Will 2021 Bring About A Resolution?

[Eleanor]

They would have been able to do a better job had the English police cooperated instead of thwarting nearly every request.  Amaral was right to publicly criticise them imo.

How many individual requests were there and for what?

[Holly Goodhead]

Of course they don't. Have they ever been expected to? Not that I can recall. I share Colin Sutton's surprise, however, that Operation Grange made no effort to eliminate them from involvement in their daughter's disappearance. As he said;

To eliminate or implicate those closest to the child in this type of case is not only the documented best investigative practice but is common sense.
http://colinsutton.blogspot.com/2017/05/madeleine-mccann-and-operation-grange_9.html

What is meant by closest?

Caregiver close or geographical proximity close?

McCanns - former
My suspects - latter
CB - no evidence of being the former or latter

[Vertigo Swirl]

What is meant by closest?

Caregiver close or geographical proximity close?

McCanns - former
My suspects - latter
CB - no evidence of being the former or latter

Can please supply evidence that your suspects were physically the closest to Madeleine McCann on the night of her disappearance, thanks.

[Holly Goodhead]

Can please supply evidence that your suspects were physically the closest to Madeleine McCann on the night of her disappearance, thanks.

Its in the wit stat.

If the Mc's are innocent, PF was closest to MM in terms of geographical proximity other than the perp(s).

[Vertigo Swirl]

Its in the wit stat.

If the Mc's are innocent, PF was closest to MM in terms of geographical proximity other than the perp(s).

So PF is your prime suspect now is she?

[Holly Goodhead]

So PF is your prime suspect now is she?

Plse refer to my tagline.  I remain steadfast 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Plse refer to my tagline.  I remain steadfast 

But there is no evidence in the files that your suspects were anywhere near Madeleine McCann when she disappeared some time after 8,30 pm on 3rd May 2007

[Holly Goodhead]

But there is no evidence in the files that your suspects were anywhere near Madeleine McCann when she disappeared some time after 8,30 pm on 3rd May 2007

Of course there's no evidence because the wit stats were taken at face value and afaik remain uncorroborated. 

There's no evidence CB was anywhere near MM when she disappeared some time after 8.30pm on 3rd May 2007 but it doesn't stop many pointing the finger at him. 

As CS said the investigation needed to go back to basics and look closely at all those who were in close proximity to MM in the hours before she disappeared including house-to-house enquiries. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Of course there's no evidence because the wit stats were taken at face value and afaik remain uncorroborated. 

There's no evidence CB was anywhere near MM when she disappeared some time after 8.30pm on 3rd May 2007 but it doesn't stop many pointing the finger at him. 

As CS said the investigation needed to go back to basics and look closely at all those who were in close proximity to MM in the hours before she disappeared including house-to-house enquiries.

I'm glad you agree there is no evidence to support your view because your posts yesterday would tend to suggest otherwise:

What is meant by closest?

Caregiver close or geographical proximity close?

McCanns - former
My suspects - latter
CB - no evidence of being the former or latter

"Can please supply evidence that your suspects were physically the closest to Madeleine McCann on the night of her disappearance, thanks".

Its in the wit stat.

Misleading, what?

[Mr Gray]

Of course there's no evidence because the wit stats were taken at face value and afaik remain uncorroborated. 

There's no evidence CB was anywhere near MM when she disappeared some time after 8.30pm on 3rd May 2007 but it doesn't stop many pointing the finger at him. 

As CS said the investigation needed to go back to basics and look closely at all those who were in close proximity to MM in the hours before she disappeared including house-to-house enquiries.

Do you really think Wolters would say what he has said based on no evidence....i think thats absurd. CS is not leading the investigation ..Wolters is now

[Holly Goodhead]

I'm glad you agree there is no evidence to support your view because your posts yesterday would tend to suggest otherwise:

Misleading, what?

Depends what you mean by evidence?

[Holly Goodhead]

Do you really think Wolters would say what he has said based on no evidence....i think thats absurd. CS is not leading the investigation ..Wolters is now

BKA/HCW are not leading the investigation.  I would remind you of the initial statements put out by BKA which are far more circumspect than HCW beating the drum:
 https://www.bka.de/DE/IhreSicherheit/Fahndungen/Personen/BekanntePersonen/43_Jaehriger_Deutscher_TV/Sachverhalt.html

https://www.bka.de/DE/Presse/Listenseite_Pressemitteilungen/2020/Presse2020/200603_pmZeugenaufrufStABraunschweig.html

HCW is a prosecutor.  Prosecutors beat the drum.  Listen to prosecutors' opening arguments at criminal trials.  They will tell the trial the defendent is guilty regardless of whether the case is weak or strong and their personal beliefs.  Its what prosecutors do. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Depends what you mean by evidence?

The same thing you mean by evidence when dismissing CB as a suspect claiming there isn't any. 

[Mr Gray]

BKA/HCW are not leading the investigation.  I would remind you of the initial statements put out by BKA which are far more circumspect than HCW beating the drum:
 https://www.bka.de/DE/IhreSicherheit/Fahndungen/Personen/BekanntePersonen/43_Jaehriger_Deutscher_TV/Sachverhalt.html

https://www.bka.de/DE/Presse/Listenseite_Pressemitteilungen/2020/Presse2020/200603_pmZeugenaufrufStABraunschweig.html

HCW is a prosecutor.  Prosecutors beat the drum.  Listen to prosecutors' opening arguments at criminal trials.  They will tell the trial the defendent is guilty regardless of whether the case is weak or strong and their personal beliefs.  Its what prosecutors do.

HCW is not only leading the investigation he will lead any prosecution against CB. No other force has claimed concrete evidence

[Holly Goodhead]

The same thing you mean by evidence when dismissing CB as a suspect claiming there isn't any.

An independent witness (PF) confirmed my suspects were only metres away from MM shortly before she disappeared.  Furthermore my suspect admitted to being only metres away from MM shortly before she disappeared.  What evidence exists showing CB was anywhere near 5A/MM shortly before she disappeared?