More recent events related to Madeleine McCann's case

[Eleanor]

The guy charged is an ex-commando, trained to kill, so   a good comparison with CB =IMO

I am not sure what you mean.

There are often comments that don't make a lot of sense, but then we are all getting good at obfuscation.

You actually rarely put yourself on the line.  However, I have seen enough of your comments to know that you are far from stupid.  So you haven't fooled me.

Your own opinion is fine by me, excepting that I am still not sure of exactly what that opinion is.

Oh God, never end a sentence with, "Is".

[Eleanor]

If he did... The same reason others do.  If a paedophile takes a child... Murfer normally follows

Do you know something?  I don't know that.  Possibly because I don't want to.  I will deal with it if it actually happened.

Some of us like me go on hoping.  Which probably makes me no where quite as logical as you.

[Venturi Swirl]

Why do you think CB took the leap to murder, bearing in mind he's not even been questioned yet.

You question makes no logical sense.

[Eleanor]

You question makes no logical sense.

No, it actually doesn't make sense.  But then we are all at it at the moment.  Some of us are better at it than others

The use of words you see.

This is all good.  But nothing to do with Madeleine McCann.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

You question makes no logical sense.

It makes sense to me.

Barrier is asking what it is that makes them believe that CB became a murderer... given what we know about his previous. Barrier adds that CB hasn't even been questioned yet which gives anyone less to go on in order to form the opinion that CB had started killing people.

[Mr Gray]

It makes sense to me.

Barrier is asking what it is that makes them believe that CB became a murderer... given what we know about his previous. Barrier adds that CB hasn't even been questioned yet which gives anyone less to go on in order to form the opinion that CB had started killing people.

Two simple questions..
Do you think it's possible Maddie, was, abducted

Do you think it's, possible CB murdered her

[Eleanor]

It makes sense to me.

Barrier is asking what it is that makes them believe that CB became a murderer... given what we know about his previous. Barrier adds that CB hasn't even been questioned yet which gives anyone less to go on in order to form the opinion that CB had started killing people.

Who said that Brueckner had started killing people?  No one has said that on this Forum.  So where did you get that idea?

[Venturi Swirl]

It makes sense to me.

Barrier is asking what it is that makes them believe that CB became a murderer... given what we know about his previous. Barrier adds that CB hasn't even been questioned yet which gives anyone less to go on in order to form the opinion that CB had started killing people.

It is an entirely illogical question as whether or not Brückner has been questioned has absolutely nothing to do why why someone might consider him capable of murder.  And it’s not as if he’s going to explain what did or didn’t mske him a murderer when questioned anyway.  He could deny it, tell us he’s a kind and gentle man that was busy knitting stump socks for lepers that night, it doesn’t mean he’s telling the truth.

[Wonderfulspam]

Who said that Brueckner had started killing people?  No one has said that on this Forum.  So where did you get that idea?

Surely anyone saying they believe Wolters has solved the case is agreeing Brueckner is a murderer, aren't they?

[Wonderfulspam]

It is an entirely illogical question as whether or not Brückner has been questioned has absolutely nothing to do why why someone might consider him capable of murder.  And it’s not as if he’s going to explain what did or didn’t mske him a murderer when questioned anyway.  He could deny it, tell us he’s a kind and gentle man that was busy knitting stump socks for lepers that night, it doesn’t mean he’s telling the truth.

But he must be presumed innocent.

So yes, we can only presume he was busy darning when Maddie disappeared.

Unless we can prove otherwise of course.

[Brietta]

Surely anyone saying they believe Wolters has solved the case is agreeing Brueckner is a murderer, aren't they?

Brueckner wasn't a rapist until he was convicted.  At the moment - he is not a murderer.  I thought you knew that was understood.

[Brietta]

But he must be presumed innocent.

So yes, we can only presume he was busy darning when Maddie disappeared.

Unless we can prove otherwise of course.

Sceptics just cannot get their heads around the concept of innocent until proven guilty.

[Wonderfulspam]

Brueckner wasn't a rapist until he was convicted.  At the moment - he is not a murderer.  I thought you knew that was understood.

He's not a ŕapist now either, he hasn't been raping anyone for about 17 years now.

[Brietta]

He's not a ŕapist now either, he hasn't been raping anyone for about 17 years now.

He is a rapist - and a torturer.  No eulogy will change the fact of his criminality.

[Wonderfulspam]

He is a rapist - and a torturer.  No eulogy will change the fact of his criminality.

Yes he raped & tortured someone in 2005, but that was a long time ago now & we can't hold it against him indefinitely.

It doesn't necessarily make him a bad person, we all make mistakes.