Will 2021 Bring About A Resolution?

[G-Unit]

what do you consider to be “real evidence” of McCann involvement then?

It's more a case of no evidence which eliminates them.

[Eleanor]

It's more a case of no evidence which eliminates them.

That ought to be funny.  "No evidence which eliminates them."

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's more a case of no evidence which eliminates them.

Wha?  Wait a minute.  Firstly, you disputed with Davel the “reality” of the evidence the PJ have, suggesting that Davel is wrong to say there is no real evidence of McCann involvement.  Secondly there is evidence which eliminates them but because it mostly comes from the Tapas group you have decided it’s not “real”.  So, I ask again what is the “real” evidence that suggests McCann involvement? 

[barrier]

That ought to be funny.  "No evidence which eliminates them."

Thats a stance against CB at the moment by many on here.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Thats a stance against CB at the moment by many on here.

So is it a stance you agree with in principle or disagree with?

[Brietta]

It's more a case of no evidence which eliminates them.

"It's more a case of no evidence which eliminates them."

I think it would be well worth you - stepping back - and having a right good, long think about that post in context.

It definitely suggests the WOW factor to me.

[G-Unit]

Wha?  Wait a minute.  Firstly, you disputed with Davel the “reality” of the evidence the PJ have, suggesting that Davel is wrong to say there is no real evidence of McCann involvement.  Secondly there is evidence which eliminates them but because it mostly comes from the Tapas group you have decided it’s not “real”.  So, I ask again what is the “real” evidence that suggests McCann involvement?

'Real' evidence is a concept invented by Davel, imo, so it means nothing to me. Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion, because evident things are undoubted. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence)

So evidence, it seems, needs to be something which is evident. Evident means easily seen or understood.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/evident

The evidence given by the holiday group is not easy to see or understand, so cannot be described as undoubted. People disagree with each other, with the group statement they prepared, and, in some cases, with their own statements. Their evidence is also disagreed with by other people's statements.

[Eleanor]

Thats a stance against CB at the moment by many on here.

I don't know because Brueckner isn't saying anything at the moment.  And I don't know of who else is saying otherwise.

[Eleanor]

'Real' evidence is a concept invented by Davel, imo, so it means nothing to me. Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion, because evident things are undoubted. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence)

So evidence, it seems, needs to be something which is evident. Evident means easily seen or understood.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/evident

The evidence given by the holiday group is not easy to see or understand, so cannot be described as undoubted. People disagree with each other, with the group statement they prepared, and, in some cases, with their own statements. Their evidence is also disagreed with by other people's statements.

But there is No Evidence against The McCanns.  Otherwise it would have been produced.

However, if you think that No Evidence to suggest that they are Innocent is proof of Guilt then you are on a very sticky wicket and defying all of the rules of Innocent until Proven Guilty.

Good luck with that one.

[Brietta]

'Real' evidence is a concept invented by Davel, imo, so it means nothing to me. Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion, because evident things are undoubted. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence)

So evidence, it seems, needs to be something which is evident. Evident means easily seen or understood.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/evident

The evidence given by the holiday group is not easy to see or understand, so cannot be described as undoubted. People disagree with each other, with the group statement they prepared, and, in some cases, with their own statements. Their evidence is also disagreed with by other people's statements.

Fourteen years down the line from Madeleine's disappearance and you are unable to move on with events as they change ~ really very sad.

Fortunately investigators haven't become mired in the same old time time warp and are following evidence which suggests that the truth about what actually happened to Madeleine might be resolved.

Time to move on I think ~ events have been revealing exactly how wasteful the time and energy spent on the vitriol like yours heaped on an innocent holiday party has actually been.

There is a "thinking chair" in my grandson's nursery which the children can use to think about how naughty they may have been.  I recommend the use of one for those unable to keep pace with current events and to work out just exactly what the definition of 'evidence' actually is..

[jassi]

Fourteen years down the line from Madeleine's disappearance and you are unable to move on with events as they change ~ really very sad.

Fortunately investigators haven't become mired in the same old time time warp and are following evidence which suggests that the truth about what actually happened to Madeleine might be resolved.

Time to move on I think ~ events have been revealing exactly how wasteful the time and energy spent on the vitriol like yours heaped on an innocent holiday has actually been.

There is a "thinking chair" in my grandson's nursery which the children can use to think about how naughty they may have been.  I recommend the use of one for those unable to keep pace with current events and to work out just exactly what the definition of 'evidence' actually is..

Instead of proclaiming how wrong people are why not let events just take their course ?

[G-Unit]

Fourteen years down the line from Madeleine's disappearance and you are unable to move on with events as they change ~ really very sad.

Fortunately investigators haven't become mired in the same old time time warp and are following evidence which suggests that the truth about what actually happened to Madeleine might be resolved.

Time to move on I think ~ events have been revealing exactly how wasteful the time and energy spent on the vitriol like yours heaped on an innocent holiday party has actually been.

There is a "thinking chair" in my grandson's nursery which the children can use to think about how naughty they may have been.  I recommend the use of one for those unable to keep pace with current events and to work out just exactly what the definition of 'evidence' actually is..

It's only possible to move on when unanswered questions are answered.

[Mr Gray]

'Real' evidence is a concept invented by Davel, imo, so it means nothing to me. Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion, because evident things are undoubted. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence)

So evidence, it seems, needs to be something which is evident. Evident means easily seen or understood.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/evident

The evidence given by the holiday group is not easy to see or understand, so cannot be described as undoubted. People disagree with each other, with the group statement they prepared, and, in some cases, with their own statements. Their evidence is also disagreed with by other people's statements.

I often say posters dont understand the evidence and I think you have just proved my point...imo you have confused yourself as to what evidence is.
You post that evidence has to be evident and evident things are undoubted.
Mr smith has doubts as to whether his sighting is Gerry...hes 60 to 80 % sure ...therefore he has 40 to 20% doubt. His sighting is not eveident ....he has doubt...so according to your definition the Smith sighting is not evidence.

[Lace]

Smiths statement saying he was 60-80% sure it was Gerry by the way he carried his child down the steps of the aeroplane!!!   He said he put his head down,  well he would to see where he was going he was on the steps and carrying Sean.   The man Smith saw put his head down as he didn't want to show his face.  IMO

[Lace]

It's only possible to move on when unanswered questions are answered.

What unanswered questions?