Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 359281 times)

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2280 on: October 30, 2020, 09:02:02 PM »
Naturally. Whatever has triggered their suspicions they need more. If they don't get it it doesn't mean they have disproved whatever they have, it means it's not enough to charge their suspect.
Well the PJ and the Germans can’t both be right, and as we now know the PJ have been working on the abduction thesis since reviewing the files so....
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2281 on: October 30, 2020, 09:05:22 PM »

I think the PJ were just useless

No more  useless than the parents - the ones responsible for their daughters fate what ever that was/is.

Having a meal with your children isn't a bad thing you know.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2282 on: October 30, 2020, 09:10:41 PM »
Well the PJ and the Germans can’t both be right, and as we now know the PJ have been working on the abduction thesis since reviewing the files so....

Indeed.  AND  he outcome of all the abduction theories  investigations is............

Big fat zero!
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2283 on: October 30, 2020, 09:11:48 PM »
No more  useless than the parents - the ones responsible for their daughters fate what ever that was/is.

Having a meal with your children isn't a bad thing you know.

you know what i  dont understand    didnt the mcanns   have a nanny  at home??  why didnt they  take her to  watch the  children while  they went out for  dinner with their friends??

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2284 on: October 30, 2020, 09:16:11 PM »
Indeed.  AND  he outcome of all the abduction theories  investigations is............

Big fat zero!
whereas the investigation into parental involvement was...?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2285 on: October 30, 2020, 09:20:00 PM »
Indeed.  AND  he outcome of all the abduction theories  investigations is............

Big fat zero!
Not sure if you have followed what's happening.. Wolters may well have proof of abduction and death

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2286 on: October 30, 2020, 09:20:32 PM »
It wasn't me who brought up the subjects of evidence and proof, both of which lack an agreed definition. Obviously you've no intention of explaining your post so clearly it was an opinion being posted as fact.

In my opinion it's quite acceptable for police to see many indications leading towards a possible answer in a case. In the end the PJ were unable to find definitive evidence to charge their suspects. They were indeed unable to confirm the indications were correct, but that's not the same as proving them groundless or non existent imo.

Your opinion really doesn't matter. 

It is the evidence that matters. 

The Policia Judiciaria didn't come up with any and that is on record in their Final Report. 

Ignoring that fact won't make it go away and I cannot fathom why you find yourself still unable to accept the facts as they very obviously stand ~ that there is NO evidence against the McCanns ~ and the investigation is into Madeleine's abduction by a stranger.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2287 on: October 30, 2020, 09:27:45 PM »
whereas the investigation into parental involvement was...?

whereas the investigation into parental involvement was...? never investigated properly due to media blocking and shifting timelines and refusal to take part in a reconstruction.

Just because they were never charged due to lack of physical evidence/and eye witness- does no mean they have no case to answer
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2288 on: October 30, 2020, 09:31:02 PM »
Not sure if you have followed what's happening.. Wolters may well have proof of abduction and death

Yes, trying to catch up now and then- very busy due to Covid.

Wolters=disappointing. may well have proof? I may well have a lottery win next month. I am not convinced of his narrative.

However I do believe MBM was killed on that night.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2289 on: October 30, 2020, 09:31:20 PM »
whereas the investigation into parental involvement was...? never investigated properly due to media blocking and shifting timelines and refusal to take part in a reconstruction.

Just because they were never charged due to lack of physical evidence/and eye witness- does no mean they have no case to answer

They have no case to answer because no case has ever been made against them

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2290 on: October 30, 2020, 09:31:48 PM »
Yes, trying to catch up now and then- very busy due to Covid.

Wolters=disappointing. may well have proof? I may well have a lottery win next month. I am not convinced of his narrative.

However I do believe MBM was killed on that night.

Doesn't matter what you think as you've said you haven't kept up...I doubt...based on the evidence that Maddie was killed that night...and it's highly likely imo ...again based on lots of things...that Wolters does have proof of death and abduction...it's unlikely you will win the lottery
« Last Edit: October 30, 2020, 09:34:46 PM by Davel »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2291 on: October 30, 2020, 09:32:49 PM »
whereas the investigation into parental involvement was...? never investigated properly due to media blocking and shifting timelines and refusal to take part in a reconstruction.

Just because they were never charged due to lack of physical evidence/and eye witness- does no mean they have no case to answer
that sounds like a truly pathetic excuse to me - just how weak do you think the PJ are / were and why do you suppose they have now conceded abduction is a theory worth investigating?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2292 on: October 30, 2020, 09:53:24 PM »
that sounds like a truly pathetic excuse to me - just how weak do you think the PJ are / were and why do you suppose they have now conceded abduction is a theory worth investigating?

I am of the opinion that they were encouraged to revisit the abduction theory we don't know if they believe MBM was abducted which is more to the point.

and it is worth mentioning- they have not got any evidence of abduction from the bedroom to show, and didn't have enough evidence to charge kate/Gerry. Just as they have not enough evidence to charge CB.  it is all still balls in the air at the moment.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2293 on: October 30, 2020, 10:05:57 PM »
I am of the opinion that they were encouraged to revisit the abduction theory we don't know if they believe MBM was abducted which is more to the point.

and it is worth mentioning- they have not got any evidence of abduction from the bedroom to show, and didn't have enough evidence to charge kate/Gerry. Just as they have not enough evidence to charge CB.  it is all still balls in the air at the moment.

You haven't got a clue what evidence Wolters has and as you've said you are not up to speed with developments.
From what Wolters has said it's highly likely he strong evidence if not proof of abduction and death

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2294 on: October 30, 2020, 10:09:06 PM »
Well the PJ and the Germans can’t both be right, and as we now know the PJ have been working on the abduction thesis since reviewing the files so....

The Porto team, you mean? That was in 2013 and in 2017 do Carmo said he didn't know what happened to Madeleine, so I wouldn't get too excited if I were you.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0