Ana Azaria
(Edit: This is an updated version of todays post with some amendments, we just wanted to clarify some details)
Remember, remember…Luke’s trial started in November.
During the trial the prosecution used certain aspects of Luke’s life to portray a ‘bad character’ and twisted and stretched anything to back up a bad character including using a visit to a tattoo shop for a tattoo on Luke on October after the murder, no relation to the time of Jodi’s murder. Luke’s mum accompanied Luke to get a tattoo while he was underage. A tattoo artist from the shop said that a fake ID had been produced along with a form stating that Luke was old enough to receive a tattoo. This was put to the jury to demonstrate his mum CM was capable of lying and covering up for Luke along with Luke’s older brother SM. However, the shop were unable to provide a copy of said photographic ID (it is a known practice for tattoo shops to keep photocopies of ID's to cover themselves in the event that someone is underage). The name given from the fake ID was actually a man in his late 50's who said that neither Luke or his mum had had access to his identification documents. It was never questioned why, if such an ID had been presented, the tattoo shop would have accepted a photographic ID of a much older man.
This being put to the jury was in no way at all related to what happened to Jodi and the judge explicitly told the jury that this evidence was being led in order to discredit CM. Later in the trial the charges against both SM and CM were dropped without the jury knowing this.
The jury are told this tattoo was a satanic kind, and dark. The tattoo apprentice witness goes on to say the tattoo that Luke got was similar to the one she had, which she described as ‘not quite demonic…but it’s dark art’. The use of these sorts of words are going to stay with the jury, Lots of negative and sinister words being linked to Luke.
With no direct evidence to link Luke to Jodi’s murder the use of a fingerprint expert was brought in in relation to Luke’s visit to the tattoo shop. They brought a Senior Fingerprint Expert to match Luke’s fingerprint on the consent form. When thinking about the murder case as a whole and the amount of testing (lack of) and the lack of care and respect for Jodi’s body after the murder, the importance of a fingerprint expert used for this purpose in the case is pretty far-fetched and not at all significant in proving Luke murdered Jodi in any way.
Justice should be about truth, not false representation. It Is fundamental for the rule of law that judges are not influenced by irrelevant circumstances.This 👆🏽is pathetic and so out of context!
Con- artist Sandra Lean didn’t attend Killer Luke Mitchell’s trial and didn’t hear the 42 days worth of evidence against sadistic and dangerous killer Luke Mitchell.
There is no mention of adoptee Corinne Mitchell’s mental health and/or personality disorder
Cherry picking one aspect of the evidence doesn’t paint the clear and full picture - possibly why some of these people cannot recognise they are being duped
“
This was put to the jury to demonstrate his mum CM was capable of lying and covering up for Luke along with Luke’s older brother SM”
What about the fact the ‘cool and confident’ killer was underage when he had the tattoo and that his mother Corinne Mitchell was treating her teenage son as an adult, like when he purchased an over 18 DVD two days after his murder
And like when his mother purchased him a replacement knife for Christmas
“
Corinne Mitchell, 45, admitted she had been surprised to learn son Luke carried knives and smoked cannabis”
Callous and cruel Corinne Mitchell wasn’t surprised her killer son carried knives - she knew - she bought them for him!
“
Later in the trial the charges against both SM and CM were dropped without the jury knowing this”It wasn’t until ‘later’ in the trial that liars Shane and Corinne Mitchell were called to give evidence
Corrine Mitchell wasn’t called until the following year - 15th of January 2005!
👇
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4171943.stmShane Mitchell “
said his memory had been affected after a problem with drugs a few years ago”
Did liar Corinne Mitchell tell Shane Mitchell to pretend his memory was affected because of ‘a problem with drugs a few years earlier’ or did liar Shane Mitchell concoct this up on his own?
