At 7:58 Sandra Lean’s ‘subliminal actions’ - or not quite so ‘subliminal actions’ - are so see through
She claimed ‘in my case.. never realised the significance of..’… ‘little tiny details that can change the entire narrative’ blah blah BS BS
Sandra Lean
Why did Alice decide the search trio should go directly to the path (as her own and Janine's statements say she did)? They were supposed to believe Jodi was hanging out in Easthouses/Mayfield. "We just did,” as Alice answered in court, isn't really an answer.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0KJ JHZRaA9jRSx5V9tx3bSwp1kkp55mdqfWzNPoQb6J9R46TrGjq9vYdmUKnc6Y4sl&id=1011563515
Bare faced liar Sandra Lean and her ‘little tiny details’
Sandra claimed in that YouTube video (at approx 8.35 here https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iCsiViNiPGA) it was Janine Jones who said “we weren’t going all the way to Newbattle we were only going to the path” and “thank you Janine for the truth” and “the trial should have stopped right there”
In her Facebook post above from the 2nd May 2021 she attributes ‘we just did’ to Alice Walker
As usual she gives no context to any of it claiming “the trial should have stopped right there”
Why should the trial have stopped right there Sandra ?
Have you ever put this to a qualified lawyer?
Total ramblef**kery
Context is the key as usual Nicholas - They were going to search a path with, and led there by LM, that was the thought process at that point, rapidly led into a sequence of events by him. The question a feeble attempt by DF to combat what had been put forth around LM, that he had a five minute walk to the path from where he claimed to idle around, that he had no thought process of searching anywhere but that path, that when upon that path his thought process instantly went to that wall/the woods. He was the ONLY one with the knowledge (fallacy) of a girl walking that five minute walk to where he claimed to be waiting. Completely blind to this at that point.
Shown, that had they actually gotten to the end of that path after searching it, then their thought process of any next move would have had the opportunity of being applied, they didn't get an opportunity to have further thought process. The feeble application by DF of 'So if it hadn't been for Luke then Jodi would still have been in the woods -----' because he was the 'ONLY ONE to think of looking there----' That dog played virtually no part in his defence, a pointless exercise because he had of course lied, there had been no dog alerting to anything in that woods, LM was not where he attempted to place himself ---- Again, 'if it hadn't been for Luke (not the dog), going to the path and nowhere else, then going to the woods, Jodi would not have been found ---------- Again, shown clearly in it's full context that the defence were trying to credit LM's good thinking with this. Scraping to combat that special knowledge!
But and again, the trouble with taken something and completely applying the wrong context to it. Path, only the path, then wall, the brief look into the woods, then the next break and up and over. No more than 6mins to no more than 10-20secs.
That they most certainly did not just think of any path before going there, calls had been made to people to carry out the checks advised, the bog standard checks of making sure. There was no 'up here' - AW, JaJ's and SK did not know that Jodi had told her mother they would be "mucking around up here" Again context! All they knew was that LM had told Jodi's mother he had not seen her, that she failed to turn up, that he was going to the path, working through the motions of, and again, what can only be applied as a rapid series of events, fully led by LM.
Less than 1hr from start to finish, less than 52mins until he was shouting out from those woods - There is no applying what was known afterwards beforehand - The utter nonsense of all their focus should have been "up here" What planet do these people actually live on, constantly swallowing up nonsense without even trying to actually analyse. Only supposed to have been with that boy, him stating she had not turned up down there, instantly feeding the path to search. As has been highlighted, Jodi's mother frantic, her own mother trying to calm her down, contacting the police because she clearly thought something was seriously wrong, that it was not of character for the young girl to not have been with her boyfriend all evening ----- Which is the evidence led, and you can bet there is hell of lot more to this, the rest of the actual context instead of cherry picking parts and adding a false narrative to it, applying all that is not reality.
