"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Justice for Luke Mitchell and Jodi Jones
@SharonIndy_[Name removed]LM
So, re. the Jones family requesting the transcripts, they could buy them like any other family who request transcripts.
They are there anyone can request them, I don't understand why I was told differently. I support Luke based on DNA, so release the samples. End the doubt NOW!
11:07 PM · Nov 9, 2023

Is Sharon Indy Sunshine a sadist?

In reality - a judge can order the trial transcripts be transcribed and published at the expense of the public purse on behalf of the murderers victims ie; the Jones family

[Nicholas]

TJ C
@TJC1419439
Why were we told we couldn't get the transcripts when we can, and why are there things in the transcripts we weren't told about? …http://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com
11:36 PM · Nov 7, 2023
https://twitter.com/TJC1419439/status/1722035236945457554

Scammer Sandra Lean was not and is not the “expert” she pretended to you all she was via James English in 2019

[Nicholas]

Justice for Luke Mitchell and Jodi Jones
@SharonIndy_[Name removed]LM
That is the big question!!  It was certainly a lie on Bob Ruffs podcast, she did not need to insert herself into the transcripts topic without the knowledge to back it up as It now looks very bad. Some will say lie about one thing....  Lie about......... I expected  better.
9:27 PM · Nov 8, 2023


There were numerous bare faced lies told on fraudster Bob Ruff’s podcast!

Including the fact that Jodi Jones did not walk Roans Dyke path alone that evening - she was with the almost 15 year old Luke Mitchell who Jodi believed was her boyfriend - ergo she did not believe she was at risk

[Nicholas]

Justice for Luke Mitchell and Jodi Jones
@SharonIndy_[Name removed]LM
That is the big question!!  It was certainly a lie on Bob Ruffs podcast, she did not need to insert herself into the transcripts topic without the knowledge to back it up as It now looks very bad. Some will say lie about one thing....  Lie about......... I expected  better.
9:27 PM · Nov 8, 2023

Neither did you Sharon!

[Nicholas]

TJ C
@TJC1419439
Why were we told we couldn't get the transcripts when we can, and why are there things in the transcripts we weren't told about? …http://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com
11:36 PM · Nov 7, 2023
https://twitter.com/TJC1419439/status/1722035236945457554

How do the “things” you “weren’t told about” fit into the actual facts of the case?

[Nicholas]

Alan Turnbull: Now later on that evening did you go out?

Shane Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: Do you remember where you went?

Shane Mitchell: Gary Coyle’s house

Alan Turnbull: And is he a friend?

Shane Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: Okay. If you look with me again please at the document which records the list of your telephone calls, you might be able to work out when you left. The production is 246. Sorry, could we see it on the screen please.
Now we looked, remember, yesterday at the call of 4 minutes past 6, that’s when you were on your way to Mr Beverage’s house?

Shane Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: The next call from your mobile is at 20 past 6, d’you see that?

Shane Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: And do you recognise that number that’s been called?

Shane Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: Whose is that?

Shane Mitchell: Thats’s Gary Coyle’s number

Alan Turnbull: Okay. Now just to cross reference this, look at production number 202. It’s probably easier if I show you the page. Now if we just put the calls from your landline on the phone. Thank you. This is a record of the telephone calls from your house telephone that evening 

Shane Mitchell: Uh-huh

Alan Turnbull: And you’ll see that there are no calls made from the house after 16:01 until 21:57, when there is a call to a Bathgate number?

Shane Mitchell: Uh-huh

Alan Turnbull: So that we can see that you appear to have called Gary Coyle from your mobile but not from the landline?

Shane Mitchell: Correct

Alan Turnbull: Does that give you an assistance as to remembering what time you left to go out and see Gary Coyle?

Shane Mitchell: I left to see Gary just after I phoned him

Alan Turnbull: Just after you phoned him?

Shane Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: So that would be just after 20 past 6

Shane Mitchell: Uh-huh

Alan Turnbull: Okay. And had you been home then accordingly between 5 to 5 and let’s say 20 past 6?

Shane Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: Alright. And after spending some time with Mr Coyle did you return home again that evening?

Shane Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: Do you know approximately what time?

Shaine Mitchell: As soon as I got in the house I (incomprehensible) phone, so round about     

Alan Turnbull appears to have made the jury aware of the fact Shane Mitchell had fabricated a story when he gave his 7th July 2003 police witness statement

Alan Turnbull also appears to have made the jury aware of the fact Shane Mitchell had continued to lie about the events surrounding the 30th June 2003

Shane Mitchell could not have been in two places at one time

Alan Turnbull: Now we looked, remember, yesterday at the call of 4 minutes past 6, that’s when you were on your way to Mr Beverage’s

Shane Mitchell could not have been on his way to Mr Beveridge’s at 6:04pm if Shane did not leave his house until “just after” 6:20pm

This appear to be what Alan Turnbull was demonstrating to the jury - that Shane Mitchell continued to lie

[Nicholas]

What from the above parts of the trial transcripts related to Shane Mitchell’s evidence is missing?

“LUKE Mitchell's brother recoiled in horror yesterday as he was shown gruesome pictures of Jodi Jones's naked and mutilated body.

Shane Mitchell, 23, was confronted with the shocking images in court.

He turned away after being shown the first photo and immediately asked for a break.

Shane sat in the witness box sipping a glass of water and wiping tears from his eyes before he had to look at another four photos.

He then admitted that, when he returned home on the day that Jodi died, he watched porn on his computer because he thought he was alone in the house.

Luke Mitchell, now 16, denies murdering Jodi, and maintains he was in the house when she died.

Shane told the High Court in Edinburgh that, on June 30, 2003, he arrived home at Newbattle Abbey Crescent, Dalkeith, Midlothian, at 4.50pm.

He said he went upstairs to his bedroom and watched porn on the internet.

Advocate depute Alan Turnbull, QC, told Shane he had no desire to humiliate or embarrass him but he wanted to know if he did anything else at that time.

When Shane said he wasn't, Mr Turnbull asked him to look at photos of Jodi's body where it was found near the town's wooded Roan's Dyke path.

As he glanced at the first photo, Mr Turnbull stated: 'I am not surprised to see your reaction. You looked a bit horrified and looked away, didn't you?

Shane replied: 'Yes.' Mr Turnbull added: 'These are not pleasant.The reason I asked you to look at these is so you can appreciate what we are dealing with. Do you understand now?

'Do you appreciate I can't let embarrassment stand in the way of getting to the bottom of this?'

Again, Shane replied: 'Yes.' The witness then admitted he had been engaged in a sex act while watching porn.

He agreed with the prosecutor that he wouldn't have done that if he thought anyone else had been home.

Mr Turnbull asked him: 'On that evening,about4.55pm,who did you think was in the house?'

Shane told him: 'No one at that time.' The advocate depute then asked: 'Did you see Luke when you went down after the internet session?'

The witness told the court:'I genuinely don't remember seeing my brother. He could have been there.'

Shane said his mum arrived home about 5.15pm and he joined her downstairs.

Mr Turnbull read out a police statement from Luke Mitchell in which he said he had tea with his mum before leaving the house at about 5.30pm to wait for Jodi.

His mother was present at the interview and, when police asked if he had eaten with Shane, his brother had asked her: 'Shane wasn't there, was he?'

His mum had intervened: 'No.' Luke had then added: 'Shane was not in when I left.'
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/JODI+PICS+HORROR+OF+MITCHELL%27S+BROTHER%3B+Tears+at+death+trial.-a0126987509

Were Shane Mitchell’s tears for himself because he had been caught out lying over and over again ?

[Nicholas]

What from the above parts of the trial transcripts related to Shane Mitchell’s evidence is missing?

“LUKE Mitchell's brother recoiled in horror yesterday as he was shown gruesome pictures of Jodi Jones's naked and mutilated body.

Shane Mitchell, 23, was confronted with the shocking images in court.

He turned away after being shown the first photo and immediately asked for a break.

Shane sat in the witness box sipping a glass of water and wiping tears from his eyes before he had to look at another four photos.

He then admitted that, when he returned home on the day that Jodi died, he watched porn on his computer because he thought he was alone in the house.

Luke Mitchell, now 16, denies murdering Jodi, and maintains he was in the house when she died.

Shane told the High Court in Edinburgh that, on June 30, 2003, he arrived home at Newbattle Abbey Crescent, Dalkeith, Midlothian, at 4.50pm.

He said he went upstairs to his bedroom and watched porn on the internet.

Advocate depute Alan Turnbull, QC, told Shane he had no desire to humiliate or embarrass him but he wanted to know if he did anything else at that time.

When Shane said he wasn't, Mr Turnbull asked him to look at photos of Jodi's body where it was found near the town's wooded Roan's Dyke path.

As he glanced at the first photo, Mr Turnbull stated: 'I am not surprised to see your reaction. You looked a bit horrified and looked away, didn't you?

Shane replied: 'Yes.' Mr Turnbull added: 'These are not pleasant.The reason I asked you to look at these is so you can appreciate what we are dealing with. Do you understand now?

'Do you appreciate I can't let embarrassment stand in the way of getting to the bottom of this?'

Again, Shane replied: 'Yes.' The witness then admitted he had been engaged in a sex act while watching porn.

He agreed with the prosecutor that he wouldn't have done that if he thought anyone else had been home.

Mr Turnbull asked him: 'On that evening,about4.55pm,who did you think was in the house?'

Shane told him: 'No one at that time.' The advocate depute then asked: 'Did you see Luke when you went down after the internet session?'

The witness told the court:'I genuinely don't remember seeing my brother. He could have been there.'

Shane said his mum arrived home about 5.15pm and he joined her downstairs.

Mr Turnbull read out a police statement from Luke Mitchell in which he said he had tea with his mum before leaving the house at about 5.30pm to wait for Jodi.

His mother was present at the interview and, when police asked if he had eaten with Shane, his brother had asked her: 'Shane wasn't there, was he?'

His mum had intervened: 'No.' Luke had then added: 'Shane was not in when I left.'
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/JODI+PICS+HORROR+OF+MITCHELL%27S+BROTHER%3B+Tears+at+death+trial.-a0126987509

Shane Mitchell could not have joined his mother downstairs at 5:16pm because he had not yet logged off after his internet session.

Did Shane Mitchell use the bathroom after his “internet session” and if so how long was he in the bathroom?

 

[Nicholas]

What from the above parts of the trial transcripts related to Shane Mitchell’s evidence is missing?

“LUKE Mitchell's brother recoiled in horror yesterday as he was shown gruesome pictures of Jodi Jones's naked and mutilated body.

Shane Mitchell, 23, was confronted with the shocking images in court.

He turned away after being shown the first photo and immediately asked for a break.

Shane sat in the witness box sipping a glass of water and wiping tears from his eyes before he had to look at another four photos.

He then admitted that, when he returned home on the day that Jodi died, he watched porn on his computer because he thought he was alone in the house.

Luke Mitchell, now 16, denies murdering Jodi, and maintains he was in the house when she died.

Shane told the High Court in Edinburgh that, on June 30, 2003, he arrived home at Newbattle Abbey Crescent, Dalkeith, Midlothian, at 4.50pm.

He said he went upstairs to his bedroom and watched porn on the internet.

Advocate depute Alan Turnbull, QC, told Shane he had no desire to humiliate or embarrass him but he wanted to know if he did anything else at that time.

When Shane said he wasn't, Mr Turnbull asked him to look at photos of Jodi's body where it was found near the town's wooded Roan's Dyke path.

As he glanced at the first photo, Mr Turnbull stated: 'I am not surprised to see your reaction. You looked a bit horrified and looked away, didn't you?

Shane replied: 'Yes.' Mr Turnbull added: 'These are not pleasant.The reason I asked you to look at these is so you can appreciate what we are dealing with. Do you understand now?

'Do you appreciate I can't let embarrassment stand in the way of getting to the bottom of this?'

Again, Shane replied: 'Yes.' The witness then admitted he had been engaged in a sex act while watching porn.

He agreed with the prosecutor that he wouldn't have done that if he thought anyone else had been home.

Mr Turnbull asked him: 'On that evening,about4.55pm,who did you think was in the house?'

Shane told him: 'No one at that time.' The advocate depute then asked: 'Did you see Luke when you went down after the internet session?'

The witness told the court:'I genuinely don't remember seeing my brother. He could have been there.'

Shane said his mum arrived home about 5.15pm and he joined her downstairs.

Mr Turnbull read out a police statement from Luke Mitchell in which he said he had tea with his mum before leaving the house at about 5.30pm to wait for Jodi.

His mother was present at the interview and, when police asked if he had eaten with Shane, his brother had asked her: 'Shane wasn't there, was he?'

His mum had intervened: 'No.' Luke had then added: 'Shane was not in when I left.'
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/JODI+PICS+HORROR+OF+MITCHELL%27S+BROTHER%3B+Tears+at+death+trial.-a0126987509

Shane Mitchell did not leave the house until “just after” 6:20pm - so this was yet another bare faced lie of killer Luke Mitchell’s - which Corinne Mitchell appears to have let fly

 

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean states here: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg452488.html#msg452488
”I'm sorry, I seem to have caused a bit of a misunderstanding. Of the incoming voicemail call on Luke's phone that night, I said“I didn't mean the actual call was still on Luke's phone - I should have made that clearer. The record of the call going to voicemail is in the phone logs, Corinne said in her statement that she was trying to call Luke to find out what was going on, but got his voicemail - the timings given in her statement and both her and Luke's phone records all matched up. My point was that the police deliberately lied about Luke "checking his voicemail" when the log is clearly labelled "incoming."

All of the police assertions regarding the phone calls, texts, etc, were put to Luke in the Section 14 interrogation 6 weeks after the murder. By then, the police had the phone logs - they also recovered a text from Corinne to Luke saying, "Right, you tell me right now what's going on - I'm coming up to get you" (not recovered from Luke's phone).

Corrine Mitchell
“You will tell me right now what is wrong. I'm on my way up to find you”


Sandra Lean
“Right, you tell me right now what's going on - I'm coming up to get you”

At 12:31pm killer Luke Mitchell telephoned his mother Corinne Mitchell and told her “Stop f..king phoning” (Source Scott C Forbes)

Ergo the killers mobile phone could not have been with any police officer until after this (00:30hrs) time

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/I+DIDN%27T+HELP+TO+COVER+UP+JODI+MURDER%3B+Denial+by+mother.-a0127122253

[Nicholas]

Alan Turnbull appears to have made the jury aware of the fact Shane Mitchell had fabricated a story when he gave his 7th July 2003 police witness statement

Alan Turnbull also appears to have made the jury aware of the fact Shane Mitchell had continued to lie about the events surrounding the 30th June 2003

Shane Mitchell could not have been in two places at one time

Alan Turnbull: Now we looked, remember, yesterday at the call of 4 minutes past 6, that’s when you were on your way to Mr Beverage’s

Shane Mitchell could not have been on his way to Mr Beveridge’s at 6:04pm if Shane did not leave his house until “just after” 6:20pm

This appear to be what Alan Turnbull was demonstrating to the jury - that Shane Mitchell continued to lie

After Shane Mitchell gave evidence, his mother Corinne Mitchell gave her evidence

During which she stated to Alan Turnbull about her killer son Luke Mitchell

“He physically couldn’t have been in two places at once”

The jury had previously heard Alan Turnbull demonstrate during Shane Mitchell’s testimony that Shane could not “have been in two places at once”

How did the jury perceive Corinne Mitchell’s evidence after having heard all previous witnesses evidence, including Shane Mitchell’s?

[Nicholas]

Scammer Sandra Lean from her first discredited book “No Smoke”

“The "fact" that Shane said Luke was not at home between 5pm and 5.45pm” http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/08/copy-of-chapter-from-sandra-leans-1st-discredited-smoke-mirrors-book-promoting-the-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-of-actually-factually-guilty-killer-luke-mitchell/

Fraudster Scott Forbes made the claim killer Luke Mitchell had texted his mother Corinne Mitchell at 5:45pm - which can be heard on the latest video by What They Found here
👇
https://youtu.be/0I0ETERCdmI?feature=shared

Was 5:45pm when killer Luke Mitchell changed his clothes and footwear?

What were Shane Mitchell and Corinne Mitchell doing at 5:45pm?

Did Shane Mitchell see killer Luke Mitchell when he (Shane) left to go to Gary Coyle’s house “just after” 6:20pm?

Where did killer Luke claim he was at 6:20pm?

What made killer Luke Mitchell change his mind about inviting David High back to his home in Newbattle Abbey Crescent?

[Nicholas]

Justice for Luke Mitchell and Jodi Jones
@SharonIndy_[Name removed]LM
So, re. the Jones family requesting the transcripts, they could buy them like any other family who request transcripts.
They are there anyone can request them, I don't understand why I was told differently. I support Luke based on DNA, so release the samples. End the doubt NOW!
11:07 PM · Nov 9, 2023

Sharon was visiting killer Luke Mitchell and very similar to fraudster Sandra Lean - he turned on her then dumped her

Since Sharon was dumped - Nicola and Gemma are now Sandra Lean and the murderers main “marks”

Firmly suspect MAPPA agencies are aware of the murderers shenanigans and this could very well be what was meant when it was referred to his previous offender behaviour

[Nicholas]

Suzy Hall on Twitter is pretending she wants “Justice for Jodi”

In response Sharon Indy Sunshine can’t even say Jodi Jones name

 

Justice for Luke Mitchell and Jodi Jones
@SharonIndy_[Name removed]LM
She does, so does Luke.  19 years locked up and no sign of that changing!  Why?
1:48 AM · Nov 9, 2023

 

Justice for Luke Mitchell and Jodi Jones
@SharonIndy_[Name removed]LM
Did the Jury know Luke Mitchell's Mother and Brother's charges were dropped during the trial?
Yes
No
27 votes
5 days left
1:54 AM · Nov 9, 2023

 

[Nicholas]

It was blatantly obvious charlatan Sandra Lean had targeted Sharon before the James English nonsense in 2019

Sandra Lean even appeared to pretend like she was nervous

What happened prior to Lean’s October 2022 “update” and why did she choose to use a clip which included Sharon’s first video with her?