On the other hand she could be doing Luke more harm than good. If Luke is guilty she's making an impossible situation for him to get back from. Therefor doing him more harm than good!
Luke Mitchell has been found guilty by the courts and sentenced to serve twenty years before he will be considered for parole.
At the time the murder was committed it was a high profile case mainly because of the violence of Jodi's death and the desecration of her body both while she lived and after her death.
I think keeping the details in the public eye and that of the Law Lords is doing Luke more harm than good particularly as he has only a couple of years to go before he can be considered for parole.
I commend Ms Lean for her tireless efforts in this case because it is my opinion that when or if Mitchell is ever considered for parole the board will not be influenced by a documentary riddled with bias and error ~ they will consider all the evidence including trial transcripts and failed appeals and an obvious lack of contrition.
I think which all taken together will ensure the full life tariff the trial judge in effect handed down will be enforced.
Is there the slightest chance Luke Mitchell is not guilty of the heinous crime for which he was convicted??? I would say as much chance as any of the other killers which evidence has put behind bars but who carry out their sentences either protesting innocence or refusing to relinquish details of their victim or victims' remains.
In my opinion Sandra Lean will almost single handed be responsible for keeping society safe from Mitchell and if she had any sense her numerous failed past efforts should indicate that fact to her.
