Discovery Plus new 3 part documentary Feb 2021

[Angelo222]

Please keep all replies civil. Cheers

[kizzy]

Yes I believe you can mock Amaral for his belief that Calpol is a sedative, for his belief that MI5 are involved in a cover-up, for believing the McCanns used a hire car to transport Madeleine's corpse 23 days after her death, for also suggesting that her body was hidden in a coffin in the church, for deliberately misleading the public wrt to Bruckner's appearance and that of his van at the time of the disappearance, for his criminal record and proven history of deceit and fraud, for his penchant for tacky ear decorations, the list is almost endless.  When HCW amasses even half the number of mockable transgressions then I would agree he too would be an acceptable target, but as yet I don't believe he has done anything yet to merit that level of scorn.

You don't really know anything about him.

Apart from IMO him being a chancer hoping it seems he will get the info that at the moment [10 months later] doesn't seem to be there. wonder what his success rate as a prosecutor is

He does seem to me to be a bit low rank the way he is going about everything. IMO

[Holly Goodhead]

You don't really know anything about him.

Apart from IMO him being a chancer hoping it seems he will get the info that at the moment [10 months later] doesn't seem to be there. wonder what his success rate as a prosecutor is

He does seem to me to be a bit low rank the way he is going about everything. IMO

Suits look a bit rank imo.  His facial expressions also seem a bit off imo.  He appears to reslish the limelight and being all cryptic.  Its possible he features at the top end on various personality trait spectrums.  FF comes over as polished and professional. 

Contrast the restrained media coverage over Wayne Couzens, charged, against the unrestrained coverage over CB who has yet to be even questioned. 

[Holly Goodhead]

https://www.beds.ac.uk/news/2020/june/be-cautious-of-new-mccann-evidence-until-charges-are-made-professor-warns/

[Vertigo Swirl]

Suits look a bit rank imo.  His facial expressions also seem a bit off imo.  He appears to reslish the limelight and being all cryptic.  Its possible he features at the top end on various personality trait spectrums.  FF comes over as polished and professional. 

Contrast the restrained media coverage over Wayne Couzens, charged, against the unrestrained coverage over CB who has yet to be even questioned.

There is no comparison between the two cases.  On was a live case, obviously with hot lead(s) to follow and a suspect in custody within a week, the other is a case of a missing child who disappeared over 13 years ago, a case which the Germans DID pursue in complete silence and media blackout for years until such a point where they felt it necessary to appeal to the public for help.  Had the Everard case dragged on without leads, definitive evidenceor a body for 13 years I'm sure it would not have been out of the question for the police to find themselves in a similar position as the German police are now.  As for your observations on HCW's suits and mannerisms, isn't that scraping the barrel somewhat? 

[barrier]

He doesn't say HE has doubts he means if there is any reason for doubt in a court of law the suspect could get off.   Like with the Submarine murder case - it was absolutely obvious what went on, the investigators had no doubt, but they needed the crucial piece of evidence that proved it before the suspect could be tried for murder.  Why you should find it necessary to mock the man's efforts for trying his best to find this evidence is beyond me quite frankly.

His title is prosecutor is it not, so he knows full well he's got the sum total of nothing to take to court.

[Mr Gray]

Suits look a bit rank imo.  His facial expressions also seem a bit off imo.  He appears to reslish the limelight and being all cryptic.  Its possible he features at the top end on various personality trait spectrums.  FF comes over as polished and professional. 

Contrast the restrained media coverage over Wayne Couzens, charged, against the unrestrained coverage over CB who has yet to be even questioned.

I think you are simply trying to interpret the facts to fit your long held opinion and find it hard to accept Wolters may well have evidence that proves you and others wrong. I think he has near enough proof of death based on what he has said but not enough to prove CBs involvement. To me he comes over as professional and capablle   frustrated that he cannot say more than has.

[Holly Goodhead]

There is no comparison between the two cases.  On was a live case, obviously with hot lead(s) to follow and a suspect in custody within a week, the other is a case of a missing child who disappeared over 13 years ago, a case which the Germans DID pursue in complete silence and media blackout for years until such a point where they felt it necessary to appeal to the public for help.  Had the Everard case dragged on without leads, definitive evidenceor a body for 13 years I'm sure it would not have been out of the question for the police to find themselves in a similar position as the German police are now.  As for your observations on HCW's suits and mannerisms, isn't that scraping the barrel somewhat?

The fact you see no comparison doesn't make it so:

https://www.beds.ac.uk/news/2020/june/be-cautious-of-new-mccann-evidence-until-charges-are-made-professor-warns/

I haven't commented on HCW's mannerisms. 

[Mr Gray]

The fact you see no comparison doesn't make it so:

https://www.beds.ac.uk/news/2020/june/be-cautious-of-new-mccann-evidence-until-charges-are-made-professor-warns/

I haven't commented on HCW's mannerisms.

That sytement was amde at the start of June...Wolters has said more since then.

[Vertigo Swirl]

His title is prosecutor is it not, so he knows full well he's got the sum total of nothing to take to court.

How do I know what he’s got and more to the point how do you?

[Vertigo Swirl]

The fact you see no comparison doesn't make it so:

https://www.beds.ac.uk/news/2020/june/be-cautious-of-new-mccann-evidence-until-charges-are-made-professor-warns/

I haven't commented on HCW's mannerisms.

”his facial expressions seem a bit off”.  Whaaaaaat?  You also seem to be suggesting he is on the autistic spectrum.  Whaaaaaaaaat?

[Holly Goodhead]

I think you are simply trying to interpret the facts to fit your long held opinion and find it hard to accept Wolters may well have evidence that proves you and others wrong. I think he has near enough proof of death based on what he has said but not enough to prove CBs involvement. To me he comes over as professional and capablle   frustrated that he cannot say more than has.

I'm sure we all suffer from confirmation bias to some degree Davel.  I always said from day 1 it was going nowhere with CB. 

[Holly Goodhead]

”his facial expressions seem a bit off”.  Whaaaaaat?  You also seem to be suggesting he is on the autistic spectrum.  Whaaaaaaaaat?

Facial expressions are not mannerisms.  I haven't mentioned autistic spectrum. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm sure we all suffer from confirmation bias to some degree Davel.  I always said from day 1 it was going nowhere with CB.

Do you have a cite?  Day one, you saying it’s going nowhere.  Should be on this forum somewhere.

[Mr Gray]

I'm sure we all suffer from confirmation bias to some degree Davel.  I always said from day 1 it was going nowhere with CB.

And i have said Im confident wolters has the evidence he claims....quite possibly photographic.