Michael Tatschl

[Mr Gray]

Hi Rob, I think Tatschl has explained that he is also a parent now and engaged to the child’s mother. I wonder if the section in the Netflix documentary where three witnesses describe a blond man/men surveilling the McCann apartment, was the trigger for Tatschl to come forward?

I think he said a smuch in the article rob linked to

[Robittybob1]

Hi Rob, I think Tatschl has explained that he is also a parent now and engaged to the child’s mother. I wonder if the section in the Netflix documentary where three witnesses describe a blond man/men surveilling the McCann apartment, was the trigger for Tatschl to come forward?

Are you a Netflix subscriber?  I did for a while but have stopped now so I can't recheck what was said. 

I think he said as much in the article rob linked to

But what has he said that convinces you he is being truthful?  In most cases, I'd say the best for Tatschl would be to stay quiet and say nothing at all.

[Anthro]

Are you a Netflix subscriber?  I did for a while but have stopped now so I can't recheck what was said. 
But what has he said that convinces you he is being truthful?  In most cases, I'd say the best for Tatschl would be to stay quiet and say nothing at all.

I am a subscriber and the documentary is still available. Tell me what to check and I’ll let you know.

[Mr Gray]

Are you a Netflix subscriber?  I did for a while but have stopped now so I can't recheck what was said. 
But what has he said that convinces you he is being truthful?  In most cases, I'd say the best for Tatschl would be to stay quiet and say nothing at all.

why should he lie about susch a small detail. Theres lots that suggests hes truthfull...you and others will not agree..no problem.

Ive said for years stranger abduction was the most probable and I think it will be proven

[faithlilly]

why should he lie about susch a small detail. Theres lots that suggests hes truthfull...you and others will not agree..no problem.

Ive said for years stranger abduction was the most probable and I think it will be proven

Maybe it was a quid pro quo? Perhaps he had been picked up for some illicit behaviour, he is a criminal after all, and made a deal with the police ? After all they would know he was friends with Brueckner and, if it is true that they’ve had Brueckner in their sights since 2017, this might have been the perfect opportunity to nail him.

[Robittybob1]

I am a subscriber and the documentary is still available. Tell me what to check and I’ll let you know.

I was just thinking what it would be in the Netflix documentary that made Tatschl think it was Christian B who was around the Tapas Restaurant and apartments beyond it being anyone else? 

[Robittybob1]

why should he lie about susch a small detail. Theres lots that suggests hes truthfull...you and others will not agree..no problem.

Ive said for years stranger abduction was the most probable and I think it will be proven

You'd really need to be a bit more specific than just saying "There are lots that suggest he's truthful".   I'm looking for facts.

Why should he lie?   That depends on how involved he was with CB.

[Robittybob1]

Quid pro quo ("something for something" in Latin) is a Latin phrase used in English to mean an exchange of goods or services, in which one transfer is contingent upon the other; "a favor for a favor".

[faithlilly]

Quid pro quo ("something for something" in Latin) is a Latin phrase used in English to mean an exchange of goods or services, in which one transfer is contingent upon the other; "a favor for a favor".

Exactly. Tatschi gives the police ‘information’ and in return they make evidence of wrongdoing disappear.

[Robittybob1]

Exactly. Tatschi gives the police ‘information’ and in return they make evidence of wrongdoing disappear.

Theoretically, this is possible.   If you recall right from the beginning I enquired if it was possible to discuss "Michael Tatschl"  and we were warned not to venture into libel.

We mustn't say this is a fact.   We can't even have an opinion that " Tatschl gives the police ‘information’ and in return they make evidence of wrongdoing disappear."  Both would be libelous unless the idea was discussed as a theoretical possibility.

I'm afraid all the work I've done to present this thread will be lost if we develop this theory any further. 

[faithlilly]

Theoretically, this is possible.   If you recall right from the beginning I enquired if it was possible to discuss "Michael Tatschl"  and we were warned not to venture into libel.

We mustn't say this is a fact.   We can't even have an opinion that " Tatschl gives the police ‘information’ and in return they make evidence of wrongdoing disappear."  Both would be libelous unless the idea was discussed as a theoretical possibility.

I'm afraid all the work I've done to present this thread will be lost if we develop this theory any further.

Imo it is a theoretical possibility...

[Robittybob1]

Imo it is a theoretical possibility...

There is a level above the moderators.   

[faithlilly]

There is a level above the moderators.

Does the level above have any training in libel law ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Erm, why would the Germans want to frame CB for the abduction and murder of a British child who went missing in Portugal?

[barrier]

Erm, why would the Germans want to frame CB for the abduction and murder of a British child who went missing in Portugal?

Why use the term frame, if latest press reports are a bellwether imo the BKA have been sold a pup, one report suggest they acted upon less than solid Intel to under go a search of property,whether this Intel came from the guy in relation to the thread title is another matter.