Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 824470 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2340 on: March 28, 2023, 07:07:42 PM »
Straight from a narcissist play book.

and/or psychopath
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2341 on: March 28, 2023, 07:10:23 PM »
The following article was published in 2003 by the same paper who Ashlie McNally has recently published her innocence fraud article on dangerous killer Luke Mitchell

Ashlie McNally appears to have carried out zero due diligence

DETECTIVES hunting the killer of Jodi Jones have found DNA at the murder scene different from her boyfriend Luke Mitchell's.

The first genetic fingerprint is a trace of saliva found close to where Jodi was killed in Easthouses, near Dalkeith.

The second is another body fluid capable of providing a breakthrough.

In the early stages of the inquiry, detectives said Jodi may have disturbed her killer committing a sex act.

The two samples are not the only DNA clues found near the spot where 14-year-old Jodi's body was found, close to a path popular with joggers and people walking dogs.

But the clues may take the investigation in a new direction. Detectives have always played down speculation that more than one person was involved in Jodi's murder.

Tests have revealed that the two samples are not from the same person. They have also eliminated Luke, 15, as a possible source.

The Sunday Mail can reveal that the samples were the reason joggers were asked to provide DNA samples last week.

A police source said: ``The team has started initial tests to see if they can find a match for those samples, which were not thought to be particularly important in the initial stages of the inquiry.

``Other DNA samples found at the scene have been seen for a long time as potentially more important.

``But we have to be extremely thorough in looking at every single detail thrown up during the inquiry.''

A police spokesman said: ``We have carried out DNA tests for operational reasons. We are hoping these will help to eliminate possible lines of inquiry.''

Jodi was on her way to meet boyfriend Luke when she was murdered on June 30.

Luke gave a TV interview denying he was her killer on the day of her funeral.

Detectives are still hunting a stocky man seen carrying a rucksack and following Jodi on the day of her death.

Because the murder scene was on a well used path, scientists have warned detectives leading the investigation that DNA samples found may prove to be red herrings.

Meanwhile, the Scottish Executive have publicly declared their full backing for the team leading the inquiry.

Justice Minister Cathy Jamieson voiced her support despite criticisms made by the Mitchell family lawyer Nigel Beaumont.

Mr Beaumont complained that Luke had been handcuffed and his identity made known to the media. He said Luke would be lodging a formal complaint.

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2342 on: March 28, 2023, 07:13:44 PM »
Has LM's use of his knife in jabbing Jodi at a party been discussed (see article below)?

Piquerism is a sexual interest in penetrating the skin of another person with sharp objects (such as pins, razors, knives, etc.) Piquerism is a paraphilia as well as a form of sadism.


Byline: By Amy Devine

SADIST Luke Mitchell used a knife on Jodi weeks before he murdered and mutilated her. Jodi, 14, writhed in pain as her twisted boyfriend repeatedly jabbed the blade into her leg. She cried out at each blow but Mitchell seemed to be enjoying himself. Mitchell tormented Jodi with the knife at a party, in full view of their friends.

One witness said yesterday: 'It was very disturbing. Luke could see that it hurt and he seemed to be getting a kick out of it.' Mitchell and Jodi went to the party at a friend's house six weeks before the murder. He used the knife to cut up cannabis, then turned on his smitten young girlfriend. One friend who witnessed the abuse said: 'Luke and Jodi were sitting together and he was poking her in the leg with a knife. 'He was jabbing her with it quite hard and she was jumping up and down because of the pain. It seemed a really cruel thing to do.

'One girl was particularly disgusted. She shouted at Luke to put the knife away and told him she would stick it up his a*** if he didn't. He stopped.' The witness added: 'We never dreamed Jodi would be dead weeks later.

'Looking back, it makes my skin crawl to think it was a warning that no one heeded.But we were just kids.' After Jodi's murder, one of her friends told police what had happened at the party. The girl was put on the witness list for Mitchell's trial. But it's understood prosecutors decided not to call her because of concerns that the defence would attack her credibility. It was feared that because drugs were freely available at the party, the jury would be distracted from the real issue - Jodi's murder.

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/I+WATCHED+MITCHELL+TORMENT+JODI+WITH+HIS+BLADE.-a0127488534

Didn’t innocence fraudster and “lawyer” Sandra Lean claim it was John F erris who witnessed psycho killer Luke Mitchell stabbing Jodi Jones in the leg?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2343 on: March 28, 2023, 07:20:24 PM »
Has LM's use of his knife in jabbing Jodi at a party been discussed (see article below)?

Piquerism is a sexual interest in penetrating the skin of another person with sharp objects (such as pins, razors, knives, etc.) Piquerism is a paraphilia as well as a form of sadism.


Byline: By Amy Devine

SADIST Luke Mitchell used a knife on Jodi weeks before he murdered and mutilated her. Jodi, 14, writhed in pain as her twisted boyfriend repeatedly jabbed the blade into her leg. She cried out at each blow but Mitchell seemed to be enjoying himself. Mitchell tormented Jodi with the knife at a party, in full view of their friends.

One witness said yesterday: 'It was very disturbing. Luke could see that it hurt and he seemed to be getting a kick out of it.' Mitchell and Jodi went to the party at a friend's house six weeks before the murder. He used the knife to cut up cannabis, then turned on his smitten young girlfriend. One friend who witnessed the abuse said: 'Luke and Jodi were sitting together and he was poking her in the leg with a knife. 'He was jabbing her with it quite hard and she was jumping up and down because of the pain. It seemed a really cruel thing to do.

'One girl was particularly disgusted. She shouted at Luke to put the knife away and told him she would stick it up his a*** if he didn't. He stopped.' The witness added: 'We never dreamed Jodi would be dead weeks later.

'Looking back, it makes my skin crawl to think it was a warning that no one heeded.But we were just kids.'
After Jodi's murder, one of her friends told police what had happened at the party. The girl was put on the witness list for Mitchell's trial. But it's understood prosecutors decided not to call her because of concerns that the defence would attack her credibility. It was feared that because drugs were freely available at the party, the jury would be distracted from the real issue - Jodi's murder.

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/I+WATCHED+MITCHELL+TORMENT+JODI+WITH+HIS+BLADE.-a0127488534

Would be interested to hear what this women says now knowing the psycho killer also pulled a knife out on Kara Van Null around the same time

Sandra Lean only ever pretended she gave a damn about young girls and a killer being at large

The fact she fails to address the massive red flags around intimate partner femicide is appauling too
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2344 on: March 28, 2023, 07:26:13 PM »
Has LM's use of his knife in jabbing Jodi at a party been discussed (see article below)?

Piquerism is a sexual interest in penetrating the skin of another person with sharp objects (such as pins, razors, knives, etc.) Piquerism is a paraphilia as well as a form of sadism.


Byline: By Amy Devine

SADIST Luke Mitchell used a knife on Jodi weeks before he murdered and mutilated her. Jodi, 14, writhed in pain as her twisted boyfriend repeatedly jabbed the blade into her leg. She cried out at each blow but Mitchell seemed to be enjoying himself. Mitchell tormented Jodi with the knife at a party, in full view of their friends.

One witness said yesterday: 'It was very disturbing. Luke could see that it hurt and he seemed to be getting a kick out of it.' Mitchell and Jodi went to the party at a friend's house six weeks before the murder. He used the knife to cut up cannabis, then turned on his smitten young girlfriend. One friend who witnessed the abuse said: 'Luke and Jodi were sitting together and he was poking her in the leg with a knife. 'He was jabbing her with it quite hard and she was jumping up and down because of the pain. It seemed a really cruel thing to do.

'One girl was particularly disgusted. She shouted at Luke to put the knife away and told him she would stick it up his a*** if he didn't. He stopped.' The witness added: 'We never dreamed Jodi would be dead weeks later.

'Looking back, it makes my skin crawl to think it was a warning that no one heeded.But we were just kids.' After Jodi's murder, one of her friends told police what had happened at the party. The girl was put on the witness list for Mitchell's trial. But it's understood prosecutors decided not to call her because of concerns that the defence would attack her credibility. It was feared that because drugs were freely available at the party, the jury would be distracted from the real issue - Jodi's murder.

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/I+WATCHED+MITCHELL+TORMENT+JODI+WITH+HIS+BLADE.-a0127488534

From reading the account of the party it seems that several ‘friends’ saw Luke jabbing Jodi with a knife yet none of them were called as witnesses. Only two possible reasons why that would have happened either a) everyone was so off their faces that they would not have made reliable witnesses or b) it was a fabricated account for financial gain.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2345 on: March 28, 2023, 07:26:48 PM »
Btw psychopathic innocence fraud killer Adnan Syed has had his murder conviction reinstated

 8((()*/
« Last Edit: March 28, 2023, 07:49:29 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2346 on: March 28, 2023, 08:07:27 PM »
Krissy Porteous
The news about the 10 samples never being tested is absolutely shocking, I think it really goes to show the level of corruption that has been allowed to happen in this case, I mean if they really, truly believed it was LM that killed jodi then surely they would have tested those samples for instance to see if someone else was involved too, for all they knew he could have had an accomplice but they didn’t even try…. IMO because they knew! Well Shame on them! Shame on every officer that turned a blind eye to further their own career or to stop their failings being discovered, those that let a 14year old schoolboys life be destroyed and his future be sacrificed for their own selfish gains! 90% of evidence destroyed, 10% left…well I hope to god that 10% has the results needed to get that boy/man out and put the real killer behind bars! And that’s if good ‘ole DB allows the defence access to the samples to test them! That woman has far too much power for my liking.

Sandra Lean
Tracy Anderson Kerry Tremble Kevan Krissy Porteous - it's not entirely true that there is no-one higher than her. We - the people of Scotland - collectively, are higher than her. We can force her hand, if we're organised and persistent enough - if it comes to it, I'm confident we will be



The only ‘corruption’ at play is by ‘lawyers’ Sandra Lean and Scott Forbes to the minds of all those people not familiar with the various innocence fraud tactics
« Last Edit: March 28, 2023, 08:12:13 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2347 on: March 28, 2023, 08:09:08 PM »
‘Through The Wall’ on ‘The Case Against Luke Mitchell’ Podcast By Manipulative Liar, Narcissistic Abuser, Gaslighter, Deluded Fantasist & Innocence Fraud Pusher Naomi Channel ~ COMING SOON..
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/01/30/through-the-wall-on-the-case-against-luke-mitchell-podcast-by-manipulative-liar-narcissistic-abuser-deluded-fantasist-innocence-fraud-pusher-naomi-channel/
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2348 on: March 28, 2023, 08:11:53 PM »
Sandra Lean
Tracy Anderson Kerry Tremble Kevan Krissy Porteous - it's not entirely true that there is no-one higher than her. We - the people of Scotland - collectively, are higher than her. We can force her hand, if we're organised and persistent enough - if it comes to it, I'm confident we will be


You won’t Sandra Lean!
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2349 on: March 28, 2023, 08:15:18 PM »
Sandra Lean
Rachel Roll Oh, look - Rona MacKay again - she who sits on the Criminal Justice Parliamentary Group whilst simultaneously believing there's nothing wrong with our Criminal Justice System and bullying anyone who suggests there might be. Got to admire her blind faith, I suppose!!!!! She never did accept my invitation to talk.



Sandra Lean mocking her followers and their ‘blind faith’ in her
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2350 on: March 28, 2023, 08:17:15 PM »
The following article was published in 2003 by the same paper who Ashlie McNally has recently published her innocence fraud article on dangerous killer Luke Mitchell

Ashlie McNally appears to have carried out zero due diligence

DETECTIVES hunting the killer of Jodi Jones have found DNA at the murder scene different from her boyfriend Luke Mitchell's.

The first genetic fingerprint is a trace of saliva found close to where Jodi was killed in Easthouses, near Dalkeith.

The second is another body fluid capable of providing a breakthrough.

In the early stages of the inquiry, detectives said Jodi may have disturbed her killer committing a sex act.

The two samples are not the only DNA clues found near the spot where 14-year-old Jodi's body was found, close to a path popular with joggers and people walking dogs.

But the clues may take the investigation in a new direction. Detectives have always played down speculation that more than one person was involved in Jodi's murder.

Tests have revealed that the two samples are not from the same person. They have also eliminated Luke, 15, as a possible source.

The Sunday Mail can reveal that the samples were the reason joggers were asked to provide DNA samples last week.

A police source said: ``The team has started initial tests to see if they can find a match for those samples, which were not thought to be particularly important in the initial stages of the inquiry.

``Other DNA samples found at the scene have been seen for a long time as potentially more important.

``But we have to be extremely thorough in looking at every single detail thrown up during the inquiry.''

A police spokesman said: ``We have carried out DNA tests for operational reasons. We are hoping these will help to eliminate possible lines of inquiry.''

Jodi was on her way to meet boyfriend Luke when she was murdered on June 30.

Luke gave a TV interview denying he was her killer on the day of her funeral.

Detectives are still hunting a stocky man seen carrying a rucksack and following Jodi on the day of her death.

Because the murder scene was on a well used path, scientists have warned detectives leading the investigation that DNA samples found may prove to be red herrings.

Meanwhile, the Scottish Executive have publicly declared their full backing for the team leading the inquiry.

Justice Minister Cathy Jamieson voiced her support despite criticisms made by the Mitchell family lawyer Nigel Beaumont.

Mr Beaumont complained that Luke had been handcuffed and his identity made known to the media. He said Luke would be lodging a formal complaint.


Rachel Roll
So many things have came to light recently that are showing the police investigation up for what it really was...a shambles.
I saw a comment on one of the news reports today asking why would the police not test dna found on Jodi's body as if the person commenting was unwilling to believe it because it sounds so ridiculous, but it is true.
10 samples taken from Jodi's body containing bodily fluids that were never tested and hidden from the defence for almost 20 years!
The prosecutions case against Luke was entirely circumstantial no wonder they didn't want these samples uncovered. If it came back not a match to Luke as did all the others their case against him would fall apart.
Yes truly guilty people are often convicted on circumstantial evidence alone but to know that there were forensic avenues not explored and hidden away from the defense for almost 20 years is beyond shocking!
This combined with all the other things revealed recently was not a simple mistake or human error it's gross misconduct in a public office and its about time Police Scotland do the right thing and acknowledge this.
What use was their 'extensive forensic analysis' 
when we have a child convicted of murder without any forensic evidence to back up the conviction?


In reality the ‘shambles’ Rachel Roll refers to is ‘lawyer’ Sandra Leans (and dangerous killer Luke Mitchell and his toxic mother Corinne Mitchell’s) fraudulent PR campaign
« Last Edit: March 28, 2023, 08:19:31 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2351 on: March 28, 2023, 08:33:13 PM »
Would be interested to hear what this women says now knowing the psycho killer also pulled a knife out on Kara Van Null around the same time

Sandra Lean only ever pretended she gave a damn about young girls and a killer being at large

The fact she fails to address the massive red flags around intimate partner femicide is appauling too

Why did a 14 year old boy have such a knife in the first place? Did his brother have a knife collection? Surely a smaller penknife would have sufficed for his cannabis cutting.

Has CM ever explained why she bought a replacement knife to the missing murder weapon?


Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2352 on: March 28, 2023, 09:36:57 PM »
Why did a 14 year old boy have such a knife in the first place? Did his brother have a knife collection? Surely a smaller penknife would have sufficed for his cannabis cutting.

Was the missing brown handled Jack Pyke knife and leather pouch a 2002 Christmas present from Corinne Mitchell to her killer son Luke?

This 👇 suggests it was


However, yesterday a police spokesman declined to comment on reports that a 14-year-old youth had been questioned in connection with a missing knife. It is understood the boy had shown the knife off to friends after receiving it as a Christmas present, but it has since disappeared.
« Last Edit: March 28, 2023, 09:39:06 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2353 on: March 28, 2023, 09:40:22 PM »
Has CM ever explained why she bought a replacement knife to the missing murder weapon?

Corinne Mitchell’s evidence was that the black handled replacement knife was bought as a 2003 Christmas present

Corinne got her killer son Luke to fill out the catalogue order form apparently and she signed it

They also ordered a talon multi purpose tool - used for camping
« Last Edit: March 28, 2023, 09:43:17 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2354 on: March 28, 2023, 09:48:31 PM »
Why did a 14 year old boy have such a knife in the first place? Did his brother have a knife collection? Surely a smaller penknife would have sufficed for his cannabis cutting.

There was talk on the forums of Shane Mitchell having a knife collection at one point but it you look at the photos of psychopathic killer Luke Mitchell’s bedroom you’ll see some of the knifes/swords he’d collected.

Plus Jodi Jones commented to her friend about his knife collection

Several of killer Luke’s knifes also went missing after his murder

No idea where killer Luke/Corinne Mitchell had hidden the black handled replacement knife Corinne got him for Christmas 2003 but if magically reappeared after he was arrested

Corinne pretended she’s hidden in her kitchen and the police missies it but if you look at old video footage of their house in Newbattle Abbey crescent you’ll see that Corinne had a minimal sort of thing going on in her downstairs rooms

There’s no way the police would have missed a knife during their search - especially given the fact this is one of the items they would have been looking for
« Last Edit: March 28, 2023, 10:26:16 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation