Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357814 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1950 on: October 25, 2020, 08:17:17 AM »
It is looking more and more like CB was, in fact, a scapegoat there seems to be no evidence he is the so-called abductor of Maddie.


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13013261/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-b-investigation-close/


We can also reveal how cops on Praia Da Luz where Maddie vanished 13 years ago are privately seething the investigation into Bruckener has carried on so long.

They insist he was ruled out as a suspect soon after the four-year-old  went missing.

And the Portugese believe vital time has been wasted by focusing on the jailed German sex offender.

“The game is almost up for the officers investigating Christian B,” a source close to the investigation said yesterday.

“They’ve been struggling now for many weeks to find new clues[/u]. Leads have dried up catastrophically and there are now hardly any new lines of enquiry at all.

None of this has come as a surprise to the Portuguese team who worked on the original investigation. They have believed for a long time that the investigation into B is effectively a wild goose chase.


This is from a Portuguese source who know nothing about the German evidence. It will not be easy to build s case against CB after all this time but Wolters has strong evidence Maddie was murdered.
This in itself is progress and may well prove stranger abduction

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1951 on: October 25, 2020, 08:35:15 AM »
It is looking more and more like CB was, in fact, a scapegoat there seems to be no evidence he is the so-called abductor of Maddie.


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13013261/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-b-investigation-close/


We can also reveal how cops on Praia Da Luz where Maddie vanished 13 years ago are privately seething the investigation into Bruckener has carried on so long.

They insist he was ruled out as a suspect soon after the four-year-old  went missing.

And the Portugese believe vital time has been wasted by focusing on the jailed German sex offender.

“The game is almost up for the officers investigating Christian B,” a source close to the investigation said yesterday.

“They’ve been struggling now for many weeks to find new clues[/u]. Leads have dried up catastrophically and there are now hardly any new lines of enquiry at all.

None of this has come as a surprise to the Portuguese team who worked on the original investigation. They have believed for a long time that the investigation into B is effectively a wild goose chase.

They would say that wouldn’t they.  In fact it wouldn’t surprise me if “a source close to the investigation “ wasn’t a certain “doctor” of the dark arts of policing himself.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1952 on: October 25, 2020, 08:45:38 AM »
It seems the Sun and the Star with their Portuguese sources have now become the sceptic go to source for reliable information on the case

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1953 on: October 25, 2020, 09:19:24 AM »
It seems the Sun and the Star with their Portuguese sources have now become the sceptic go to source for reliable information on the case
Let’s not forget the sceptic mantra: if it’s an unnamed source it must be made up.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1954 on: October 25, 2020, 09:51:55 AM »
If it's an unnamed source then it's suspect - until confirmed.
 Unfortunately most information comes from unconfirmed sources
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1955 on: October 25, 2020, 10:11:05 AM »
If it's an unnamed source then it's suspect - until confirmed.
 Unfortunately most information comes from unconfirmed sources
Indeed, and all the information and opinion on this forum is supplied by unnamed sources (except for John - we know who he is).
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1956 on: October 25, 2020, 10:20:18 AM »
This is from a Portuguese source who know nothing about the German evidence. It will not be easy to build s case against CB after all this time but Wolters has strong evidence Maddie was murdered.
This in itself is progress and may well prove stranger abduction

Thought they were all working together just shows they are not.

SY seems to be still treating it as a missing case or why else would they need another year's funding.

More or less what we have been saying

It’s an about-turn from the prosecutor who has previously claimed police have “concrete” evidence Madeleine is dead.

Now he’s told podcast They’ve Taken Her: “Maybe we need more witnesses or photos or video.”

He added: "Maybe we need one witness who can tell us the things we don’t know.”

A friend of the McCann family said: “It feels like he is trying to lower expectations after coming out all guns blazing.

"It’s heartbreaking for Kate and Gerry.”

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1957 on: October 25, 2020, 10:24:46 AM »
Thought they were all working together just shows they are not.

SY seems to be still treating it as a missing case or why else would they need another year's funding.

More or less what we have been saying

It’s an about-turn from the prosecutor who has previously claimed police have “concrete” evidence Madeleine is dead.

Now he’s told podcast They’ve Taken Her: “Maybe we need more witnesses or photos or video.”

He added: "Maybe we need one witness who can tell us the things we don’t know.”

A friend of the McCann family said: “It feels like he is trying to lower expectations after coming out all guns blazing.

"It’s heartbreaking for Kate and Gerry.”


You dont seem to understand what he said...no about turn.

They have concrete evidence of death...they just need more evidence to prove the link to CB

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1958 on: October 25, 2020, 10:30:02 AM »
You dont seem to understand what he said...no about turn.

They have concrete evidence of death...they just need more evidence to prove the link to CB

It isn't me who said it.


https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-suspect-never-quizzed-22900129

It was obvious when he was speaking to MS his confidence was not the same.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1959 on: October 25, 2020, 10:34:50 AM »
You dont seem to understand what he said...no about turn.

They have concrete evidence of death...they just need more evidence to prove the link to CB

Wolters said they have concrete evidence that Madeleine is dead and that CB killed her. The same evidence shows both.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1960 on: October 25, 2020, 10:37:22 AM »
Wolters said they have concrete evidence that Madeleine is dead and that CB killed her. The same evidence shows both.

could be video or photos......death could be confirmed but not precisely who caused daeth

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1961 on: October 25, 2020, 10:38:33 AM »
It isn't me who said it.


https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-suspect-never-quizzed-22900129

It was obvious when he was speaking to MS his confidence was not the same.

obvious to you

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1962 on: October 25, 2020, 10:39:57 AM »
could be video or photos......death could be confirmed but not precisely who caused daeth
Wolters originally said his suspect did for Madeleine.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1963 on: October 25, 2020, 10:46:56 AM »
Wolters originally said his suspect did for Madeleine.

he has evidence but not proof

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1964 on: October 25, 2020, 10:47:16 AM »
obvious to you

I think you will find its obvious to a lot more people than me.

Imo judging by your posts its some sort of game, not you want the truth. ..more you just want to be proved right.

Think you would be wise to change your signature.