Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Mr Gray]

Broadly speaking I do.  Can you find a statement that defines it?

Try Google

[Robittybob1]

Try Google

It is a matter of time and searching.   Nothing good is coming up just yet.

[Robittybob1]

Can you be sued for libel for telling the truth?
A person who wishes to successfully sue you for libel must generally prove the statement is false. In most states, truth is a complete defense to a libel action. You generally can't sue if the statement in question is true, no matter how unpleasant the statement or the results of its publication.

Might be where honest opinion comes in. 

[Robittybob1]

Do you understand what honest opinion means in relation to libel

Why should I bother to answer your questions when you hardly ever answer mine.  (Right back at you.)

[kizzy]

is this libellous yet you let it stand

FGS whatever is your problem D it's like your a post stalker you bring up a post that is over five months old ...why.

I am beginning to feel victimised by you because of my opinion three posts you quoted and a mention on another thread. accusing me of libel.

I don't believe there version of events I am not alone in this and don't believe I am in the minority.

You put your opinion [thats all it is of what you think happened] day in day out.

I am just as entitled to do the same. so kindly stop harassing me because of the posts of my opinion that have never changed in nearly fourteen years.

You have no right whatsoever to do this. when




Last month, Gerry and Kate McCann lost their Supreme Court appeal against Gonçalo Amaral, a former Portuguese police inspector, who claimed in his book The Truth of the Lie that the couple were responsible for their daughter's disappearance.

Now, Portugal's Supreme Court has ruled that neither parent has formally been proved innocent for Maddie's disappearance, and can't be assumed to be so. The couple were ruled out as 'arguidos' (formal suspects) in 2008, but judges have stressed that this does not equate to a ruling of innocence.

https://www.her.ie/news/court-rules-kate-gerry-mccann-not-proved-innocent-maddies-disappearance-332373

[Mr Gray]

FGS whatever is your problem D it's like your a post stalker you bring up a post that is over five months old ...why.

I am beginning to feel victimised by you because of my opinion three posts you quoted and a mention on another thread. accusing me of libel.

I don't believe there version of events I am not alone in this and don't believe I am in the minority.

You put your opinion [thats all it is of what you think happened] day in day out.

I am just as entitled to do the same. so kindly stop harassing me because of the posts of my opinion that have never changed in nearly fourteen years.

You have no right whatsoever to do this. when




Last month, Gerry and Kate McCann lost their Supreme Court appeal against Gonçalo Amaral, a former Portuguese police inspector, who claimed in his book The Truth of the Lie that the couple were responsible for their daughter's disappearance.

Now, Portugal's Supreme Court has ruled that neither parent has formally been proved innocent for Maddie's disappearance, and can't be assumed to be so. The couple were ruled out as 'arguidos' (formal suspects) in 2008, but judges have stressed that this does not equate to a ruling of innocence.

https://www.her.ie/news/court-rules-kate-gerry-mccann-not-proved-innocent-maddies-disappearance-332373

I never said your post were libellous.. Its Rob making the claims re libel. I didn't choose the post because you made it

[kizzy]

I never said your post were libellous.. Its Rob making the claims re libel. I didn't choose the post because you made it

You chose my posts as an example singling me out imo nothing to do with rob.

One of the posts was over five-month-old - so it must have taken some finding. to prove a silly point.

[Mr Gray]

You chose my posts as an example singling me out imo nothing to do with rob.

One of the posts was over five-month-old - so it must have taken some finding. to prove a silly point.

It took no finding.. Just went to the start of the tread and chose a couple of posts that fitted what Rob was critical of... Just happened to be yours and spams

[Eleanor]

It took no finding.. Just went to the start of the tread and chose a couple of posts that fitted what Rob was critical of... Just happened to be yours and spams

This is correct.  I did check.

[kizzy]

It took no finding.. Just went to the start of the tread and chose a couple of posts that fitted what Rob was critical of... Just happened to be yours and spams

No there wasn't any posts of spams or mention of him. -

so why are you twisting it and trying to blame others?

When it was your actions no one else.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11731.3135

[kizzy]

This is correct.  I did check.

So where was the mention of spam - it was only  Kizzy.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11731.3135

[Eleanor]

Getting fed up with this.  Please stop now.

[kizzy]

Getting fed up with this.  Please stop now.

Fine by me - I have said all I have to say about it anyway.

[kizzy]

I knew it!!  No comment = guilty as any self respecting McCann basher will tell you.

self respecting McCann basher will tell you.

Seeing its quiet I would like to ask you why do you label anyone who does not believe the mccs version of events is a mcc basher.

Do you think they should shower them with empathy sympathy etc - when in my case I believe they are involved in what happened to Maddie?

How can you call it bashing when some simply post of what they believe happened that night. when it is not set in stone or any evidence that Maddie was abducted.

Its not a bashing - just simply not beleiving there version of events that everyone has a right to do.

[barrier]

self respecting McCann basher will tell you.

Seeing its quiet I would like to ask you why do you label anyone who does not believe the mccs version of events is a mcc basher.

Do you think they should shower them with empathy sympathy etc - when in my case I believe they are involved in what happened to Maddie?

How can you call it bashing when some simply post of what they believe happened that night. when it is not set in stone or any evidence that Maddie was abducted.

Its not a bashing - just simply not beleiving there version of events that everyone has a right to do.

Those that have a low opinion of Amaral are proud of the bashing they administer, do it with pride kizzy.