Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357793 times)

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3210 on: February 14, 2021, 09:03:04 PM »
What’s he waiting for I wonder...?

I think he said something about revealing in the New Yr./Spring.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3211 on: February 14, 2021, 09:04:30 PM »
And why would CB's defence lawyer say the following if untrue:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8757067/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckners-lawyer-says-evidence-clears-client.html

Probably because he spoke to amaral
If CB is guilty then someone needs to explain what the dogs alerts were to
« Last Edit: February 14, 2021, 09:11:41 PM by Davel »

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3212 on: February 14, 2021, 09:12:50 PM »
Probably because he spoke to amaral

Why would CB's defence lawyer be in communication with a long retired member of PJ?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3213 on: February 14, 2021, 09:16:21 PM »
Probably because he spoke to amaral
If CB is guilty then someone needs to explain what the dogs alerts were to

?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3214 on: February 14, 2021, 09:18:20 PM »
Why would CB's defence lawyer be in communication with a long retired member of PJ?
Perhaps after some inside knowledge

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3215 on: February 14, 2021, 09:21:15 PM »
?

If Maddie was abducted what were the alerts to

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3216 on: February 14, 2021, 09:21:58 PM »
Why would CB's defence lawyer be in communication with a long retired member of PJ?

As one of the original investigators he has a lot of first hand knowledge about the case.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3217 on: February 14, 2021, 09:27:41 PM »
If Maddie was abducted what were the alerts to

Are you saying you now believe the alerts in this case are relevant and have meaning?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3218 on: February 14, 2021, 09:28:26 PM »
As one of the original investigators he has a lot of first hand knowledge about the case.

Yes he believes the main evidence against the McCanns was the dog alerts and the case will be solved when M15 open their files

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3219 on: February 14, 2021, 09:30:21 PM »
Are you saying you now believe the alerts in this case are relevant and have meaning?

Absolutely not.. If CB is guilty then the alerts are discredited

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3220 on: February 14, 2021, 09:30:57 PM »
As one of the original investigators he has a lot of first hand knowledge about the case.

He does indeed particularly in the areas of mode of entry and exit to 5A, something the Germans probably have little or no knowledge of, but I'm not sure FF would have access to GA?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3221 on: February 14, 2021, 09:32:13 PM »
Absolutely not.. If CB is guilty then the alerts are discredited

Afaic they were discredited anyway based on the case of Shannon Matthews. 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3222 on: February 14, 2021, 09:33:30 PM »
He does indeed particularly in the areas of mode of entry and exit to 5A, something the Germans probably have little or no knowledge of, but I'm not sure FF would have access to GA?

I expect there are ways of contacting him and asking him if he'll speak.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3223 on: February 14, 2021, 09:37:52 PM »
He does indeed particularly in the areas of mode of entry and exit to 5A, something the Germans probably have little or no knowledge of, but I'm not sure FF would have access to GA?

The germans may well have proof that Maddie  was abducted... And they may well have already visited Luz. SY have already and support abduction.
Amarals contribution according to MARK S is that the shutters could not beopened from the outside... Which of course is rubbish
« Last Edit: February 14, 2021, 09:46:24 PM by Davel »

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3224 on: February 14, 2021, 09:49:59 PM »
Almost certain

But not certain so not solved?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?