What is wrong about this YouTube summary -Meet the Suspects video?

[faithlilly]

I think you need to do a lot more research...start with the Michael stone case. AFAIAA all police forces use informers...most who come from a criminal background...imo...although cites supporting this have already been posted

But we know what happened in the Michael Stone case don’t we? Shall I post the cite again ?

[Robittybob1]

hi misty...when you have time could you please supply a cite to support your claim

It would be multiple citations followed by analysis.  Are you going to accept it?

[Robittybob1]

I think you need to do a lot more research...start with the Michael stone case. AFAIAA all police forces use informers...most who come from a criminal background...imo...although cites supporting this have already been posted

Do you really think Brueckner left that incriminating video in his video camera for 10 years?  That is beyond belief IMO.

[Mr Gray]

It would be multiple citations followed by analysis.  Are you going to accept it?

could you let misty answer the post....cites are required...not excuses

[Robittybob1]

I don’t think one needs to be Sherlock Holmes to work out who gave you the warnings tbh...

Please leave her alone.  Leave the Moderators to do their work in peace. Love etc. Without hate, free of Karma.

could you let misty answer the post....cites are required...not excuses

I was correcting your English - there won't be one cite but multiple citations and analysis.

[Mr Gray]

Please leave her alone.  Leave the Moderators to do their work in peace. Love etc. Without hate, free of Karma.

I was correcting your English - there won't be one cite but multiple citations and analysis.

thats fine but without a cite it cant be claimed as a fact.  It really is simple

[Robittybob1]

thats fine but without a cite it cant be claimed as a fact.  It really is simple

Was it ever claimed as a fact?

[Mr Gray]

Was it ever claimed as a fact?

yes

[Robittybob1]

yes

I think Misty presented her analysis. Was it Faithlilly who quoted it?  VS objected to it.  And we argue the validity of it.

[Mr Gray]

I think Misty presented her analysis. Was it Faithlilly who quoted it?  VS objected to it.  And we argue the validity of it.

I didnt argue anything..try and get your facts right... I merely asked for  acite

[Robittybob1]

I didnt argue anything..try and get your facts right... I merely asked for  a cite

If you agreed with it would you still ask for a cite?

[Mr Gray]

If you agreed with it would you still ask for a cite?

I dont think its true...why is it that when im asked to provide  a cite my post is altered...but when I ask for a cite it creates  a50 post discussion. Just ask misty to provide a cite

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think Misty presented her analysis. Was it Faithlilly who quoted it?  VS objected to it.  And we argue the validity of it.

I objected to Faithlilly using another member’s post (which in itself contained no cite) to try and make a point.

[Robittybob1]

I objected to Faithlilly using another member’s post (which in itself contained no cite) to try and make a point.

But did you think Misty's analysis to be wrong?  I admit I couldn't tell if it was right or wrong as I don't follow the news about CB that intently.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Please leave her alone.  Leave the Moderators to do their work in peace. Love etc. Without hate, free of Karma.

I was correcting your English - there won't be one cite but multiple citations and analysis.

What’s the big deal?  I simply said it’s pretty obvious who handed out the warning, why so sensitive?