Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 877833 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline James_Easton

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5055 on: December 05, 2023, 10:30:16 PM »
SHANE MITCHELL'S TESTIMONIES - CRITICAL EVIDENCE

Whilst seemingly, inevitably, resulting in damning condemnation from those on both sides of beliefs - 'water off a duck's arse, to me' - this might be significant and worthwhile pursuing.

Unless... opening Pandora's box and perhaps, would rather not...

Alas, sadly, I am unable to read any responses on this forum... however, if actually evidence related, please do so on the Facebook group.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/594743596079701/permalink/602112628676131/

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5056 on: December 05, 2023, 10:36:02 PM »

Whilst seemingly, inevitably, resulting in damning condemnation from those on both sides of beliefs - 'water off a duck's arse, to me' - this might be significant and worthwhile pursuing.

What is it with you and “sides” James Easton?

There’s a page missing from Shane Mitchell’s trial testimony - why?

Where’s page 2198 of Shane Mitchell’s testimony?

https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/shane-mitchell-full-transcript-13012005.html
« Last Edit: December 05, 2023, 10:52:29 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5057 on: December 05, 2023, 10:39:56 PM »

Alas, sadly, I am unable to read any responses on this forum...

 *&^^&

Yet more of your deception James Easton
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5058 on: December 05, 2023, 10:41:54 PM »
SHANE MITCHELL'S TESTIMONIES - CRITICAL EVIDENCE

Where’s sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s 22 page written witness statement which he made on 1st July 2003?

Do you not consider this “critical”?


Killer Luke Mitchell & His Abusive Innocence Fraud Enablers Have Hidden The Murderers Defence Evidence From Their Cult Followers, Including His 22 Page Written Police Statement Dated 1st July 2003 & The Content Of His 4th July & 14th August 2003 & 14th April 2004 Recorded Police Interviews (Part 65)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/17/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-65/
« Last Edit: December 05, 2023, 10:47:56 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5059 on: December 06, 2023, 12:40:28 AM »
Alas, sadly, I am unable to read any responses on this forum... however, if actually evidence related, please do so on the Facebook group.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/594743596079701/permalink/602112628676131/

Corinne Mitchell - May 2010
John
Luke was in the house between 5 and 5.30 ....eating his dinner. And here lies the problem they say we are lying.
should add to that.....I was also in the house eating my dinner as was Shane, albeit differnt rooms. Shane was in his bedroom , upstairs, I was outside and Luke was in the livingroom.

Corinne Mitchell and her ‘double binds’
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 12:43:13 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Mr Apples

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5060 on: December 06, 2023, 05:20:12 AM »
Why would the police have “seemed to believe” sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell had disposed of a German army shirt?

By the 14.08.03, as per LM's interview at DPS, the police had gathered intelligence and had taken witness statements regarding LM owning both a hip-length dull olive green German army parka jacket and a long olive green German army shirt. AH, the pushbike boy who didn't know LM (the other 2 boys, DH and GE, did know LM personally), was adamant and unambiguous that LM was wearing a long olive green german army shirt before 1800 on NB rd (it would be useful to read all of the boys' testimonies, as I would like clarification on the times they claim they saw LM at, what clothes they said he was wearing, and wether they waved over & acknowledged him and vice verca, etc, etc; perhaps LM was pretending to be on the phone so he didn't have to speak with them, keen to get on with his false alibi & disposal). I suggest he probably did destroy a shirt along with a jacket, not taking any chances as he must've been wearing the shirt underneath the parka when he murdered Jodi given he was spotted wearing it @ 1745/1750ish. This being the case, I presume he had planked/hidden the parka somewhere, between the F&W sighting and the 3 pushbike boys' sighting? He must've went home after the pushbike boys had seen him and changed into the shiny green bomber jacket with a black t-shirt underneath, then straight back onto the NB rd for 1800 or just before it (maybe SM was facilitating him during this window, maybe even using his car or corinne's car??). Such a mess!

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5061 on: December 06, 2023, 08:59:03 AM »
By the 14.08.03, as per LM's interview at DPS, the police had gathered intelligence and had taken witness statements regarding LM owning both a hip-length dull olive green German army parka jacket and a long olive green German army shirt. AH, the pushbike boy who didn't know LM (the other 2 boys, DH and GE, did know LM personally), was adamant and unambiguous that LM was wearing a long olive green german army shirt before 1800 on NB rd (it would be useful to read all of the boys' testimonies, as I would like clarification on the times they claim they saw LM at, what clothes they said he was wearing, and wether they waved over & acknowledged him and vice verca, etc, etc; perhaps LM was pretending to be on the phone so he didn't have to speak with them, keen to get on with his false alibi & disposal). I suggest he probably did destroy a shirt along with a jacket, not taking any chances as he must've been wearing the shirt underneath the parka when he murdered Jodi given he was spotted wearing it @ 1745/1750ish. This being the case, I presume he had planked/hidden the parka somewhere, between the F&W sighting and the 3 pushbike boys' sighting? He must've went home after the pushbike boys had seen him and changed into the shiny green bomber jacket with a black t-shirt underneath, then straight back onto the NB rd for 1800 or just before it (maybe SM was facilitating him during this window, maybe even using his car or corinne's car??). Such a mess!

Yes it’s looking that way

He was standing guard

Until he could get back home

Shane Mitchell said his killer brother Luke would be in the garden

I’d like to see what was said on page 2198 of Shane Mitchell’s trial testimony - he seemed indifferent to Jodi Jones
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 09:58:24 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5062 on: December 06, 2023, 10:33:03 AM »
Donna Easton has done another video

What’s interesting about Donna Easton’s latest two videos is the fact she used Andrew Holburn’s initials in her first video, yet in her second video Donna used the full names of Jodi Jones loved ones, as opposed to just their initials

Suggesting Donna perhaps sees Jodi Jones loved ones as fair game and their privacy isn’t as important as Andrew Holburn’s?

And scammer Sandra Lean is now being referred to by Donna as the title from her second innocence fraud book - “innocents betrayed”

It’s as though it’s the books fault for the bare faced lies, misinformation and disinformation told within its pages as opposed to the books author

And it wasn’t “Jodi’s murder” Donna!  - It was sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s murder!
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 10:59:18 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5063 on: December 06, 2023, 11:12:32 AM »
Donna Easton has done another video

Donna Easton there would have been umpteen “main planks”

In your latest video you stated;

”Main planks

* number 1 Finding of the body

* number 2 Witness sighting

* number 3 Luke’s brothers testimony


In reality - sadsistic murderer Luke Mitchell’s lies and concoctions would have been a main plank

Corinne Mitchell’s lies and concoctions would have been a main plank

Killer Luke Mitchell’s missing clothing and knives would have been a main plank

The fires/s in the Mitchell’s back garden would have been a main plank

Again there would have been a wealth of “main planks” Donna

Killer Luke Mitchell’s reference to the hair scrunchie would have been a main plank

Killer Luke Mitchell’s reference to the cords/jeans would have been a main plank

Killer Luke Mitchell claiming to the police Jodi Jones was a “missing space” then claiming he thought she had been grounded etc would have been a main plank

Killer Luke Mitchell flat effect would have also been a main plank

Kimberly Thomson would have been a main plank

Killer Luke Mitchell’s fantasy about committing murder would have been a main plank

Killer Luke Mitchell violent nature and “short fuse” would have been a main plank

Killer Luke Mitchell’s behaviour would have been a main plank

Killer Luke Mitchell’s comments about Jodi Jones would have been a main plank

Killer Luke Mitchell planned 5th July 2003 trip to Kenmore would have been a main plank
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 01:45:07 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Parky41

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5064 on: December 06, 2023, 12:16:41 PM »
Donna Easton has done another video

What’s interesting about Donna Easton’s latest two videos is the fact she used Andrew Holburn’s initials in her first video, yet in her second video Donna used the full names of Jodi Jones loved ones, as opposed to just their initials

Suggesting Donna perhaps sees Jodi Jones loved ones as fair game and their privacy isn’t as important as Andrew Holburn’s?

And scammer Sandra Lean is now being referred to by Donna as the title from her second innocence fraud book - “innocents betrayed”

It’s as though it’s the books fault for the bare faced lies, misinformation and disinformation told within its pages as opposed to the books author

And it wasn’t “Jodi’s murder” Donna!  - It was sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s murder!

It shows that the search trio were consistent, but it also implies they agreed with what LM claimed, which is blatantly false.

So it is 20 yards, to 20 yards to 25 yards but nothing of the directly "parallel to" - And nothing of the absolute fact, that anything from the trio around the dog was before and up to the V break and never past it! But then we have access to the transcripts to read, to show this. There is no, the dog coming to a sudden stop, sniffing the air, jumping up the wall and sniffing over it! 

I get the impression, that whilst they wish to highlight the deception in place from Ms Lean, attempt to take some focus away from innocents because they never lied at all, it is still controlled to a degree, of the narrative that it was the dog who alerted to the body!?

What has taken place should make some people sit up and re-think. Those clear time scales that can never be changed!

5 1/2 minutes timed from setting off as a group of four. 40mins from LM (claiming to be home) initiating a search directly to the path, on that path around 8/9mins later. Holds back in the area until the others arrive, meet around 11:22pm (catching sight of each other). Walking down to be in his company, almost at the Gino break. Barely more than 5 1/2 mins later, approx 11:30pm he is shouting out from that woodland.

The barely more is the seconds LM was over the wall. We see clearer now, that whilst LM went to the V with his dog, starting to go up the wall, JaJ's with SK commenced their walk past this point. Around 10 -15ft no more than "20" when LM shouted out from "behind them". That they had already covered a few steps by the time LM was plonking his feet into the woodland?  That AW had stood back from the wall, seeing LM to the right of the V break and not the left. That the other two had ran back that short distance and he was on the other side. It could not be clearer that LM was at least, in excess of 30ft away from that 43ft distance! That everything he described was from an earlier point in time. The tree by type, "5ft in from the wall" The clothing, injuries and that "scrunchy!" I don't believe LM moved into that passage at all now. And if he did, for a couple of feet go left, it had absolutely zero to do with anything to do with that dog!


Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5065 on: December 06, 2023, 12:25:16 PM »
It shows that the search trio were consistent, but it also implies they agreed with what LM claimed, which is blatantly false.

Donna Easton is deceptive and sly

She has clearly had numerous sock puppet accounts (and continues to make more) and yet hypocrite Donna has been accusing people who don’t have numerous fake sock puppet accounts as being “trolls”

Unless hypocrite Donna Easton was referring to Jodi Jones loved ones as being the “trolls” 🙄

Why did Donna Easton choose to take renowned innocence fraud scammer Sandra Lean’s “second hand” stories as fact?

And why did Donna Easton choose to start referring to herself as a “group expert”?
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 01:46:08 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5066 on: December 06, 2023, 12:36:56 PM »

What has taken place should make some people sit up and re-think. Those clear time scales that can never be changed!

You would think it would be a massive red flag

Instead people like Sharon Indy Sunshine are being told to “stay safe” by dangerous, convicted murderers like Ray Gilbert

The same Sharon Indy Sunshine who stated “most of you people need to wise up, you are media sheep unable to think for yourselves ” 🙄
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/10/30/killer-luke-mitchell-naive-cult-like-follower-sharon-indy-sunshines-projections-part-104/
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 12:43:05 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5067 on: December 06, 2023, 12:46:40 PM »
It shows that the search trio were consistent, but it also implies they agreed with what LM claimed, which is blatantly false.

So it is 20 yards, to 20 yards to 25 yards but nothing of the directly "parallel to" - And nothing of the absolute fact, that anything from the trio around the dog was before and up to the V break and never past it!

Maybe Donna Easton will do a video on these facts when she has finally figured this part out ?
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 01:46:35 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5068 on: December 06, 2023, 12:50:55 PM »
What has taken place should make some people sit up and re-think. Those clear time scales that can never be changed!

5 1/2 minutes timed from setting off as a group of four. 40mins from LM (claiming to be home) initiating a search directly to the path, on that path around 8/9mins later. Holds back in the area until the others arrive, meet around 11:22pm (catching sight of each other). Walking down to be in his company, almost at the Gino break. Barely more than 5 1/2 mins later, approx 11:30pm he is shouting out from that woodland.


They don’t appear to be recognising the “panic” described by sadistic murder Luke Mitchell of Alice Walker, Janine Jones and Steven Kelly

The “panic” from the other three that killer Luke Mitchell was no doubt revelling in at the time

There was zero “panic” from killer Luke Mitchell - why would they be ? - This sadist knew what he had done - he knew what they behind that wall
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5069 on: December 06, 2023, 12:53:25 PM »
The barely more is the seconds LM was over the wall. We see clearer now, that whilst LM went to the V with his dog, starting to go up the wall, JaJ's with SK commenced their walk past this point. Around 10 -15ft no more than "20" when LM shouted out from "behind them". That they had already covered a few steps by the time LM was plonking his feet into the woodland?  That AW had stood back from the wall, seeing LM to the right of the V break and not the left. That the other two had ran back that short distance and he was on the other side. It could not be clearer that LM was at least, in excess of 30ft away from that 43ft distance! That everything he described was from an earlier point in time. The tree by type, "5ft in from the wall" The clothing, injuries and that "scrunchy!" I don't believe LM moved into that passage at all now. And if he did, for a couple of feet go left, it had absolutely zero to do with anything to do with that dog!

This fact really stood out in those transcripts

It was as though the sadistic killer had already decided this would be the best vantage point for him as he watched this panicked trio discovering his crime scene

Why didn’t he phone 999 from the moment he claimed he “found something”?

Corinne Mitchell said she was brought up to “respect the police”, so why didn’t killer Luke Mitchell phone them immediately after allegedly seeing what he claimed he saw after climbing through the V break ?

Why did he wait until after Steven Kelly and Alice Walker had climbed over?

Why did he choose to hang this out?

Why didn’t he phone his mother Corinne Mitchell?

Why did he ignore his mothers phone calls - for 90 minutes!?

Not an ounce of emotion - whilst Steven Kelly was retching and Janine Jones and Alice Walker were distraught and all three of them were in shock

Sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell stood behind the V in the wall, separated from the other three (who were on the Roan’s Dyke path side) - and simply did not care
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 01:37:46 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation