Author Topic: Michael Tatschl  (Read 48205 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #90 on: November 16, 2020, 09:10:31 PM »
I can prove it on the balance of probabilities...which as this is not a criminal case should suffice

Off you go then...oh but before you do can I remind you that Brietta hides her on line status.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #91 on: November 16, 2020, 09:15:10 PM »
Off you go then...oh but before you do can I remind you that Brietta hides her on line status.

you need to read my post again...it reads I can ...not I will. I'm sure brietta doesnt have  a problem with my daimler

« Last Edit: November 16, 2020, 09:38:21 PM by Davel »

Offline faithlilly

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #92 on: November 16, 2020, 09:43:48 PM »
you need to read my post again...it reads I can ...not I will. I'm sure brietta doesnt have  a problem with my daimler

Prove your accusation or withdraw it.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #93 on: November 16, 2020, 09:49:16 PM »
Prove your accusation or withdraw it.

You need to understand..you don't make the rules...so I will do neither

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #94 on: November 16, 2020, 09:54:28 PM »

I never said he did.  He is claiming CB is involved in some way is he not?
I think this question is more on topic than a lot of the other comments.  What does Michael Tatschl actually say against Christian B?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #95 on: November 16, 2020, 09:57:12 PM »
I think this question is more on topic than a lot of the other comments.  What does Michael Tatschl actually say against Christian B?
I think most of us who have followed the case understand what he said...he certainly doesn't say CB admitted it to him

Offline faithlilly

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #96 on: November 16, 2020, 10:03:56 PM »
You need to understand..you don't make the rules...so I will do neither

A ‘certain’ mod and Brietta in her bunker...you can’t prove it. Fair enough.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #97 on: November 16, 2020, 10:06:39 PM »
A ‘certain’ mod and Brietta in her bunker...you can’t prove it. Fair enough.
If it was important I would...but you are not..fair enough

Offline Eleanor

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #98 on: November 16, 2020, 10:07:14 PM »
"Reply To Deleted Comment."

Not a lot to be done about those.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #99 on: November 16, 2020, 10:49:18 PM »
If it was important I would...but you are not..fair enough

Your MO is transparent..make a claim, be unable to substantiate it, call the poster who questions you illogical, unimportant (........) insert insult here. It’s becoming tiresome.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #100 on: November 16, 2020, 10:50:46 PM »
"Reply To Deleted Comment."

Not a lot to be done about those.

I’ve been really surprised at the lack of loyalty amongst mods in the last few months.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #101 on: November 16, 2020, 10:57:53 PM »
I’ve been really surprised at the lack of loyalty amongst mods in the last few months.

My comment was entirely in support of Mods.  We all have to cope with Replies to Deleted Comments.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #102 on: November 16, 2020, 11:06:18 PM »
My comment was entirely in support of Mods.  We all have to cope with Replies to Deleted Comments.

This still stands

‘Thanks for making me laugh..a certain senior mod was online when it was removed..one of your posts quoting it removed too’

Now I don’t know who it relates to ( although not Brietta as she does not display her online status ) but I would have thought that in fairness to all mods it should have been removed.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #103 on: November 16, 2020, 11:08:54 PM »
^^^yawn^^^ Does anyone understand this particular tantrum?  It’s not like Davel was accusing anyone of wanting Madeleine to have suffered at the hands if a vicious paedophile or anything.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Michael Tatschl
« Reply #104 on: November 16, 2020, 11:13:55 PM »
I’ve been really surprised at the lack of loyalty amongst mods in the last few months.
Moderators should really work independently without bias IMO.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.