Shane was rightly warned of the consequences of committing perjury. He admitted in court that his mother had influenced his initial statement and we all know what that means in reality.
Do you really really really think that Shane Mitchell wouldn't have spoken out if he was wronged in some way?
He has kept quiet for 17 years and for good reason imo.
Were any of the other witnesses warned of the consequences of committing perjury? What about Janine Jones and Steven Kelly who we know gave evidence in court that was different from their initial statements. Were they warned?
And as to your question...he experienced directly the absolute nightmare that swirled around his family for years. He’s been a firsthand witness to the vilification of his mum and others who have defended his brother. I don’t blame him for not wanting to get involved.
Now to my question. If Shane said now that he had lied on the stand, would you believe him?