Author Topic: How can the Mccanns be 100% innocent - when they haven't been 100% been cleared.  (Read 29941 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

I don't know how they worked it exactly but where there's a will there's a way.

When they release the official police files to the public, like police in any good democracy should, then we'll find out what went on.
So you can't rationalise it just I thought.  Thanks for that!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

I don't know how they worked it exactly but where there's a will there's a way.

When they release the official police files to the public, like police in any good democracy should, then we'll find out what went on.

This isn't going to happen.  So dream on.

Offline G-Unit

So in your opinion when the Met conducted their major review of all the evidence they saw all the evidence pointing to the McCanns but decided to ignore it on orders from above?

If you examine evidence looking for leads which might lead to an abductor then that's what you'll find.

Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood, who is leading the review, said: ‘We genuinely believe there is a possibility she is alive.’

He revealed his dedicated team – of 28 officers and seven civilian staff – had identified 195 ‘investigative opportunities’ to follow up after examining a huge bundle of material, including a number of potential sightings from around the world.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2134756/Maddie-alive--Scotland-Yard-team-reviewing-case-abandoned-Portuguese-195-leads-believe-finally-end-McCanns-torment.html

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

If you examine evidence looking for leads which might lead to an abductor then that's what you'll find.

Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood, who is leading the review, said: ‘We genuinely believe there is a possibility she is alive.’

He revealed his dedicated team – of 28 officers and seven civilian staff – had identified 195 ‘investigative opportunities’ to follow up after examining a huge bundle of material, including a number of potential sightings from around the world.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2134756/Maddie-alive--Scotland-Yard-team-reviewing-case-abandoned-Portuguese-195-leads-believe-finally-end-McCanns-torment.html
So in your opinion when the Met conducted their major review of all the evidence they saw all the evidence pointing to the McCanns but decided to ignore it on orders from above? They had McCann blinkers on did they?  Trained themselves to avert their gaze from the huge mountain of evidence in the files pointing to parental involvement did they?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

So in your opinion when the Met conducted their major review of all the evidence they saw all the evidence pointing to the McCanns but decided to ignore it on orders from above? They had McCann blinkers on did they?  Trained themselves to avert their gaze from the huge mountain of evidence in the files pointing to parental involvement did they?

This all ought to be laughable, but somehow it isn't.  But then there are a lot of very sad people out there for whom only the death of Madeleine at the hands of her parents will do.

This is never going to happen.  And the longer it goes on then the more incensed they will become.

Good hunting, you all.  I have ceased to feel sorry for you.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

This all ought to be laughable, but somehow it isn't.  But then there are a lot of very sad people out there for whom only the death of Madeleine at the hands of her parents will do.

This is never going to happen.  And the longer it goes on then the more incensed they will become.

Good hunting, you all.  I have ceased to feel sorry for you.
It is a bloody joke the fact that people have to believe all sorts of nonsense in order to rationalise their beliefs (in this case that the British Police were ordered (by whom?) to only consider the abduction theory, thereby ignoring any evidence that pointed to parental involvement and the German police force have simply gone along with it too). 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

It is a bloody joke the fact that people have to believe all sorts of nonsense in order to rationalise their beliefs (in this case that the British Police were ordered (by whom?) to only consider the abduction theory, thereby ignoring any evidence that pointed to parental involvement and the German police force have simply gone along with it too).

All this nonsense can be firmly put to bed when someone proves Maddie was.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Eleanor

It is a bloody joke the fact that people have to believe all sorts of nonsense in order to rationalise their beliefs (in this case that the British Police were ordered (by whom?) to only consider the abduction theory, thereby ignoring any evidence that pointed to parental involvement and the German police force have simply gone along with it too).

Colin Sutton was a bit too smart on that one.  He never said who told him that.  This could have been sour grapes because he was never asked in the first place.

But who cares.  He wasn't asked.  But not really surprising since he didn't know how to keep his mouth shut.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

All this nonsense can be firmly put to bed when someone proves Maddie was.
What would you accept as proof that she was abducted?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Colin Sutton was a bit too smart on that one.  He never said who told him that.  This could have been sour grapes because he was never asked in the first place.

But who cares.  He wasn't asked.  But not really surprising since he didn't know how to keep his mouth shut.

Whoever spoke to Sutton never mentioned the McCanns

Offline G-Unit

Whoever spoke to Sutton never mentioned the McCanns

This officer told me I would do better to avoid the McCann investigation if it did happen, because "You wouldn't be happy leading an investigation where you were told what you could look at and what you could not".
http://colinsutton.blogspot.com/2017/05/madeleine-mccann-and-operation-grange_9.html
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

This officer told me I would do better to avoid the McCann investigation if it did happen, because "You wouldn't be happy leading an investigation where you were told what you could look at and what you could not".
http://colinsutton.blogspot.com/2017/05/madeleine-mccann-and-operation-grange_9.html

So what was the name of this officer?  Did he actually exist?

Offline Mr Gray

This officer told me I would do better to avoid the McCann investigation if it did happen, because "You wouldn't be happy leading an investigation where you were told what you could look at and what you could not".
http://colinsutton.blogspot.com/2017/05/madeleine-mccann-and-operation-grange_9.html

As I've said before he didn't say he wouldn't be able to look at the McCanns.. He may well have meant he would need permission from the Portuguese to look at anyone...Sutton assumed he meant the McCanns

Offline Mr Gray

If the McCanns are not suspects then they are clearly ruled out of the investigation at this moment in time... They are clearly not suspects

Offline G-Unit

If the McCanns are not suspects then they are clearly ruled out of the investigation at this moment in time... They are clearly not suspects

That's obvious. What isn't obvious is why. I'm no detective but when people say the alarm was raised at or after 10pm why are there people who say they heard about it before or at 10pm?

That night, at around 2200 she learned that Madeleine had disappeared, and together with her colleagues she helped look for her.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/EMMA_WILDING.htm

That on the May 03, 2007, at around 22H45, she was in the bar known as ?Mirage? together with her colleagues, whose names are Emma, Shinead, Najoua Hayley and Stacy, which is situated close to the perimeter of the aforementioned resort. After returning from the bathroom, she was informed by her colleague Hayley that a child, of about 3 years of age, and whom was staying at the Ocean Club, had disappeared;
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/SUSAN-OWEN.htm

2200 or 2245? Thats a big difference.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0