Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Eleanor]

Certainly enough to arrest him.

But not to convict him of murder.

[faithlilly]

But not to convict him of murder.

Or even suggest Madeleine was murdered...so why is he claiming they have ?

[Angelo222]

Yes, try it for yourself.
Any photo taken on your camera & downloaded to your computer with show details of the camera etc as described previously. A picture downloaded from the internet will not have this data, though it may show other data

Perfectly correct. In fact, you can go into photo properties on your computer and make most photo data unreadable if you really want or even render it readable only by using a password.

[Angelo222]

Logistically the parents absolutely could have done it. In my opinion over-reliance on their timeline is the problem.

Given that the last time she was seen in public was around 6pm and her disappearance wasn't announced until after 10pm then a lot can happen in four hours.  We know that Kate McCann's version of David Payne's visit to the apartment doesn't tally with his and in fact were so different that Amaral rightly thought it extremely suspicious.

[faithlilly]

Given that the last time she was seen in public was around 6pm and her disappearance wasn't announced until after 10pm then a lot can happen in four hours.  We know that Kate McCann's version of David Payne's visit to the apartment doesn't tally with his and in fact were so different that Amaral rightly thought it extremely suspicious.

And the visit didn’t appear to rather late on the proceedings. The questionnaires filled in by DP doesn’t appear to have the visit.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Given that the last time she was seen in public was around 6pm and her disappearance wasn't announced until after 10pm then a lot can happen in four hours.  We know that Kate McCann's version of David Payne's visit to the apartment doesn't tally with his and in fact were so different that Amaral rightly thought it extremely suspicious.

How does this fit with your belief that Madeleine woke and wandered?

[pathfinder73]

And the visit didn’t appear to rather late on the proceedings. The questionnaires filled in by DP doesn’t appear to have the visit.

5pm in the questionnaire. Amazing how they can remember things entirely different only hours before a crime happened. You should be thinking straight after the disappearance what can I remember about that day that may help find her. Instead we got contradictions and err's.

[Eleanor]

And the visit didn’t appear to rather late on the proceedings. The questionnaires filled in by DP doesn’t appear to have the visit.

I wonder why Rebelo left England before David Payne's Rogatory Interview even began?

Oh, Whoops.  More leaks from The PJ.

[jassi]

I wonder why Rebelo left England before David Payne's Rogatory Interview even began?

Oh, Whoops.  More leaks from The PJ.

I reckon it was because he realised it was a complete waste of time.

[Brietta]

Given that the last time she was seen in public was around 6pm and her disappearance wasn't announced until after 10pm then a lot can happen in four hours.  We know that Kate McCann's version of David Payne's visit to the apartment doesn't tally with his and in fact were so different that Amaral rightly thought it extremely suspicious.

Don't you think that master criminals as sceptics think they are would have put their heads together and made sure they were all word perfect.

In my opinion that would have been cause for suspicion.

[Mr Gray]

I reckon it was because he realised it was a complete waste of time.

Yes I bet he did as noone even came close to falling down the stairs

[faithlilly]

Don't you think that master criminals as sceptics think they are would have put their heads together and made sure they were all word perfect.

In my opinion that would have been cause for suspicion.

This was a developing story..collaboration wasn’t always possible.

[Robittybob1]

Yes I bet he did as no one even came close to falling down the stairs

What no ellipses!  I still don't understand your humour, sorry.

[Brietta]

This was a developing story..collaboration wasn’t always possible.

Was it you who posted only yesterday I believe, precisely that slur in relation to the timeline ... or was it A N Other sceptic?

In my opinion nefarious collaboration is a sceptic shibboleth ~ which in my opinion is just a nonsense for the simple reason they would have made a much better job of it if they had.

For example why not set the ball rolling at 7.00am ??? in my opinion that could have been made to address quite a few of the "inconsistencies" which have caused sceptics such angst over the years.

I think their priority was to get Madeleine back and only the truth was going to do that but the evidence is that an incompetent in charge of the investigation didn't take the time to work that one out.

[faithlilly]

Was it you who posted only yesterday I believe, precisely that slur in relation to the timeline ... or was it A N Other sceptic?

In my opinion nefarious collaboration is a sceptic shibboleth ~ which in my opinion is just a nonsense for the simple reason they would have made a much better job of it if they had.

For example why not set the ball rolling at 7.00am ??? in my opinion that could have been made to address quite a few of the "inconsistencies" which have caused sceptics such angst over the years.

I think their priority was to get Madeleine back and only the truth was going to do that but the evidence is that an incompetent in charge of the investigation didn't take the time to work that one out.

Collaboration is a slur ? We have empirical evidence of it with the timeline handed into the PJ on the 10th of May.
If they had collaborated they would have made a better job of it ? They did collaborate on the 10th of May timeline and Gerry still managed to be on a different side of the road to that claimed later.

As I said a fast moving story.