IMO, the outcome of their "investigations" and conclusions was completely predictable and pre-judged. I watched the bit where the butch one said "They've taken her" was a red flag and that any reasonable person would simply assume their child had wandered off. The weedy one said "yeah but what about the "alleged" open window?, surely that would be an indicator that your child had been taken rather than wandered off?", but that explanation was more or less completely brushed off without any reasonable rationale apart from the implication that Kate was lying. Well, what if she WASNT lying and the window WAS found open? Then that would explain why she said what she said (even though her exact words were not recorded anyway). The whole podcast is an exercise in bias confirmation IMO, pandering to a McCann Bashing crowd who lap up this sort of propaganda as it confirms their own biases.
who lap up this sort of propaganda as it confirms their own biases.IMO aren't you doing the same with Wolt.
Why be so nasty as to call them Butch - Weedy they have done nothing to you apart from making a podcast wanted by public demand.
I have always thought that window a key to the whole thing was it left open or wasn't it.
If it wasn't why was it opened there is no real proof it was.
If like some believe Maddie woke and wandered [which is a viable probability] would mean Maddie opened it herself.
The only sense to anyone opening that window IMO was to show someone had been in to back up an abduction theory.
