Sandra's exit - The real reasons

[Hawthorn]

A lot of us said we would read the book once it's available

Why would Parky publish anything to counter SL’s misinformation?
The convicted killer child isn’t going anywhere.

[Dexter]

Why would Parky publish anything to counter SL’s misinformation?
The convicted killer child isn’t going anywhere.

Dunno they just mentioned it.

[Dexter]

I agree. I have absolutely no idea what Parky's book may bring to the table but SLs has brought nothing but misinformation and conspiracy theories. No court papers, just supposition on the part of SL.

That isn't true though is it. You might not agree with her findings but she has definitely seen the case paperwork.

[faithlilly]

That isn't true though is it. You might not agree with her findings but she has definitely seen the case paperwork.

As Gustave Le Bon opined,

“The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim.”

[Hawthorn]

As Gustave Le Bon opined,

“The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim.”

Bit of a ironic contradiction from a Sandra Lean Supporter.
Next you be quoting Anton LaVey.

[Hawthorn]

And we all know who's a big fan of him.

[mrswah]

I agree. I have absolutely no idea what Parky's book may bring to the table but SLs has brought nothing but misinformation and conspiracy theories. No court papers, just supposition on the part of SL.

I can't agree with you: SL has probably got some things wrong, but , in my view, her book is very well researched.

Parky hasn't  said he will write a book: Nicholas suggested that he ought to!  Hope he does, actually, as I'd like to read a book by someone who believes LM is guilty.

[Nicholas]

YouTube have put it back on. Maybe this time it will stay...who knows.

‘James English exposes Shaun Attwood’ ➡️ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MXuuPVvRGhY

[Hawthorn]

‘James English exposes Shaun Attwood’ ➡️ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MXuuPVvRGhY

What a lot of sanctimonious claptrap from a couple of numpties.
I suspect it’s merely a cheap ploy to garner controversial rivalry+publicity ratings=revenue especially since Mr Attwood has been a very naughty boy recently.
Any bets on for Parky vs Lean?

[Dexter]

‘James English exposes Shaun Attwood’ ➡️ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MXuuPVvRGhY

Doesn't make good viewing does it.

[Nicholas]

Doesn't make good viewing does it.

’Shaun Attwood GASLIGHTS James English (& Everyone Else)’

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=J9IUqSn0ilE&feature=youtu.be

[faithlilly]

What a lot of sanctimonious claptrap from a couple of numpties.
I suspect it’s merely a cheap ploy to garner controversial rivalry+publicity ratings=revenue especially since Mr Attwood has been a very naughty boy recently.
Any bets on for Parky vs Lean?

No chance. Parky would have to reveal his identity.

[Hawthorn]

No chance. Parky would have to reveal his identity.

Perhaps a masquerade game of Cluedo could be arranged?

But I suspect Dr Lean could be a bit of a bad sport with her almighty protests of foul play and corruption with examples of  “Professor Plum couldn’t have done it, he was at home cooking dinner for his dear mother!!”

[faithlilly]

Perhaps a masquerade game of Cluedo could be arranged?

But I suspect Dr Lean could be a bit of a bad sport with her almighty protests of foul play and corruption with examples of  “Professor Plum couldn’t have done it, he was at home cooking dinner for his dear mother!!”

Or perhaps a grown up discussion regarding the murder of a child would be more appropriate.

I feel whichever way it came about Parky would be on the back foot. It’s one thing presenting speculation as fact, another completely actually backing up that speculation with evidence.

[Hawthorn]

Or perhaps a grown up discussion regarding the murder of a child would be more appropriate.

I feel whichever way it came about Parky would be on the back foot. It’s one thing presenting speculation as fact, another completely actually backing up that speculation with evidence.

I completely agree, this is about the hideous murder of a child by someone she loved and trusted.
I certainly don't speak on Parky behalf nor would I ever endorse such a debate for it would only do so to promote her book which of course would be her primary purpose.

If a debate was indeed to take place on her gameship rules of masquerading misinformation to research and innuendo to facts combined with her talent for suggestive thinking with us lesser mortals I'm sure the good doctor would be in a great advantage to win just a contest.

However I am yet to read or see any such debate or discussion from any of her fellow peers in regards to this case or for that matter on this very forum.
I wonder why that is?