It's interesting how one simply keeps on turning things on to others. The silent protest today saw around 30 people, maybe slightly more turn out for what is described as making history (By Ms Lean). Of course, it is making history, any engine searches into the future will mention the handing over of a petition. However, it is the MSP's who are being blasted, they knew right up until yesterday the petition was going to be getting taken into the Scottish Parliament, they are at fault for not all being there to greet them, not the claimed supporters of innocence who did NOT turn up to support the event themselves! They (The group members) have been getting polls carried out for days trying to determine who would be there.
It is all very sad at points, the people who actually have joined into taken this innocence claim seriously are not aware of the deception at play to gain their support. There is NO pride to be had Ms Lean, nor of course Mr Forbes in gaining support by deception. It is the furthest thing that 'pride' can be applied to
25K signatures is indeed and accomplishment not to be sniffed at, but not to lose sight that it is a worldwide petition, social media rampant last year with tag a friend to get it signed. Ms Leans attempts recently to get even those who believed in guilt to knock it up to the 25K mark. But and again, the bias and deception, with most signing simply taken up a few seconds of their life and thinking no more of it, fail to realise the deception at play.
We were discussing the reality around this recently, again that failure, that IF Mitchell had walked free from court, there would NOT have been any investigation into finding an alternate killer, it would simply have meant there would have been insufficient evidence in strength to convict in law the factual killer. Far too black and white with no middle ground, this professing him innocent and searching for their imaginary real killer! As I have pointed out many times, the type of evidence presented in Mitchell's case cannot be scrubbed out. One can produce as many imaginary others as one pleases, it does not cancel out the evidence against Mitchell.
I mentioned recently to Mr Forbes, who I see by the latest report in the media has increased his 6yr lie to 12yrs now of being Mitchell's lawyer, that his continuous evasion of the evidence will not make it disappear, that without any doubt he appears to actually know very little himself - Specifically chosen it would seem to be the full-on voice of Mitchell in this full-blown smear campaign. Where piece by piece he is in fact exposing this farce yet simply too dim to see this it would seem. I feel Ms Lean is going to soon run out of "He is simply mistaken -------------"
