If gouger Sandra Lean had attended any of killer Luke Mitchell’s trial she would have known a lot more about the facts and evidence against killer Luke Mitchell and may not not have got so much wrong in her books
Excerpt from Sandra Lean’s 1st discredited book No Smoke
“According to Alan Turnbull QC, there were three things that proved that Luke was the killer:
The "identification" of him at the Easthouses end of the path with Jodi at around 5pm.
The "fact" that Shane said Luke was not at home between 5pm and 5.45pm.
The testimony of the other three members of the search party.
These three things were "central" to the prosecution‟s case, he claimed.
Alan Turnbull did NOT reduce down 42 days worth of evidence to ‘three things’
Grifter Sandra Lean is far worse than any tabloid journalist has been made out to be by all those people who are not familiar with this innocence fraud
“In his closing speech, Alan Turnbull QC narrowed the prosecution case down to three key pieces of evidence. He argued the evidence of the accused’s brother, Jodi Jones family members and a passer-by were sufficient grounds on which to convict Mitchell
https://www.heraldscotland.com/default_content/12463287.one-scotlands-biggest-cases-fails-answer-jodi-murdered/
And the above is an out of full context interpretation of a journalist - who did not publish everything Alan Turnbull said in his closing speech
The judge, lord Nimmo Smith, would have given the jury directions before they were sent out to consider their verdict
An example of a judges summing up
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/08/transcript-of-judges-summing-up-r-v-simon-john-hall/Note the judges directions to the jury
Where can lord Nimmo Smith’s full summing up to the jury be read?
