Does Wolters have photographic evidence?

[Lace]

Share what fgs - keeping up with the case for nearly 14 years.

Well obviously I meant share your theory.   I would be interested to see why you think the McCann's are involved,  something that the Police forces investigating the case have failed to see.

[Brietta]

So what have you done - popped over to Germany - for you to be so confident it is CB who took Maddie.

Or, just going on what you have seen in media/interviews. ..CB is only a suspect/person of interest nothing to prove he was involved with maddie. all what you have posted is what YOU think is happening ...it doesnt mean to say it is.

Where I don't have to pop anywhere everything is there to read what has gone on in this case with the mccs.

All official statements court cases ect ect all official not just stuff from a prosecutor that no one knows any thing about, B

I'm not making the claim for myself that you claim for yourself and mainly when I am posting I at least make the attempt to stick to the thread topic.
This one relates to whether or not Wolters has photographic evidence which may be linking Brueckner, the prime suspect in Madeleine's case to her disappearance.

Your 'investigation' on which you seem to have built your opinion is fourteen years old;  maybe time to have a look at how the case has moved on since the Portuguese archived it? 
Starting with Amaral's fact that Brueckner was investigated by the PJ back in the day and now fourteen years down the line he has popped up once more thanks to Amaral's 'inside knowledge', only this time as a prime suspect with an interest in photography among other things..

[Mr Gray]

So what have you done - popped over to Germany - for you to be so confident it is CB who took Maddie.

Or, just going on what you have seen in media/interviews. ..CB is only a suspect/person of interest nothing to prove he was involved with maddie. all what you have posted is what YOU think is happening ...it doesnt mean to say it is.

Where I don't have to pop anywhere everything is there to read what has gone on in this case with the mccs.

All official statements court cases ect ect all official not just stuff from a prosecutor that no one knows any thing about, B

I've seen all the official statements you have and I don't see anything that points to the McCanns guilt. We know the original investigation did not understand  the evidence... That's thr mistake some posters make

[kizzy]

I've seen all the official statements you have and I don't see anything that points to the McCanns guilt. We know the original investigation did not understand  the evidence... That's thr mistake some posters make

But yet also @B

The mccs have not been completely cleared of any involvement for what happened to Maddie it seems.

This thread has been built round a photo that you don't even know exist, just reading into something wolt refused to answer when asked if he had photo/video.

[Mr Gray]

But yet also @B

The mccs have not been completely cleared of any involvement for what happened to Maddie it seems.

This thread has been built round a photo that you don't even know exist, just reading into something wolt refused to answer when asked if he had photo/video.

This "not being totally cleared" is total rubbish. The Needham family havent been totally cleared of any involvement in Bens disappearnce...its not  anormal thing to happen. They have never been officially accused of anything...never been charged.

If they were charged and found not guilty that wouldnt totally clear them. I think you are posting total rubbish.

They are clearly not suspects.

Ive said its possible taht this photo exists....based on sound logic...I dont expect you to accept it. if it does exist ..as it may...It certainly clears teh McCanns

[kizzy]

This "not being totally cleared" is total rubbish. The Needham family havent been totally cleared of any involvement in Bens disappearnce...its not  anormal thing to happen. They have never been officially accused of anything...never been charged.

If they were charged and found not guilty that wouldnt totally clear them. I think you are posting total rubbish.

They are clearly not suspects.

Ive said its possible taht this photo exists....based on sound logic...I dont expect you to accept it. if it does exist ..as it may...It certainly clears teh McCanns

 if it does exist ..as it may...It certainly clears teh McCanns

So my post is not rubbish after all  - as it seems to bother you they are not cleared or else why make a point of it.

True though, as of now there is no photo/of Maddie in wolts possession.

[Mr Gray]

 if it does exist ..as it may...It certainly clears teh McCanns

So my post is not rubbish after all  - as it seems to bother you they are not cleared or else why make a point of it.

True though, as of now there is no photo/of Maddie in wolts possession.

I think you misunderstand.. It wouldnt bother me if the McCanns were arrested tomorrow... I'm just an interested observer giving my view

[misty]

Am I correct in believing that, in 2007, a time & date stamp had to be added manually on videos taken on a VCR? It may be that BKA have some video evidence/stills from CB's USB's but they cannot positively link the VCR to him.

[kizzy]

I think you misunderstand.. It wouldnt bother me if the McCanns were arrested tomorrow... I'm just an interested observer giving my view

Yes, and so am I.

[Anthro]

Am I correct in believing that, in 2007, a time & date stamp had to be added manually on videos taken on a VCR? It may be that BKA have some video evidence/stills from CB's USB's but they cannot positively link the VCR to him.

I have looked back at our video material from 2006/7 and the Canon recorder’s default setting was time and date-stamped. I agree, Misty. The BKA possibly have photographic material but cannot link the device it was recorded on, to Brückner in particular. Hence, Davel’s observation that they need more information on his properties to see if there is some identifiable feature matching what they have.

[Anthro]

Such a time and date-stamped piece of material may also explain Wolters’ announcement that Madeleine was killed within a couple of days of/shortly after her disappearance (?)

[Brietta]

Such a time and date-stamped piece of material may also explain Wolters’ announcement that Madeleine was killed within a couple of days of/shortly after her disappearance (?)

I sincerely hope not.  But it does tie in with reports of a call to another pervert on the dark web detailing his fantasy.

[Anthro]

I sincerely hope not.  But it does tie in with reports of a call to another pervert on the dark web detailing his fantasy.

I know, Brietta.😔

[Holly Goodhead]

According to the following CB will never be charged as there's no evidence linking him to MM's diappearance:

British detectives are said to have told the couple that they think it is "highly unlikely Christian Brueckner will be charged over Madeleine's disappearance as there is no evidence" linking him to it.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14764062/madeleine-mccann-parents-hunt-missing-daughter-end-probe/

[Vertigo Swirl]

According to the following CB will never be charged as there's no evidence linking him to MM's diappearance:

British detectives are said to have told the couple that they think it is "highly unlikely Christian Brueckner will be charged over Madeleine's disappearance as there is no evidence" linking him to it.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14764062/madeleine-mccann-parents-hunt-missing-daughter-end-probe/

Before anyone gets too excited it is an unnamed source quoting unnamed British detectives in a tabloid report, and I know what many of you sceptics think of those!