Author Topic: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?  (Read 44380 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #225 on: May 01, 2021, 10:39:20 AM »
No, it wouldn't be Libellous.  Amaral is a convicted perjurer.

If someone writes that he's lying about his motives for writing his book but can't prove it that's libel, whatever has happened in his past. Even convicted purjurers can't be assumed to lie about everything.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #226 on: May 01, 2021, 10:48:29 AM »
Amaral & that Cristovao bloke helped Martin Ney & Brueckner abduct Maddie, Joana & Renee Hasee.

I believe Wolters has photographic evidence of all of this.

This is what I said previously in another thread.

Smitman deposited Madeleine's remains some where, some one saw him, picked the package up thinking it was swag, boy did they get a surprise, took pictures for some perverted pleasure, prove it wrong mr prosecuter.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #227 on: May 01, 2021, 10:53:19 AM »
I get the link now, Wolters has a snap of Amaral.

Do you really think so!!!  WOW ... have a care though, you could be quoted on that.

There hasn't been much physical contact between investigators of late.  Probably no requirement these days given the ease of video conferencing but some things do take time to arrange and one obstacle is getting the legal formalities in place to interview witnesses.

I think that very soon we will see movement on that; and if the Portuguese are involved in the process it shouldn't be too long before we are privy to a version of events 😀

Snip

Scotland Yard’s hunt for Madeleine’s abductor continues, with four detectives still working on Operation Grange.

A top-level summit between German, British and Portuguese detectives is due to take place in Lisbon this summer.

The Mirror revealed in January that cops are launching a push to find what they have referred to as the “missing piece of the jigsaw” that they say could snare Brueckner.

German and Portuguese investigators are to carry out new interviews of key witnesses in the Algarve who knew him.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccanns-parents-refuse-give-24015255
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #228 on: May 01, 2021, 10:54:47 AM »
You are wrong.

His rant to a reporter led to him being taken off the case.

"The source close to the PJ" convention which had been in force for some time was disregarded on this occasion so perhaps his public comment was made inadvertently ~ but it was 'public comment' and it was made prior to his retirement.

Oh yes, I forgot about that.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #229 on: May 01, 2021, 10:59:37 AM »
I seem to remember the 3 burglars were about to be nailed according to the red tops back in 2013.

I wonder whatever happened to all that evidence against them?

Or maybe they are still in the frame, as Brueckner's accomplices, along with Hewlett, some gardeners & a dead black guy.

Has anyone thought of that yet?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Brietta

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #230 on: May 01, 2021, 11:47:23 AM »
If someone writes that he's lying about his motives for writing his book but can't prove it that's libel, whatever has happened in his past. Even convicted purjurers can't be assumed to lie about everything.

Nice deflection but I would really like to see a proper discussion of salient points made by members while recognising that attack is the best form of defence.

Misty mused on the question of why given his financial predicament he would voluntarily leave secure employment to take such a leap in the dark.

Snip
The question I'd really like answered is why a cop, mired in debt, thought it would be a really good move to give up a steady job with regular income to release a book about an unsolved case.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=12049.msg649761#msg649761

While Carana wrote >
TOTL:
"Certainly, this book responds to the need I felt to defend myself, having been discredited by the institution for which I worked for more than twenty-six years, without being given any chance to explain myself, publicly or within the institution itself. I made the request several times, but it was never heard.
 Amaral

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=12049.msg649789#msg649789

Nobody libelling a nobody there; rather just two good points for debate.

I think the contrast between whatever evidence Wolters has and the manner in which he has conducted the investigation couldn't be more marked.

That there have been witness statements taken is irrefutable and the likelihood that there may have been photographic information available either as a result of public appeal or from searches is high.  The fact that Wolter's cannot speak about that is very revealing.
Snip
Detectives confirmed they dug up 8,000 pieces of potential evidence which had been buried at an abandoned German box factory owned by Christian B.

It is alleged at least some of this disturbing material includes videos and pictures of his suspected crimes - with the files found on hard drives and USB sticks in a plastic bag.

The material was buried alongside his dead dog at the dilapidated and rubbish filed site in Neuwegers­leben.

Mr Wolters however declined to confirm if any of these pictures and videos includes evidence linked to the Madeleine case.

Speaking on Aussie TV, he said: "At the moment, I am not allowed to contend on that, so I am not able to say if there are pictures or there are no pictures of Madeleine."


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11975041/madeleine-mccann-evidence-dead-christian-b-buried-videos/
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #231 on: May 01, 2021, 11:55:21 AM »

Detectives confirmed they dug up 8,000 pieces of potential evidence which had been buried at an abandoned German box factory owned by Christian B.

It is alleged at least some of this disturbing material includes videos and pictures of his suspected crimes - with the files found on hard drives and USB sticks in a plastic bag.


Alleged by whom?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #232 on: May 01, 2021, 12:28:10 PM »
I seem to remember the 3 burglars were about to be nailed according to the red tops back in 2013.

I wonder whatever happened to all that evidence against them?

Or maybe they are still in the frame, as Brueckner's accomplices, along with Hewlett, some gardeners & a dead black guy.

Has anyone thought of that yet?


They'll get there, have faith.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline jassi

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #233 on: May 01, 2021, 01:17:56 PM »
Detectives confirmed they dug up 8,000 pieces of potential evidence which had been buried at an abandoned German box factory owned by Christian B.

It is alleged at least some of this disturbing material includes videos and pictures of his suspected crimes - with the files found on hard drives and USB sticks in a plastic bag.


Alleged by whom?


Some hack reporter, without a doubt.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #234 on: May 01, 2021, 02:02:48 PM »
And? obviously the coals aren't cold yet, talk about bitter, mind I like a pint of it, so keep pouring.

What goes cold on Perjury?  Amaral is a convicted liar.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #235 on: May 01, 2021, 02:05:39 PM »
Amaral & that Cristovao bloke helped Martin Ney & Brueckner abduct Maddie, Joana & Renee Hasee.

I believe Wolters has photographic evidence of all of this.

You could be right.  Thank you for saying so.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #236 on: May 01, 2021, 02:12:04 PM »
Oh yes, I forgot about that.
given that Amaral wrote
 "I, therefore, scrupulously respected the rules of the judiciary police and I refrained from making any comment" and given that you've conceded he blabbed to a reporter before being taken off the case, is it not fair comment to call the man a liar?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #237 on: May 01, 2021, 02:16:05 PM »
If someone writes that he's lying about his motives for writing his book but can't prove it that's libel, whatever has happened in his past. Even convicted purjurers can't be assumed to lie about everything.

Well, that's a new one.  Amaral was convicted of Perjury by a Portuguese Court.  Was that not good enough for you?

It is bad enough to Commit Perjury In Court, but he won't do it again?  Okay, if you say so.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #238 on: May 01, 2021, 02:19:36 PM »
Oh yes, I forgot about that.

You appear to be very good at forgetting.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #239 on: May 01, 2021, 03:43:20 PM »
Detectives confirmed they dug up 8,000 pieces of potential evidence which had been buried at an abandoned German box factory owned by Christian B.

It is alleged at least some of this disturbing material includes videos and pictures of his suspected crimes - with the files found on hard drives and USB sticks in a plastic bag.


Alleged by whom?

The Dog?  Presuming it was even dead.  Who can possibly tell?