What is wrong about this YouTube summary -Meet the Suspects video?

[Vertigo Swirl]

As are we all. Some are placing their faith in Wolters having something more, but he admits that whatever it is it doesn't justify an arrest.

Speculating is pointless.  Give the German investigation the benefit of the doubt and wait and see what pans out. instead of making (largely critical) pronouncements about what you think is going on behind the scenes. IMO.

[G-Unit]

Speculating is pointless.  Give the German investigation the benefit of the doubt and wait and see what pans out. instead of making (largely critical) pronouncements about what you think is going on behind the scenes. IMO.

It is, but there's plenty of it going on, mostly by those who are keen to believe that the latest suspect is the perpetrator imo.

[Mr Gray]

It is, but there's plenty of it going on, mostly by those who are keen to believe that the latest suspect is the perpetrator imo.

speculation based on evidence

[Vertigo Swirl]

It is, but there's plenty of it going on, mostly by those who are keen to believe that the latest suspect is the perpetrator imo.

I’m not, if that comment was aimed at me?  I take it all at face value and don’t suppose to know what is going on behind the scenes of this investigation.

[G-Unit]

speculation based on evidence

What evidence?

[Mr Gray]

What evidence?

Evidence...that which supports  a proposition...there is quite  a lot that impliactes him

[G-Unit]

Evidence...that which supports  a proposition...there is quite  a lot that impliactes him

Really? Perhaps you could identify this evidence that implicates him?

[Mr Gray]

Really? Perhaps you could identify this evidence that implicates him?

You are aware of it and are just playing a silly game. I'm saying evidence...not proof

[G-Unit]

You are aware of it and are just playing a silly game. I'm saying evidence...not proof

I would like to know which evidence you are referring to nevertheless.

[Mr Gray]

I would like to know which evidence you are referring to nevertheless.

all the evidence in the public domain which you are fully aware of...testimonies from friends for instance.

you may think its unreliable but that isn't the point. its evidence and it would be up to a court to decide if it wa srelaible  not an armchair detective

[Robittybob1]

all the evidence in the public domain which you are fully aware of...testimonies from friends for instance.

you may think its unreliable but that isn't the point. its evidence and it would be up to a court to decide if it wa srelaible  not an armchair detective

All your so-called evidence could all just be coincidental. 

[jassi]

All your so-called evidence could all just be coincidental.

Or perhaps constructed by media to paint a worse picture than is the truth.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Or perhaps constructed by media to paint a worse picture than is the truth.

Or perhaps it’s all part of a cunning plot stitiched together by the police authorities of three countries to lull the McCanns into a false sense of security before they finally pounce on them and cart them off to jail.

[jassi]

Or perhaps it’s all part of a cunning plot stitiched together by the police authorities of three countries to lull the McCanns into a false sense of security before they finally pounce on them and cart them off to jail.

If you wish to interpret it in that way, who am I to disagree ?

[Mr Gray]

All your so-called evidence could all just be coincidental.

It's still evidence...you are now speculating..it's up to the court to decide