March 2010 - Innocence Fraud scammers Billy Middleton and Sandra Lean attended killer Simon Hall’s preliminary appeal hearing in London, instead of attending killer Luke Mitchell’s court appearance in Scotland
11th May 2010 - Joe Jones visited scammers Sandra Lean and Billy Middleton to ask them to remove their abusive nonsense from their WAP website
Billy Middleton was hiding behind scammer Sandra Lean’s door when Joe Jones knocked on their door
Sandra Lean said she had invited Joe Jones in to look at the forensic reports
The following day fraudsters Corinne, Sandra and Billy posted this 👇 gaslighting nonsense on a forum
Corinne Mitchell - 12th May 2010
“Due to personal circumstances Sandra Lean apologises for not posting certain things she was asked for. She has asked me to let you know she will when she is able to do so.
“Con
That is outragious! People post under cover of different names for different reasons
It is not for any of us to expose real names. Depending what is said it can and has put people in danger. Remember we are locals. There was an incident yesterday that I can't go into but it was very scaryand in volved threats to both... MODERATED OUT... and myself..
Sandra Lean - 12th May 2010
“Just for accuracy, it was not me who "outed" myself, ...MODERATED OUT.
Of course I support Luke Mitchell - I have said so publicly for a very long time - I'm really not sure what is meant by Big Wullie's comment. Posting under an assumed name allowed me to put information into the public domain without it appearing to come from me, something which was done for safety.
I am both unable to post anything more than the shortest post due to a very poor internet connection and being forced out of my home (and therefore away from my my documents) as a result of the matter Corinne mentioned.
The documents themselves have had to be moved to a place of safety as well.
Sorry - I will be posting properly again when I am able to do so.
Billy Middleton (then boyfriend of Sandra Lean) - 13th May 2010
“For the record, Sandra had nothing whatsoever to do with my post, she is perfectly capable of posting on her own behalf as and when she chooses to. Or at least that was the position until her safety was compromised and is now left with limited access to the internet as a result.
Acknowledging where plagiarised material has come from (irrespective of how the material is obtained) is in no way the same as having permission to reproduce it.
Further, since a formal request has been issued to remove the material by the copyright holder, the onus is on you to act accordingly (since clearly having included your post in my message it was directed to you).
6 months after the above nonsense sexual deviant Billy Middleton apparently threatened Sandra Lean, after which her youngest adult daughter kicked him out the house
In September 2011 Billy Middleton's old boss Marina made the following statements on another forum
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:01 pm
"After Billy was arrested I sent this email to his parents. I also sent a copy to Sandra Lean, to try and confirm that I was telling the truth.
Flag this message
Re: Please note amended address
Tuesday, 11 November, 2008 9:48
From:
"MARINA THOMASON"
Add sender to Contacts
To:
"Harriets Mail"
Dear Harriet and Jim,
We've got your e-mail and we will pin the address up in the canteen at work. I'm sure one or two of the workers will want to write to Billy. This is a very difficult letter for me to write to you and I've struggled with my conscious whether I should or not.
During the time of Billy and Kareens wedding you were very good to us and you made me feel very welcome in your home, I felt you Harriet and me especially, clicked. You are a nice family. But the truth of the matter is we advised Billy and Kareen to pospone their wedding. I took Kareen aside and Christopher took Billy and advised them to put the wedding off. We did this because we knew the extent of the problems they had in their relationship and feared it would end in disaster. We hoped if they delayed it their relationship would come to its own natural conclusion. We always thought someone would get hurt although we could never forsee this happening.
I don't know to what extent you know of what went on here in Cullivoe. The police were involved on two occasions that we know of. There were numerous other occasions that were kept quiet by the Williamsons here in Yell. Billy and Kareens next door neighbour was very upset by what was happening. She was Christina's chaperone to nursery in the taxi. She said every Friday night was the same, they would be woken up in the middle of the night with Kareen screaming and sometimes she would hear Christina crying. She wanted to report Billy and Kareen to social services but luckily for them she spoke to her sister first about it who lives here in Cullivoe. She suggested speaking to Jean Saunders which she did. Jean said that if anything happened which she was worried about the neighbour was to phone her first. As a consequence Jean and John were in the square on more than one occasion. Kareen and the bairns came here to stay the night one of the times. It was very upsetting for me as my mam had just died suddenly 2 weeks before and I was 6 months pregnant for Amanda. When I answered the phone in the middle of the night to hear Kareen screaming I thought she was being murdered.
We never could figure out what was going on but when Kareen left Billy and went to Brae she told me a few things and it all fitted together like a jig-saw puzzle. I know that she went on to tell her uncle Andy and Gilda even more so don't be too harsh on them because you have to understand that Kareen very much made Billy out to be the bad guy. I don't know the truth of the matter because Kareen told one story and Billy told the opposite.
I don't know where this idea that the Williamsons never visited Kareen here in Cullivoe came from because to my mind it is simply not true. Susan was there at least twice a week, Christina and Lana were best friends. Although Carol doesn't drive she came at least once a week before or after choir practice and if she was working at the school she was there more often. All the family turned up for any birthday parties or occasions.
I know you are living a nightmare at the moment and of course you want to believe Billy, he is your son. We will all have to await what evidence comes out at the trial. I hope you are not to upset by this email that is not my intention at all. No-matter what the truth is of what happened that awful night the letter we wrote from C & A still holds true and I used to call Billy Christophers' right hand. He is a terrible miss at work.
This is a hard thing for everyone involved to come to terms with and our deepest sympathy is with you,
Marina.Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:38 am
"I do feel incredibly angry that Billy Middleton feels that he has the right to publish on the internet whatever he wants without fear of retribution.
Reading his MOJ2010 speech just puts my blood pressure right up because there is hardly one single paragraph that contains the whole truth. Unfortunately there is very little that I can state as "fact" as at it would mean exposing people and information that at the moment has to remain confidential. I am, however, now in a position to comment on the following subject things that I was told as Billy took it upon himself to expose his ex-wife as the person to whom the sexual assault charges concerned.
He himself describes the charge as "sexual abuse". I'm unclear why. As far as I know the charges were of sexual assault. To my mind sexual abuse indicates a more long term situation. A freudian slip, perhaps?. Maybe this was closer to the truth of what was happening in Billy and Kareen's relationship.
However Billy Middleton states: "They then threw in a charge of sexual abuse against my wife instead but both she and her uncle proved in court it was not physically possible because we were about 60 miles apart at the time and the doctor who examined her testified that there was no physical evidence to support it.
Billy put forward a special plea of 'consent' to the sexual assault charges yet in the statement above he is implying that it never happened and that this was "proved in court". He can't have it both ways - either his ex-wife consented or else it didn't happen, not both.
The only 'incident' of sexual assault Kareen discussed with me in any detail was the time that caused her to leave Billy in April/May 2007. Remember, this was about 2 years before the trial and 18 months before the fire. It was the first time I visited her at her aunt and uncle's house in Brae after she left Cullivoe with the kids. She told me what Billy had done to her. Needless to say, I was appalled. She was upset and confused and asked my advice on what to do. She spoke about going back to him as she was afraid if she left him for good what he would do. Billy was constantly texting her and using the children as a weapon against her, saying things like did she really want the kids to come from a broken home and she was to think about the effect all this was having on them. Things like that. I advised her not to go back to him. She was 3 months pregnant with Annalise at the time.
Kareen had not been happy for a long time. Billy spent much of his home time on the computer. Kareen was sure he was in contact with other women. She looked up the history on their computer one day Billy was at work and found that he had googled "rape", "torture" and "p***y fisting". Billy had been visiting hardcore BDSM sites and Kareen was scared - is this what he had in mind for her? She told me things had been escalating against her will in the bedroom. She did not tell me the exact date of when the assault had taken place but I did get the impression that she had waited a few days before leaving him and moving to Brae. She only went to see the GP the day after she moved to Brae on her aunt and uncle's insistance. From my understanding of what Kareen has told me because she had waited a number of days and because she had given birth to 2 children naturally the GP was non-committal about any signs of an assault having taken place.
When Kareen took Billy back most of her family and friends distanced themselves from her including me. I felt embarrassed because I had tried to advise her not to take him back but she had and it felt very awkward. I know her family felt the same way. We have spoke since about the reasons why she took him back and I can absolutely see why she did - she was a typical abused wife caught in a cycle of abuse. She told me that one of the conditions she took him back on was if he saw a counsellor. He showed her a letter with an appointment but does not know if he ever attended. All she knows is that the abuse only ever got worse and because she no longer felt she could turn to her friends and family she was completely isolated.
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:11 am http://simplybillymiddleton.myfreeforum.org/ftopic9-0.php
"For reasons only known to themselves the police never interviewed either myself or Kareen's counsellor whom she was seeing regarding unresolved issues from her childhood and also the difficulties she was experiencing within her own relationship with Billy. She told her counsellor everything.
However, following the trial Kareen's solicitor did take a statement from her counsellor. That is why Billy never fought to see the kids. His lies would be exposed before his family and he couldn't let that happen.
