Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 877607 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3360 on: May 13, 2023, 07:06:25 PM »
I'm perfectly fine, no need to worry. It was embarrassing to see adults and children chanting for justice for a child killer. Seemed to be more about LM than Jodi.

It's a poor show when the only Mitchell supporting LM is his murdering namesake of the KKK.  Anyway, onto the next useless petition or podcast diversion blaming other people.

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3361 on: May 13, 2023, 07:09:24 PM »
According to the FB events page the combined total of “going” and “interested” was about 80 people.  Did numbers far exceed this total?

I would say about 80 max. I was expecting roads closed and at least 10% of the 27,000 who signed the petition.

Offline Parky41

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3362 on: May 13, 2023, 08:10:13 PM »
I would say about 80 max. I was expecting roads closed and at least 10% of the 27,000 who signed the petition.

Always refreshing to have the humour included where appropriate. Certainly representative of "The people of Scotland will not be silenced" - Without a doubt.

The figure a little generous, some general public in there whilst the filming was doing it rounds, no doubt the media will report it as much more. maybe?

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3363 on: May 13, 2023, 08:26:25 PM »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3364 on: May 13, 2023, 08:38:32 PM »
I would say about 80 max. I was expecting roads closed and at least 10% of the 27,000 who signed the petition.
Not a cause that has got a large proportion of Scotland up in arms  then.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2023, 08:51:01 PM by Venturi Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Rusty

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3365 on: May 13, 2023, 08:41:08 PM »

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3366 on: May 13, 2023, 11:19:17 PM »
Not a single word said about Jodi. Very telling.

Much like your posts. Dr Lean seems to figure more than Jodi.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3367 on: May 13, 2023, 11:20:49 PM »
Always refreshing to have the humour included where appropriate. Certainly representative of "The people of Scotland will not be silenced" - Without a doubt.

The figure a little generous, some general public in there whilst the filming was doing it rounds, no doubt the media will report it as much more. maybe?

Much the same numbers that protested towards the end of the Glasgow Two’s campaign for justice.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Rusty

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3368 on: May 14, 2023, 06:32:06 PM »
Much like your posts. Dr Lean seems to figure more than Jodi.

Thanks for proving my point  8((()*/

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3369 on: May 14, 2023, 07:05:49 PM »
https://youtu.be/gl6NhrdeuWQ

Why use a picture of him as a teenage boy? It's a strange fetish when he is mid 30s. Why not show what 18 years of incarceration looks like for killing someone instead of some gormless wee laddie pic - even though this was after he'd murdered his girlfriend.


Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3370 on: May 14, 2023, 07:08:00 PM »
Thanks for proving my point  8((()*/

That your grudge is against Dr Lean and nothing really to do with justice for Jodi? You’re welcome.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Rusty

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3371 on: May 14, 2023, 07:58:43 PM »
justice for Jodi?

Already done. Luke Mitchell, convicted of her murder on 11 January 2005. Guilty by majority.

Offline Rusty

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3372 on: May 14, 2023, 08:10:03 PM »
Why use a picture of him as a teenage boy? It's a strange fetish when he is mid 30s. Why not show what 18 years of incarceration looks like for killing someone instead of some gormless wee laddie pic - even though this was after he'd murdered his girlfriend.

It is creepy.

But i suppose it is better than getting an updated selfie from his cell, it would be worse if Campbell photobombed him too. Certainly would not be able to pull on the heart strings, of the lonely middle-aged mothers that he seems to attract.

Offline Chris_Halkides

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3373 on: May 14, 2023, 08:10:25 PM »
Plus they were represented by a credible lawyer who managed to expose police failings which has yet to be proven in this case.
The way in which Luke Mitchell was questioned was "outrageous," and that is hardly the only failing.

Offline Rusty

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3374 on: May 14, 2023, 08:17:59 PM »
The way in which Luke Mitchell was questioned was "outrageous," and that is hardly the only failing.

I will fix this for you.

Unless the full transcript of the interview becomes available, then you cannot say with absolute certainly, what was "outrageous"