
Seems he decided that he was almost there, so he went to check his daughters' and Madeleines windows for noise (Like they used to do at Butlins).  By the time Matt got back to the restaurant it was almost time to do the 9pm checks

2)  Darkness was coming, but at 8.30 pm it would have been far too light to risk showing themselves.

All IMO, but it all fits.

Simples, Kizzy, when you think about it.

[Robittybob1]

That is a good point, Rob.
But when we ate there, the door was wide open.

Exactly and that is how I think Kate imagined it would be on the night too, but once the Executive Chef Arlindo ... turned up I imagine he shut that door to keep the locals out.  He talks of a "COMMOTION" out on the road and cars parked up there.  Maybe he had some concerns and shut the door, not knowing that the McCann kids could be coming through there unattended by the adults.   When Russell returned just prior to Kate doing her check he might have reopened it.

[kizzy]

I think that has to be not just one of your most ridiculous posts but about the most ridiculous post ever on this forum

Well seeing your post gave you the right to judgement to ridicule my post twice.

To me your post shows a weakness and lack of confidence that you felt a need toridicule me as a poster.

The mccs have not been ruled out. the abduction of Maddie from her bed has not been proven or any proof.

My advice to your posting is if you believe the mccs are not involved and CB is have a bit moe confidence in that.

I have confidence in what I post. if you don't like them put me on block not act as if Im some sort of threat with your insults.

[barrier]

Well seeing your post gave you the right to judgement to ridicule my post twice.

To me your post shows a weakness and lack of confidence that you felt a need toridicule me as a poster.

The mccs have not been ruled out. the abduction of Maddie from her bed has not been proven or any proof.

My advice to your posting is if you believe the mccs are not involved and CB is have a bit moe confidence in that.

I have confidence in what I post. if you don't like them put me on block not act as if Im some sort of threat with your insults.

Modus operandi.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well seeing your post gave you the right to judgement to ridicule my post twice.

To me your post shows a weakness and lack of confidence that you felt a need toridicule me as a poster.

The mccs have not been ruled out. the abduction of Maddie from her bed has not been proven or any proof.

My advice to your posting is if you believe the mccs are not involved and CB is have a bit moe confidence in that.

I have confidence in what I post. if you don't like them put me on block not act as if Im some sort of threat with your insults.

Are you seriously asking Davel to have more confidence in the McCanns’ innocence?  Is that even possible?!

[Mr Gray]

Well seeing your post gave you the right to judgement to ridicule my post twice.

To me your post shows a weakness and lack of confidence that you felt a need toridicule me as a poster.

The mccs have not been ruled out. the abduction of Maddie from her bed has not been proven or any proof.

My advice to your posting is if you believe the mccs are not involved and CB is have a bit moe confidence in that.

I have confidence in what I post. if you don't like them put me on block not act as if Im some sort of threat with your insults.

Another ridiculous post. why on earth should I feel threatened by your posts...its laughable.
You posted that if CB is not charged that leaves the Mccanns....it doesnt only leave the mcCanns if CB isnt prosecuted. he may well be guilty and not prosecuted.

the SC didnt say the McCanns are  not ruled out by the way...they obviously are imo.


I have every confidence in the mccanns innocence because I understand the evidence.....and i think its highly likeley CB is involved...again based on the evidence

[The General]

Another ridiculous post. why on earth should I feel threatened by your posts...its laughable.
You posted that if CB is not charged that leaves the Mccanns....it doesnt only leave the mcCanns if CB isnt prosecuted. he may well be guilty and not prosecuted.

the SC didnt say the McCanns are  not ruled out by the way...they obviously are imo.


I have every confidence in the mccanns innocence because I understand the evidence.....and i think its highly likeley CB is involved...again based on the evidence

I thought we were all trying to get along now?

[Mr Gray]

I thought we were all trying to get along now?

I am...but I don't see why Kizzy thinks I should feel threatened by her posts...or why she thinks I don't have confidence in the McCanns innocence...

[kizzy]

I am...but I don't see why Kizzy thinks I should feel threatened by her posts...or why she thinks I don't have confidence in the McCanns innocence...

The point was you have your opinion I have mine.

There is no need to ridicule my posts.

I have as much right to believe the mccs are involved ...as you have thinking they are not.

Just take my posts with a pinch of salt ..like I do yours.

If as you believe the mccs are innocent ....why should it bother you what I post.

[Mr Gray]

The point was you have your opinion I have mine.

There is no need to ridicule my posts.

I have as much right to believe the mccs are involved ...as you have thinking they are not.

Just take my posts with a pinch of salt ..like I do yours.

If as you believe the mccs are innocent ....why should it bother you what I post.

It's a discussion forum...if I want to give my opinion on your posts that's up to me. If someone said the earth was flat I would consider that ridiculous..that's how I see your posts