"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Con artist Sandra Lean excerpt from IB (p.181)

‘The sad reality is that, in spite of more than 12 experienced officers attending the scene between midnight and 8am the following day, Jodi’s body lay, uncovered, in the rain, throughout that whole period.


No mention about the fact of the torrential downpour of rain at 7:30pm that evening

‘But a further claim by the prosecution raised some concerning points – partial DNA profiles on other parts of the t-shirt and on Jodi’s bra, “could have been” deposited there by rainwater transfer, since the clothing was left out in the rain overnight. (IB p.101)

Again no mention of the torrential downpour at around 7:30pm

 

👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/17/when-does-con-artist-sandra-lean-plan-to-attack-the-wealth-of-circumstantial-evidence-that-killer-luke-mitchells-convictions-rest-on-part-177/

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean did not attend killer Luke Mitchell’s trial because she did not want to be associated with Corinne Mitchell

[faithlilly]

Con artist Sandra Lean excerpt from IB (p.181)

‘The sad reality is that, in spite of more than 12 experienced officers attending the scene between midnight and 8am the following day, Jodi’s body lay, uncovered, in the rain, throughout that whole period.


No mention about the fact of the torrential downpour of rain at 7:30pm that evening

‘But a further claim by the prosecution raised some concerning points – partial DNA profiles on other parts of the t-shirt and on Jodi’s bra, “could have been” deposited there by rainwater transfer, since the clothing was left out in the rain overnight.

 

👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/17/when-does-con-artist-sandra-lean-plan-to-attack-the-wealth-of-circumstantial-evidence-that-killer-luke-mitchells-convictions-rest-on-part-177/

Wasn’t Corrine supposed to be burning the parka at 7.30? If it was burning at that time and there was a downpour the parka would have been sopping wet so how could it have been dry enough to burn again at 10pm when NF smelled the smoke?

[Nicholas]

Wasn’t Corrine supposed to be burning the parka at 7.30?

No

That’s Killer Luke Mitchell, Corinne Mitchell and Sandra Lean’s innocence fraud narrative

👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/14/__trashed-2/


The log burner was seen alight that evening in the Mitchell’s garden by several witnesses

On the 1st July killer Luke Mitchell told the police his mother Corinne and brother Shane Mitchell had had a fire in the back garden

Both of them denied this

Killer Luke Mitchell didn’t have an alibi between around 6:15pm - 7:30pm

TIMELINE Of Almost 15 Year Old Scottish Killer Luke Mitchell’s Murder (Part 174)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/09/30th-june-2003-timeline-of-14-year-old-killer-luke-mitchells-murder-part-174/

[Nicholas]

If it was burning at that time and there was a downpour the parka would have been sopping wet so how could it have been dry enough to burn again at 10pm when NF smelled the smoke?

Witnesses said the log burner was alight from around 6:30pm

TIMELINE Of Almost 15 Year Old Scottish Killer Luke Mitchell’s Murder (Part 174)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/09/30th-june-2003-timeline-of-14-year-old-killer-luke-mitchells-murder-part-

Con artist Sandra Lean has continued to hide what Corinne Mitchell said she was doing all evening

After eating her pretend prawns Corinne may have been in the lounge on one of her enormous sofa’s, sat with an alcoholic beverage

Whilst her killer son was burning his parka jacket, balaclava and gloves etc in the garden

‘A small number of fibre traces were found, but they could not be linked to any articles of clothing or any other item connected to the case. ~ Sandra Lean (IB p.218)

 

[Nicholas]

Wasn’t Corrine supposed to be burning the parka at 7.30? If it was burning at that time and there was a downpour the parka would have been sopping wet so how could it have been dry enough to burn again at 10pm when NF smelled the smoke?

Did you see the photograph of the log burner and the big lid on top of it

Facts Concerning The Log Burner (Part 70)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/10/09/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-70/

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean did not attend killer Luke Mitchell’s trial because she did not want to be associated with Corinne Mitchell

Sandra Lean was apparently saying she (Sandra) might get ‘petrol bombed’

She omits this from her innocence fraud book too

[Kenmair]

Did you see the photograph of the log burner and the big lid on top of it

Facts Concerning The Log Burner (Part 70)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/10/09/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-70/

Why would CM burn pampas grass if it was overcast and rained? Surely you wait until it was dry and after such a long day at work would not be interested in gardening.

Pampas grass was a notorious symbol for swingers. I'm sure such things didn't go on at "Bedlam 203" though, although one of the other neighbours made the odd visit to check them.

[faithlilly]

No

That’s Killer Luke Mitchell, Corinne Mitchell and Sandra Lean’s innocence fraud narrative

👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/14/__trashed-2/


The log burner was seen alight that evening in the Mitchell’s garden by several witnesses

On the 1st July killer Luke Mitchell told the police his mother Corinne and brother Shane Mitchell had had a fire in the back garden

Both of them denied this

Killer Luke Mitchell didn’t have an alibi between around 6:15pm - 7:30pm

TIMELINE Of Almost 15 Year Old Scottish Killer Luke Mitchell’s Murder (Part 174)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/09/30th-june-2003-timeline-of-14-year-old-killer-luke-mitchells-murder-part-174/

Absolute nonsense.

David Tulloch:

“ We went up to meet him at the college at about 7pm and we just mucked about.

And.

“School pal David High, 16, says that Mitchell called him at about 6.30pm on June 30 last year and invited him round.

David and two other friends set out to walk to Mitchell's home but he called them and told them to go to Newbattle Abbey College instead.

Advocate Depute Alan Turnbull QC asks the teenager: 'Where did you go then?' David replies: 'We just stayed there.”

Bit risky to ask your friend round to your house if you and your mother are destroying evidence in the garden, don’t you think?

[faithlilly]

Why would CM burn pampas grass if it was overcast and rained? Surely you wait until it was dry and after such a long day at work would not be interested in gardening.

Pampas grass was a notorious symbol for swingers. I'm sure such things didn't go on at "Bedlam 203" though, although one of the other neighbours made the odd visit to check them.

I believe Corrine claimed to be burning pampas grass on a different day.

As to swinging wasn’t that the accusation directed at Jodi’s parents? That Jodi caught them? Or is rumour and innuendo okay as long as it’s directed at the Mitchells?

[Nicholas]

Absolute nonsense.

David Tulloch:

“ We went up to meet him at the college at about 7pm and we just mucked about.

And.

“School pal David High, 16, says that Mitchell called him at about 6.30pm on June 30 last year and invited him round.

David and two other friends set out to walk to Mitchell's home but he called them and told them to go to Newbattle Abbey College instead.

Advocate Depute Alan Turnbull QC asks the teenager: 'Where did you go then?' David replies: 'We just stayed there.”

Bit risky to ask your friend round to your house if you and your mother are destroying evidence in the garden, don’t you think?

Killer Luke Mitchell didn’t call all three of them

He telephoned David High

Initially inviting David High to his house but needed more time to destroy evidence in his back garden so he phoned David back and told him he would meet him at Newbattle abbey college.

Wasmt killer Luke Mitchell’s hair wet when he got there?

And David Tulloch’s evidence was the four of them didn’t stay there - they went for a walk - at some point passing the Mitchell’s house in Newbattle Abbey crescent then ended up at the Tarzan swing

[faithlilly]

Killer Luke Mitchell didn’t call all three of them

He telephoned David High

Initially inviting David High to his house but needed more time to destroy evidence in his back garden so he phoned David back and told him he would meet him at Newbattle abbey college.

Wasmt killer Luke Mitchell’s hair wet when he got there?

And David Tulloch’s evidence was the four of them didn’t stay there - they went for a walk - at some point passing the Mitchell’s house in Newbattle Abbey crescent then ended up at the Tarzan swing

I didn’t say that Luke called anyone but David High.

If Corrine and Luke had been burning clothes they couldn’t have started much before 6.30 as the boys on the bikes saw Luke on their journey back from college at around 6.20 on the Newbattle Road. Therefore the burning of the incriminating evidence would just have started when he called High. Being devilishly clever, why would he have taken the risk?

Nope….Luke’s hair wasn’t wet….you must have dreamed it.

[Nicholas]

Nope….Luke’s hair wasn’t wet….you must have dreamed it.

Where exactly was killer Luke Mitchell when there was a torrential downpour of rain, because he didn’t have his hooded parka anymore - he’d burnt that in the back garden

[Nicholas]

Nonsense - LK heard noises that made him stop to listen, the noises stopped. Like rustling and movement. Asked to expand on this, he still heard rustling, it did not morph in to something else. He heard rustling/movement and a strangling sound, like someone in a headlock. Not the easiest thing to describe, but the clearest thing in this, it was enough for him to stop, there was something not right about the noise, it did not sit well with him - not just simple rustling. We hear of trauma people suffer from, does one imagine there was no trauma with this man?

There’s no mention of crucial witness Leonard Kelly in IB

** In Memory Of Leonard Kelly **(Part 179)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/19/in-memory-of-leonard-kelly-part-179/

[Nicholas]

LK was nervous of going forward, of being in the vicinity should he become suspect. This was the pressure he felt, not actual pressure from the police.

Leonard Kelly appears to have been one of the first witnesses to contact the police

And the ‘pressure he felt’ appears to have related to him blaming himself for not looking over the wall.

Now let us expand just a little more on this search party: The dog! The claims of going up that path. Firstly that prepped and ready and onto that path by 11pm. There is not doubt just how ready he was. Here again, no deliberation, nothing, straight into that role and off he goes. Those calls. Judith tells him she is phoning the police, she tells him in the call at 10.59pm that she has called the police. This is the call that was made to the emergency services around 10.50pm. Lean has an uncovered call 6 years later made around 10.45pm. It is the same call! Times marked wrong or otherwise. Only one call to the emergency services, from Judith Jones. In those statements, to Luke that she is going to make it, and to Luke that she had made it. To her mother also. Now Lean in the book has it, that Jodi could not have been known to be missing by 10.45pm, thus the call could not have been from her, even though she gave her name!? And there is only ever one call mentioned to them pre 11 and only one call logged, not two! But the author tries to grasp at that time of 10.45pm, and those claims of not knowing Jodi was missing - Absolute BS. Judith knew her daughter was missing, immediately those words were spoken from Mitchell, that he had "not seen her" And as soon as she had spoken with her mother, that hope her daughter may be there, she was not. All prior to 10.45pm, and of course the actual time was, at around 10.50pm.

TIMELINE Of Almost 15 Year Old Scottish Killer Luke Mitchell’s Murder (Part 174)

👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/09/30th-june-2003-timeline-of-14-year-old-killer-luke-mitchells-murder-part-174/