You didnt answer the question which leads me to beleive you dont know. You list the evidence which you claim shows him innocent but not the evidence the court used to find him guilty.
The lack of alibi has only just been raised today.....I wonder what else there is.
Obviously you put two and two together and made five but don’t worry we’ll make mistakes.
The main thrust of the evidence was the now discredited witness testimony.
BTW was the BBC programme you mentioned this one ?
‘ In May and June 2017, the case was scrutinised in The Chillenden Murders, a two-part BBC Two programme in which a team of independent experts re-examined the evidence.[6] The Telegraph summarised the television programme by stating, "According to the BBC, new details, uncovered during the making of the documentary, raise the possibility that the wrong man may have been convicted."[19] Two of the legal experts who took part in the programme – prominent defence barrister Stephen Kamlisch and legal expert Sheryl Nwosu – believe there are significant doubts regarding the conviction and are now working on Stone's behalf to have the case re-examined with the aim of launching a third appeal against the conviction.’
