Author Topic: How can the Mccanns be 100% innocent - when they haven't been 100% been cleared.  (Read 29981 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

Precisely.. You trust Amaral despite proof of incompetence...
I trust Wolters... No evidence of incompetence

No evidence of incompetence


Or what his credibility is ...

A

Offline Mr Gray


No evidence of incompetence


Or what his credibility is ...

A

Proof of incompetence for Amaral... No evidence and nothing to suggest Wolters is incompetent

Offline kizzy

Proof of incompetence for Amaral... No evidence and nothing to suggest Wolters is incompetent

Well as of now what has he got..... information received from the public undesirables ..public at that.

Your words below  D

What those sightings show is how unreliable public Id evidence is...

Double standards or what.

Offline Mr Gray

Well as of now what has he got..... information received from the public undesirables ..public at that.

Your words below  D

What those sightings show is how unreliable public Id evidence is...

Double standards or what.

You've misunderstood.. Its sightings... By the public... That are unreliable... Like the Smith sighting... Unless you believe Maddie has been spotted thousands of times

Offline kizzy

You've misunderstood.. Its sightings... By the public... That are unreliable... Like the Smith sighting... Unless you believe Maddie has been spotted thousands of times

Firstly ...you don't know the smith sighting was unreliable.

Secondly ...how reliable are the statement wolt has incriminating CB. you don't know that either.

Offline Mr Gray

Firstly ...you don't know the smith sighting was unreliable.

Secondly ...how reliable are the statement wolt has incriminating CB. you don't know that either.

I know as a fact that sightings such as the Smith sighting... And the thousands of sightings of Madeleine are unreliable... That is a fact... Not opinion

Offline Vertigo Swirl


IYO

IMO if that was the case it would have been banned.
Banned by whom?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Banned by whom?

You know full well by whom.

But anyway the mccs have spent literally tens of thousands to have TOTL banned.

But seemed all they achieved was to give it maximum publicity,

Offline Brietta

You know full well by whom.

But anyway the mccs have spent literally tens of thousands to have TOTL banned.

But seemed all they achieved was to give it maximum publicity,

Kate and Gerry kept the investigation into Madeleine's disappearance in the public eye for years until Scotland Yard took over.  Wonder why they drew attention to themselves like that - and why SY bothered - if Amaral had already solved the case.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

You know full well by whom.

But anyway the mccs have spent literally tens of thousands to have TOTL banned.

But seemed all they achieved was to give it maximum publicity,

I think he may get some pretty bad publicity from the ECHR soon

Offline Vertigo Swirl

You know full well by whom.

But anyway the mccs have spent literally tens of thousands to have TOTL banned.

But seemed all they achieved was to give it maximum publicity,
No I really don’t, that’s why I asked.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Proof of incompetence for Amaral... No evidence and nothing to suggest Wolters is incompetent

The real incompetents are the T9  - Those parents 100% responsible for children's safety. can't really keep dressing that up as Amaral's fault. Especially since Uk police have had millions chucked at it and  ZERO,ZILTCH NADA.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Anthro

The real incompetents are the T9  - Those parents 100% responsible for children's safety. can't really keep dressing that up as Amaral's fault. Especially since Uk police have had millions chucked at it and  ZERO,ZILTCH NADA.
I agree, MissTaken. Parents are 100% responsible for the wellbeing of their children. In reality though, it is impossible to be present all the time in any given context and circumstance. In the case of Madeleine, Sean and Amelie, I believe Gerry and Kate made decisions, as responsible and caring parents, that would be logistically practical during their vacation. They had no knowledge, reference or prejudice re. pedophiles in the region.

Offline barrier

I agree, MissTaken. Parents are 100% responsible for the wellbeing of their children. In reality though, it is impossible to be present all the time in any given context and circumstance. In the case of Madeleine, Sean and Amelie, I believe Gerry and Kate made decisions, as responsible and caring parents, that would be logistically practical during their vacation. They had no knowledge, reference or prejudice re. pedophiles in the region.

With that in mind, what difference does it make, with still no definitive answer to what happened on the night of 3/05/2007.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Anthro

With that in mind, what difference does it make, with still no definitive answer to what happened on the night of 3/05/2007.
Contextually, it does make a difference Barrier. The German investigation, to me, stumbled upon data connected to Madeleine’s disappearance. Listening to Mr Wolters, his emphasis is not on apartment 5A, but rather what has happened to Madeleine after she left/was removed from 5A.