Does Wolters have photographic evidence?

[sadie]

Amaral & that Cristovao bloke helped Martin Ney & Brueckner abduct Maddie, Joana & Renee Hasee.

I believe Wolters has photographic evidence of all of this.

Oh really?   I always wonderted

[Vertigo Swirl]

given that Amaral wrote
 "I, therefore, scrupulously respected the rules of the judiciary police and I refrained from making any comment" and given that you've conceded he blabbed to a reporter before being taken off the case, is it not fair comment to call the man a liar?

This was a question for G-Unit.  It has so far remained unanswered, maybe she missed it?  Asking again in hope of a reply this time...

[Eleanor]

This was a question for G-Unit.  It has so far remained unanswered, maybe she missed it?  Asking again in hope of a reply this time...

I doubt you'll get one.

Members aren't obliged to answer questions. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

I doubt you'll get one.

Members aren't obliged to answer questions. 

Sometimes it's the questions that they choose not to answer that offer the greater insight...

[Brietta]

Sometimes it's the questions that they choose not to answer that offer the greater insight...

Much as the questions Wolters said he was not presently allowed to answer speak volumes.

[Wonderfulspam]

Much as the questions Wolters said he was not presently allowed to answer speak volumes.

Yes, if you want to believe an anonymous allegation of the existence of photo evidence.

[barrier]

Much as the questions Wolters said he was not presently allowed to answer speak volumes.

More pertinently, Wolters is not allowed to ask.

[Brietta]

More pertinently, Wolters is not allowed to ask.

                                        ?

[kizzy]

Much as the questions Wolters said he was not presently allowed to answer speak volumes.

The volumes it speaks to me is he is very unprofessional

Why have an interview then say he is allowed to answer could mean more like ....he doesn't know the answer.

[Brietta]

The volumes it speaks to me is he is very unprofessional

Why have an interview then say he is allowed to answer could mean more like ....he doesn't know the answer.

I believe the interview was primarily given because Volters was publicising the German interest in information gathering to further Madeleine's case not giving Brueckner the get out of jail card of gifting him information already in his possession.
I think he is building as waterproof a case as he possibly can in the hope of keeping this already judicially proven monster behind bars for life which is exactly where he should be.  My opinion.

[Brietta]

I think it is becoming apparent according to the Sunday times article today, that there may be parallels between the brutal rape of Ms Behan and Madeleine's abduction.

It is not known if the rape was filmed.

But the witness statement given by Ms Behan describing her ordeal and her assailant might be a possible match with photographic evidence already in BKA hands connected to Brueckner.


Modified to correct that the rape was filmed
Snip
He also set up a video camera and produced a bag of chains and whips before removing her clothes with a scissors.
https://www.irishcentral.com/news/german-prosecutors-madeleine-mccann-rape-irish-woman

[Wonderfulspam]

I believe the interview was primarily given because Volters was publicising the German interest in information gathering to further Madeleine's case not giving Brueckner the get out of jail card of gifting him information already in his possession.
I think he is building as waterproof a case as he possibly can in the hope of keeping this already judicially proven monster behind bars for life which is exactly where he should be.  My opinion.

Yes, he's building a water tight case.....

With no evidence Maddie was abducted.

No evidence Brueckner ever set foot in 5a.

No DNA or forensic evidence linking Brueckner to Maddie & no body or parts of a body.

Good luck taking that to court.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes, he's building a water tight case.....

With no evidence Maddie was abducted.

No evidence Brueckner ever set foot in 5a.

No DNA or forensic evidence linking Brueckner to Maddie & no body or parts of a body.

Good luck taking that to court.

Is this what you hope or what you know? if the latter how is it you have gained such privileged access into the German investigation?

[Wonderfulspam]

Is this what you hope or what you know? if the latter how is it you have gained such privileged access into the German investigation?

It's just the facts. Don't blame me.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's just the facts. Don't blame me.

Wolters has claimed he does have evidence of Brückner’s involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance.  He claims that if we knew what it was we would agree with him.  I take it you have privileged access to this evidence and can state as fact that he has nothing at all?  If so what is it, perhaps you can tell us?