"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

The absence of food in the Mitchell house is central to the whole case whereas whether [Name removed] had eaten or not did not prevent her from being murdered.

I don’t agree the ‘absence of food in the Mitchell house is central to the whole case’ but all available evidence points to killer Luke Mitchell never having cooked a meal on the 30th June 2003

And the story changes regarding this lie - at the time - and over the years have been unbelievable

There’s been a chicken pie

a steak pie

And some years ago grifter Sandra Lean claimed Corinne Mitchell had prawns

Corinne then claimed she ate her prawns in the garden 🙄

It was also stated Corinne stopped off at a shop on her way home to buy cigarettes and booze

Has Sandra Lean ever published the shop receipt to show exactly what Corinne purchased from the shop that day ?

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell lied

“Mrs Mitchell said Luke ate his meal in the living room before setting off to meet Jodi at about 1740 GMT.

"They arranged to meet. He wasn't sure what time. All he knew was she was coming down," she said.

”Mrs Mitchell told the court she returned home about 5.15pm on the day of the murder to find Luke in the kitchen making tea, while Shane was upstairs.

As they ate, Luke told her Jodi had sent him a text message suggesting they meet that night

And Corinne Mitchell has since been further caught in the lie

She has since claimed she ate her alleged prawns in the garden

In reality - Corinne Mitchell does not appear to have known where her killer son was at this time

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell did not see her killer son Luke Mitchell when she returned home from work because he was behind the wall on Roans Dyke path committing his murder

“”She said her son had returned home at about 2100 GMT and told her Jodi had not turned up.

Mrs Mitchell said that had been a surprise to her, adding that Luke had been "miffed" at Jodi's non-appearance.

Asked whether her son had seemed anxious, she replied: "Not at that point, no."

And killer Luke Mitchell told the police he arrived home from the Abbey at 9:35pm NOT 9.00pm

If the killer had really told his mother Corinne Jodi Jones had not turned up why didn’t Luke or Corrine Mitchell telephone the Jones house to see if Jodi was home and was okay?

[Nicholas]

I don’t agree the ‘absence of food in the Mitchell house is central to the whole case’ but all available evidence points to killer Luke Mitchell never having cooked a meal on the 30th June 2003

And what the evidence also points to is Jodi Jones may well have only been going to meet killer Luke Mitchell for a short while

Jodi Jones went out without eating telling her mother to save her some lasagne

If Jodi had found out about Kimberly Thompson, or another girl, it’s highly likely she wanted to confront killer Luke regarding this

[Nicholas]

And what the evidence also points to is Jodi Jones may well have only been going to meet killer Luke Mitchell for a short while

Jodi Jones went out without eating telling her mother to save her some lasagne

If Jodi had found out about Kimberly Thompson, or another girl, it’s highly likely she wanted to confront killer Luke regarding this

Did Jodi Jones and killer Luke Mitchell have an argument on the way home from school that day?

What did killer Luke tell the police about how he got home from school and who saw him

Were there any witnesses who said they saw him on his way home from school?

Was killer Luke Mitchell already at the other end of Roans Dyke path ([Name removed]’s end) when his text messages were sent to Jodi Jones?

[Nicholas]

And what the evidence also points to is Jodi Jones may well have only been going to meet killer Luke Mitchell for a short while

Jodi Jones went out without eating telling her mother to save her some lasagne

If Jodi had found out about Kimberly Thompson, or another girl, it’s highly likely she wanted to confront killer Luke regarding this

Wasn’t this a suspicion the police had

It sounds like Jodi Jones was on to her cheating, lying boyfriend

[Nicholas]

Wasn’t this a suspicion the police had

It sounds like Jodi Jones was on to her cheating, lying boyfriend

Innocence fraudster Sandra Lean can seemingly quote what she wants from a 14 year old girls private diary  - but there would obviously have been no entry for the 30th June 2003

And so no knowing what Jodi Jones state of mind was regarding her boyfriend killer Luke Mitchell when she met with him that day

[Nicholas]

Innocence fraudster Sandra Lean can seemingly quote what she wants from a 14 year old girls private diary  - but there would obviously have been no entry for the 30th June 2003

And so no knowing what Jodi Jones state of mind was regarding her boyfriend killer Luke Mitchell when she met with him that day

Why did Donald Findlay choose to cross examine Geraldine Mackie with some of Jodi Jones private diary entries? 

[Nicholas]

Heather Lungley
I had missed it first time it was shown in Feb 2021 Sharon. Great to see that more people are coming over after listening to Naomi’s podcast! She has made a really fantastic job of it.

Sharon Indy Sunshine
Oh, absolutely Heather she is lovely too! It was number 5 in the worlds top downloads not sure where it is now x

Manipulative Liar, Narcissistic Abuser, Gaslighter, Deluded Fantasist & Innocence Fraud Pusher Naomi Channel ~ COMING SOON.. (Part 158)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/01/30/through-the-wall-on-the-case-against-luke-mitchell-podcast-by-manipulative-liar-narcissistic-abuser-deluded-fantasist-innocence-fraud-pusher-naomi-channel/

[Nicholas]

Angie Timothy
Heather Lungley im good at visulising things but my sister needs to look at things to work out whats were, ive had loads of people asking me why i was at holyrood aswell and when i told them i have had the same stuff said to me  once ive explained a good bit to them they are the same away down the rabbit hole and a lot have come back to me and said this isnt right i believe that laddie hasnt done this or that laddie is innocent, Its amazing the amount of new members we have had since all the truth is coming out about destroying of evidence etc, everyone has done brilliant getting the word out there.

Con artists like killer Luke Mitchell and Sandra Lean ‘appeal to the dreamer in you’

Sandra Lean (today)
WAKE UP.  You’re being lied to. They’re taking the proverbial out of you. Boiling you like a frog.

More projections from this ‘witch’ who has been duping anyone who will listen to her for years

By Sandra Lean & a sadistic, psychopathic & misogynistic killer

Con artists hack your brain ... with your permission
👇
https://www.fraud-magazine.com/article.aspx?id=4295009014

12 Tricks Con Artists Use to Win Your Trust
👇
https://www.rd.com/list/con-artists-win-trust/

Why Do People Believe Con Artists?

…con artists are especially skillful at what social scientists call framing, telling stories in ways that appeal to the biases, beliefs and prominent desires of their targets. They use strategies that take advantage of human weaknesses.

👇
https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/02/25/why-do-people-believe-con-artists/

[Nicholas]

Inka Oldmoot seemes to be one of the Chief Shamers.

Sandra Lean is taking advantage of people like Inka Oldmoot’s human weaknesses

[Nicholas]

Suzy Hall
Upon reading a blog I did find this regarding the V in the wall and wondered if someone could help me with the following paragraph:-

Suzy Hall
Ana Azaria thank you! I just wanted to blow this author's claim.

Sharon Indy Sunshine
You are very welcome Suzy and I agree! It’s why we try to avoid it

It’s a shame people like Sharon Indy Sunshine are choosing to remain blinkered regarding killer Luke Mitchell and Sandra Lean’s blatant innocence fraud

Suzy Hall commented on ‘guest blogs’ written by Parky, which were originally posted on this forum 

Have a read of con artist Sandra Lean’s chapter from her first discredited book No Smoke on killer Simon Hall
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/08/copy-of-chapter-from-sandra-leans-1st-discredited-smoke-mirrors-book-promoting-the-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-of-actually-factually-guilty-killer-luke-mitchell/

Then have a read of this - or vice versa
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/the-truth-behind-killer-simon-hall-and-his-enablers-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-scam-%ef%b8%8f/

[Nicholas]

Mrs Walker, 67, said: 'The only place I could think to go was the path because that was the last place Jodi was going.

'As we were walking down the path, Judith (Jodi's mum) either texted or phoned to say Luke was at the other end of the path and was going to meet up with us.'

They met Mitchell with his German shepherd and he asked Mrs Walker, who was with Jodi's sister Janine and her fiance, Steven Kelly, if they had anything of Jodi's so the dog could get a scent.

The High Court in Edinburgh was told that Mitchell said he hadn't seen anything walking up the path but Mrs Walker wanted to walk down to check for herself.

She shone her torch into undergrowth and shouted out Jodi's name and Mitchell was saying 'Seek Jodi' to the dog.

Mitchell was leading the group when he came to a V-shaped gap in the wall.

Mrs Walker said he went to the gap, handed the dog on the leash to her and climbed over.

She said: 'He had just gone over the wall, came back and said there's something there.

It’s not clear by the framing of the wording of the above whether or not killer Luke Mitchell climbed back over the wall to again be back on the path side or whether he was still on the other side of the wall - to which he had just climbed over

[Nicholas]

“She said: 'He had just gone over the wall, came back and said there's something there.

'Steven went over next ... I couldn't make out what he said ... I think he was being sick or something. He came back over the wall and was in a state.'

She, too, then clambered over the wall.

Mrs Walker said: 'I was shining my torch and I could see something.

'It was a light-coloured shape and I thought it was an animal or something.

'I couldn't see for a tree what it was and when I was past the tree I noticed it was Jodi. I stopped and Jodi was just lying there. She didn't have her glasses on.'

Alan Turnbull, QC, prosecuting, asked what her reaction would be if it was suggested that Mitchell had walked past the V-shape and that his dog started clawing at the wall at a spot where Jodi's body lay on the other side.

She replied: 'No, because we didn't walk past that.'

[Nicholas]

Cross-examined by Donald Findlay, QC, she agreed Mitchell had not protested about going back down the path.

Findlay asked: 'Do you agree had it not been for the fact that Luke went over the wall the four of you would have walked right past Jodi?'

Mrs Walker replied: 'Yes, I would have walked straight down because I would never have looked over the wall.

'The only reason Jodi was there was she went there with someone she knew, as no stranger would have got her across that wall.'

During her evidence, she tearfully decribed seeing her granddaughter's body.

She said: 'Jodi was just lying there and the bottom part of her was twisted.

'She was looking up at the sky and her eyes were open. I was standing there looking because I couldn't believe it. I noticed the mark on her neck.

'I did go closer up to Jodi and I actually touched her forehead.'

At that point, Jodi's mum, Judith, and her sister, Janine, hurriedly left the courtroom.


Sandra Lean is duping you all and choosing to re-victimise and re-traumatise Jodi Jones loved ones

It’s what she does!