Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 878143 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris_Halkides

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3510 on: July 08, 2023, 10:41:36 PM »
With respect to this case, I do not believe that the entire report has ever been made public.  My comment upthread was more general.  In 2010 a new provision was added to the those governing the SCCRC.  "In determining whether or not it is in the interests of justice that a reference should be made, the Commission must have regard to the need for finality and certainty in the determination of criminal proceedings."

This provision is an invitation to ignore all but the most egregious wrongful convictions.  The need for finality can become a pretext for a system that wishes to cover up its errors.

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3511 on: July 08, 2023, 10:54:45 PM »
With respect to this case, I do not believe that the entire report has ever been made public.  My comment upthread was more general.  In 2010 a new provision was added to the those governing the SCCRC.  "In determining whether or not it is in the interests of justice that a reference should be made, the Commission must have regard to the need for finality and certainty in the determination of criminal proceedings."

This provision is an invitation to ignore all but the most egregious wrongful convictions.  The need for finality can become a pretext for a system that wishes to cover up its errors.

 @)(++(*

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3512 on: July 08, 2023, 11:14:39 PM »
@)(++(*

If you want finality, ask Lean to publish the SCCRC reasons or LM's 22 page statement. Lean and Forbes are done now, primarily because they couldn't keep their mouths shut and making it all about them.

Offline Chris_Halkides

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3513 on: July 08, 2023, 11:27:56 PM »
If you want finality, ask Lean to publish the SCCRC reasons or LM's 22 page statement. Lean and Forbes are done now, primarily because they couldn't keep their mouths shut and making it all about them.
https://www.barandbench.com/columns/the-origins-of-justice-must-be-seen-to-be-done
Why doesn't the SCCRC publish their report?  “'Justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done'. This dictum was laid down by Lord Hewart, the then Lord Chief Justice of England in the case of Rex v. Sussex Justices, [1924] 1 KB 256."  The particulars in that case are different from the particulars of this case, but the principle has broad applicability.

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3514 on: July 09, 2023, 12:14:02 AM »
https://www.barandbench.com/columns/the-origins-of-justice-must-be-seen-to-be-done
Why doesn't the SCCRC publish their report?  “'Justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done'. This dictum was laid down by Lord Hewart, the then Lord Chief Justice of England in the case of Rex v. Sussex Justices, [1924] 1 KB 256."  The particulars in that case are different from the particulars of this case, but the principle has broad applicability.

 @)(++(*
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3515 on: July 09, 2023, 12:18:25 AM »
If you want finality, ask Lean to publish the SCCRC reasons

Along with psycho killer Luke Mitchell’s evidence - which scammer Sandra Lean has hidden from her cult “followers”

20th December 2004: Detective constable Alan Towers Read Killer Luke Mitchell’s 22 Page Written Witness Statement From 1st July 2003 To The Jury

21st December 2004: Jury Heard Killer Luke Mitchell’s Recorded Police Interview From 4th July 2003

24th December 2004: Jury Heard Killer Luke Mitchell’s Recorded Police Interview From 14th August 2003
« Last Edit: July 09, 2023, 12:22:14 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3516 on: July 09, 2023, 01:19:28 PM »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3517 on: July 11, 2023, 08:15:41 AM »
Excerpts from Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke

”During the trial, the majority of the reporting was biased and prejudicial – much of the prosecution evidence was reported in detail, whilst the defence information was kept to an absolute minimum.

This is untrue.

There were numerous witnesses who gave evidence who don’t appear in any media articles

”After the verdict, stories were run about other girls who had apparently been threatened and frightened by Luke in the past, yet these were not presented in court.

This is also untrue.

If Sandra Lean had attended the trial, she would have known that the evidence of many of the witnesses was not reported on 
« Last Edit: July 11, 2023, 08:19:26 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3518 on: July 11, 2023, 08:29:37 AM »
Excerpts from Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke

”During the trial, the majority of the reporting was biased and prejudicial – much of the prosecution evidence was reported in detail, whilst the defence information was kept to an absolute minimum.

This is untrue.[/color]

The prosecution evidence also included sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s evidence

Very little of the killers evidence was ever reported on

Killer Luke Mitchell & His Abusive Innocence Fraud Enablers Have Hidden The Murderers Evidence From Their Cult Followers, Including His 22 Page Written Police Statement Dated 1st July 2003 & His 4th July & 14th August 2003 Recorded Police Interviews (Part 65)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/17/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-65/
« Last Edit: July 11, 2023, 08:33:44 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3519 on: July 11, 2023, 08:46:16 AM »
Excerpts from Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke

”During the trial, the majority of the reporting was biased and prejudicial – much of the prosecution evidence was reported in detail, whilst the defence information was kept to an absolute minimum.

This is untrue.

In reality

it was the prosecutions “information” which “was kept to an absolute minimum”
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3520 on: July 11, 2023, 08:49:09 AM »

20th December 2004: Detective constable Alan Towers Read Killer Luke Mitchell’s 22 Page Written Witness Statement From 1st July 2003 To The Jury

21st December 2004: Jury Heard Killer Luke Mitchell’s Recorded Police Interview From 4th July 2003

24th December 2004: Jury Heard Killer Luke Mitchell’s Recorded Police Interview From 14th August 2003

There was not even the equivalent of one page from sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s 22 page written witness statement published by the media

👇
Killer Luke Mitchell & His Abusive Innocence Fraud Enablers Have Hidden The Murderers Evidence From Their Cult Followers, Including His 22 Page Written Police Statement Dated 1st July 2003 & His 4th July & 14th August 2003 Recorded Police Interviews (Part 65)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/17/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-65/
« Last Edit: July 11, 2023, 08:52:07 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3521 on: July 11, 2023, 09:05:17 AM »
Scammers Corinne Mitchell, Sandra Lean and Scott Forbes have claimed that when Corinne Mitchell arrived at Dalkeith police station her killer son Luke Mitchell had been “stripped” and was sat in a paper suit

Yet it is stated that killer Luke Mitchell wasn’t asked about his clothing until after he had written his 22 page written statement

After giving his statement killer Luke Mitchell gave his permission for his clothes to be taken, for him to be checked over and for a blood sample to be taken

From para 159 here https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff85c60d03e7f57ebec57

At the conclusion of the interview with the accused, which was not under caution and in respect of which evidence had been led without objection, he agreed to the taking of his clothes by the police and the examination of his person and the taking of a blood sample by a police surgeon.


Dr Kranti Hiremath examined killer Luke Mitchell and took fingernail scrapings from him
« Last Edit: July 11, 2023, 09:46:20 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3522 on: July 11, 2023, 06:15:17 PM »
Excerpts from Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke

”During the trial, the majority of the reporting was biased and prejudicial – much of the prosecution evidence was reported in detail, whilst the defence information was kept to an absolute minimum. [/i]

The defence arguments dominate in the media

NOT the prosecutions arguments!
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3523 on: July 12, 2023, 12:48:48 PM »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation