Are The Tabloids Running Scared?

[Anthro]

Was he ever branded a murderer before ?

No. And that gives me hope (or not, given the context) that he possibly sold Madeleine on. His close friends believe he sold her.

[faithlilly]

No. And that gives me hope (or not, given the context) that he possibly sold Madeleine on. His close friends believe he sold her.

His close friends will say anything as long as the tabloids are paying.

[Anthro]

His close friends will say anything as long as the tabloids are paying.

And yet, they are claiming they didn’t get any payment. In Brückner’s world, who do you expect to be part of his circle? Just because they may have a clandestine agenda, does not mean they don’t have valuable and important information about their friend.

[Anthro]

His close friends will say anything as long as the tabloids are paying.

And yet, they are claiming they didn’t get any payment. In Brückner’s world, who do you expect to be part of his circle? Just because they may have a clandestine agenda, does not mean they don’t have valuable and important information about their friend.

[faithlilly]

And yet, they are claiming they didn’t get any payment. In Brückner’s world, who do you expect to be part of his circle? Just because they may have a clandestine agenda, does not mean they don’t have valuable and important information about their friend.

Cite for claim about payment please ?

A simple question. Do you believe Amaral less because of his conviction?

[Anthro]

Cite for claim about payment please ?

A simple question. Do you believe Amaral less because of his conviction?

Amaral’s conduct and what I think of him, have reference to the police force in my country who conduct themselves in a similar manner. A simple question. Why do you doubt Wolters and BKA?

[faithlilly]

Amaral’s conduct and what I think of him, have reference to the police force in my country who conduct themselves in a similar manner. A simple question. Why do you doubt Wolters and BKA?

Not what I asked.

As to why I doubt Wolter. Simple, it’s been over four months since he claimed that he had evidence that Madeleine had been killed and Brueckner was involved yet Brueckner hasn’t been arrested never mind charged. No judicial system I have ever come across has failed to charge the accused at the first opportunity if, as Wolter claimed, they have concrete evidence against Brueckner.

BTW if Madeleine was sold, as you believe, isn’t her welfare being put at risk by Wolter by not questioning Brueckner ?

[Brietta]

His close friends will say anything as long as the tabloids are paying.

Are you insinuating that Brueckner's close friends are being paid by the tabloids?  If so you will require a cite.

[faithlilly]

Are you insinuating that Brueckner's close friends are being paid by the tabloids?  If so you will require a cite.

I’m not insinuating, I’m stating it as a fact. As to a cite I’ll gladly provide one when you show a smidgen of evenhandedness and ask Anthro for a cite for her claim that Brueckner’s friends weren’t being paid for their stories.

[Angelo222]

Not what I asked.

As to why I doubt Wolter. Simple, it’s been over four months since he claimed that he had evidence that Madeleine had been killed and Brueckner was involved yet Brueckner hasn’t been arrested never mind charged. No judicial system I have ever come across has failed to charge the accused at the first opportunity if, as Wolter claimed, they have concrete evidence against Brueckner.

BTW if Madeleine was sold, as you believe, isn’t her welfare being put at risk by Wolter by not questioning Brueckner ?

Wolter was betting on someone coming forward to incriminate Brueckner with damning info but it hasn't happened. He's looking stupid now as are those who swallowed his claims. Any decent detective who had discovered the truth about a missing child would have confided in their parents by now but again, this hasn't happened. The McCanns, if innocent, are still in the dark.

[Brietta]

I’m not insinuating, I’m stating it as a fact. As to a cite I’ll gladly provide one when you show a smidgen of evenhandedness and ask Anthro for a cite for her claim that Brueckner’s friends weren’t being paid for their stories.

Please provide a cite for your claim, thankyou

[Brietta]

Wolter was betting on someone coming forward to incriminate Brueckner with damning info but it hasn't happened. He's looking stupid now as are those who swallowed his claims. Any decent detective who had discovered the truth about a missing child would have confided in their parents by now but again, this hasn't happened. The McCanns, if innocent, are still in the dark.

Brueckner is a convicted paedophile;  he is a convicted rapist;  he is a versatile career criminal willing to turn his hand to anything from theft to drug dealing to name but two.

At the moment he is considered innocent of anything to do with Madeleine McCann and that is the official actual fact of the matter.  Why are you so keen to question the innocence of Madeleine's parents against whom there was never a shred of evidence of wrongdoing off any sort.  In particular absolutely no evidence of wrongdoing regarding Madeleine

They were crucified by the tabloids where in my opinion Brueckner was not and I have not seen a post which backs up the question of the tabloids running scared.

[John]

Brueckner is a convicted paedophile;  he is a convicted rapist;  he is a versatile career criminal willing to turn his hand to anything from theft to drug dealing to name but two.

At the moment he is considered innocent of anything to do with Madeleine McCann and that is the official actual fact of the matter.  Why are you so keen to question the innocence of Madeleine's parents against whom there was never a shred of evidence of wrongdoing off any sort.  In particular absolutely no evidence of wrongdoing regarding Madeleine

They were crucified by the tabloids where in my opinion Brueckner was not and I have not seen a post which backs up the question of the tabloids running scared.

Brueckner is a nasty piece of work and unfit to be released into society I agree but his connection with Madeleine's disappearance is extremely tenuous and in my view hangs by a very thin thread. It will indeed be interesting to see what develops in the weeks and months ahead.

[Erngath]

Brueckner is a nasty piece of work and unfit to be released into society I agree but his connection with Madeleine's disappearance is extremely tenuous and in my view hangs by a very thin thread. It will indeed be interesting to see what develops in the weeks and months ahead.

Do you believe that Wolters is a Maverick who is giving statements and interviews without permission from his superiors?
Do you believe that he is making such damming pronouncements about CB and Madeleine's fate with only the evidence you describe as "a very thin thread"?

[kizzy]

Do you believe that Wolters is a Maverick who is giving statements and interviews without permission from his superiors?
Do you believe that he is making such damming pronouncements about CB and Madeleine's fate with only the evidence you describe as "a very thin thread"?

What else can it be but a thin thread, imo he was hoping for more -  started the ball rolling and it has obviously stopped.

It seems to me everything walters says has to be taken as proof he has something ...it isn't.

GA is slated by some for doing the exact same as what CWH is doing.

GA speaks from documented police files....What is Wolters speaking from imo uncorroborated evidence.