Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[jassi]

I think you are referring to the ones used at his trial...not the ones found under his dead dog. the ones that Wolyers refused to discuss as to what was on them

Have you a cite to show that they are different stash of memory sticks/cards ?

[Mr Gray]

Have you a cite to show that they are different  ?

My post does say I think...so no post required.....but i will look later.
The memory sticks found under his dog were found not to long ago when he was alraedy in prison as I recall but would need to check.

[The General]

Have you a cite to show that they are different  ?

As I mentioned earlier, it barely matters, as clearly neither are enough to inculcate CB.
It would be very interesting if a jury were involved though, as the bar may be a wee bit more flexible when considering beyond reasonable doubt, and then we would see if HCW had the town halls to place his appendage on the proverbial.
There's every chance that he's presented his 'evidence' at least once, maybe more, but has been told he hasn't reached the threshold to even charge. That would mean that this evidence is super thin and all circumstantial.
AIMHOAA

[The General]

My post does say I think...so no post required.....but i will look later.
The memory sticks found under his dog were found not to long ago when he was alraedy in prison as I recall but would need to check.

You have to state IMHO, or AYOMBA, or somesuch.

[jassi]

Memory sticks found under dog 2016
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8394855/Christian-Brueckner-linked-FOURTH-unsolved-case.html

"More than 100 officers descended on the old box factory in February 2016, digging holes looking for Inga's body.

The little girl wasn't found but Brueckner's USB stash of child sex abuse images was found on a USB stick hidden under 'animal bones' with police now set to return, according to German tabloid Bild."

[The General]

Memory sticks found under dog 2016
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8394855/Christian-Brueckner-linked-FOURTH-unsolved-case.html

"More than 100 officers descended on the old box factory in February 2016, digging holes looking for Inga's body.

The little girl wasn't found but Brueckner's USB stash of child sex abuse images was found on a USB stick hidden under 'animal bones' with police now set to return, according to German tabloid Bild."

Slightly longer than 'not too long ago' then. The Master becomes the pupil. Again.

[Brietta]

As long as we have freedom of speech I’ll call the mockumentary what I please.

And while yes it does matter where Gerry said he stood, for all the details I have laid out above, 12 years ago the parent’s own detectives said in their report that they didn’t believe that the Tanner sighting was important, a sentiment mirrored by OG five years later when they identified Tannerman and ruled him out of their investigation. Inexplicably you still find the sighting important. Why ?

Further I’m afraid I cannot take seriously someone who reprimands members for not focusing on finding Madeleine while also trying to convince them that the child has been the victim of a vicious paedophile.

Sigh ... feel free to hang a label on yourself if you so desire if that is how you wish to define yourself absolutely no skin off my nose.

If as you say "that the child has been the victim of a vicious paedophile" don't you think the German police are pulling out all the stops to find evidence which might bring the "vicious paedophile" to justice?

In my opinion ~ if the forum was running a '.........t and most inaccurate (your ad hom directed at me) post of the week' yours above would be well in the running ~ as well as not even giving a nod to the topic of the thread.

[Mr Gray]

Slightly longer than 'not too long ago' then. The Master becomes the pupil. Again.

behave grasshopper...A wise master is always a pupil and never stops learning

The fact that the sticks themeselves were found in 2016 does not mean any images were identified then.

[The General]

behave grasshopper...

The fact that the sticks themeselves were found in 2016 does not mean any images were identified then.

Granted. But then that would point to 100's of 1000's of images than needed to be analysed by some poor souls in a bunker somewhere. IMEO

[Mr Gray]

Granted. But then that would point to 100's of 1000's of images than needed to be analysed by some poor souls in a bunker somewhere. IMEO

Well done....IMHO

[The General]

Well done....IMHO

I tumbled to this and did state as such several weeks ago in fairness.
It's the only situation that fits the facts. IMEEAO

[faithlilly]

Sigh ... feel free to hang a label on yourself if you so desire if that is how you wish to define yourself absolutely no skin off my nose.

If as you say "that the child has been the victim of a vicious paedophile" don't you think the German police are pulling out all the stops to find evidence which might bring the "vicious paedophile" to justice?

In my opinion ~ if the forum was running a '.........t and most inaccurate (your ad hom directed at me) post of the week' yours above would be well in the running ~ as well as not even giving a nod to the topic of the thread.

You say....’ shame on you, you should be focused on finding Madeleine ‘.... yet think the German police are pulling out all the stops to convict the paedophile who...did what ? Took her to a lovely, childless couple ? How do you square that circle ?

[kizzy]

I didnt say video of CB in 5a ...that would be proof. ...so your logic goeas out the window. CB likes to film his exploits. in his chatroom chat he said he would document his crime.


i'm explaining to those who doubt him how Wolters may have very strong evidence...if not proof...of abduction and death...but not enough to link to CB.

As I said months ago they would seek to trace his movements the day and the days after the crime. According to the latest article in the Sun..I know  we cant trust it....this is exactly what the latest trip to prtugal may be for. Looks like Im right on the money

I don't know about that looks like they need stronger evidence before they can go.

 So doesn't say much for the strong evidence Wolters already has it seems.



Despite the high profile nature of the probe into Christian B the case has hit a brick wall in recent weeks.

And German police have only been in the Algarve a couple of times since the probe into Christian B was announced back over the Summer.

It is likely the detectives will need to present strong evidence of leads to follow up in order to be given permission to fly in and investigate the case.

[Mr Gray]

I don't know about that looks like they need stronger evidence before they can go.

 So doesn't say much for the strong evidence Wolters already has it seems.



Despite the high profile nature of the probe into Christian B the case has hit a brick wall in recent weeks.

And German police have only been in the Algarve a couple of times since the probe into Christian B was announced back over the Summer.

It is likely the detectives will need to present strong evidence of leads to follow up in order to be given permission to fly in and investigate the case.

I wouldnt believe everything you read in the papers

[kizzy]

I wouldnt believe everything you read in the papers

Ah lol ...just the bits that suit you eh D.


As I said months ago they would seek to trace his movements the day and the days after the crime. According to the latest article in the Sun..I know  we cant trust it....this is exactly what the latest trip to prtugal may be for. Looks like Im right on the money

But it looks like they haven't got what it takes to go ...proof CB was the so-called abducter or are going to get it .