Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 358072 times)

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2355 on: November 01, 2020, 12:22:26 PM »
Why did Amaral refuse to do a reconstruction in the beginning when it might have been of some use?

Do you have a cite for the alleged refusal please.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2356 on: November 01, 2020, 12:50:19 PM »
Do you have a cite for the alleged refusal please.

You mean you didn't know?  It will be on here somewhere.  There was enough fuss about it.

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2357 on: November 01, 2020, 12:53:03 PM »
You mean you didn't know?  It will be on here somewhere.  There was enough fuss about it.

Is that now an aceptable response to a request for a cite ?  Imust remember that.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2358 on: November 01, 2020, 12:55:54 PM »
Far too much to list.but.


Well, in my opinion, and others a tragic accident that could ruin the mccs I believe.carreer/family etc.

 Put them together and you have means, motive and opportunity.

Why who would want to abduct Maddie and take all that risk why would a pedo do that.

Portugal I found in 2005 had a lot of poverty shacks on beaches between Vilamoura and Albefura.

Children were freely running about, some begging. yet you never hear of them being abducted.

If someone wanted Maddie why would they emply a pedo to take her.

This case stinks and always has done. too much UK interference to ever think it was just a group of professional people on holiday.

Where a unique abduction takes place still not a shread of evidence to prove that Maddie was abducted.

Apart from a so-called open window, when there was an open door next to her bed leading to a car park

This reads like a GCSE English exam...correct spelling and punctuation in this paragraph.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2359 on: November 01, 2020, 12:58:03 PM »
Is that now an aceptable response to a request for a cite ?  Imust remember that.

When it is a silly request it is.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2360 on: November 01, 2020, 01:02:39 PM »
You mean you didn't know?  It will be on here somewhere.  There was enough fuss about it.

I've never seen a cite afaik, although I've seen the accusation before.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2361 on: November 01, 2020, 01:05:57 PM »
Do you have a cite for the alleged refusal please.


You need a question mark at the end of your question.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2362 on: November 01, 2020, 01:26:51 PM »
Is that now an aceptable response to a request for a cite ?  Imust remember that.
Shouldn't be a gap between cite and question mark but there should be a gap between I and must

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2363 on: November 01, 2020, 02:00:14 PM »
Do you have a cite for the alleged refusal please.

Yes there is a cite.

I have it.

I'll do a swop with you for it.

You give me the cites I've requested from you which you have ignored ~ and its yours.  Deal?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2364 on: November 01, 2020, 02:03:15 PM »
Is that now an aceptable response to a request for a cite ?  Imust remember that.

Studiously ignoring a request seems to work too.  But I wouldn't bother remembering that as it is a tactic which I think is wearing rather thin.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2365 on: November 01, 2020, 02:15:20 PM »
Yes there is a cite.

I have it.

I'll do a swop with you for it.

You give me the cites I've requested from you which you have ignored ~ and its yours.  Deal?

Do you really want to start a war of attrition about cites? You're not the only one who has unanswered requests for cites.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2366 on: November 01, 2020, 03:49:39 PM »
The PJ were not looking for Madeleine.  They were looking to prosecute her parents instead.

It’s not up to suspects to dictate the direction of the investigation.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2367 on: November 01, 2020, 04:11:40 PM »
It’s not up to suspects to dictate the direction of the investigation.

actually sometimes it is...and in this case the parents have forced the PJ to widen the investigation and are now looking at CB

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2368 on: November 01, 2020, 04:57:06 PM »
actually sometimes it is...and in this case the parents have forced the PJ to widen the investigation and are now looking at CB

The parents had absolutely nothing to do with that....but you already know that.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2369 on: November 01, 2020, 05:03:19 PM »
The parents had absolutely nothing to do with that....but you already know that.

It seems its you who is ignorant of the facts...CB is being invetstigated as  a direct result of an appeal on German TV by Kate and Gerry