The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect

[Mr Gray]

Criminal defamation differs from civil defamation, so the two aren't the same LOL. Perhaps a complaint about Wolters has been made for all we know.

It seems the 'half a fingerprint' evidence in the Behan case is a journalistic invention. It's very difficult to decide which are 'known facts' and which are speculations, that's for sure.

It was John who first mentioned libel so take it up with him if it's important to you.
So... Explain the difference or stop trying to deflect from the point.
The point is he has shown he has the resources to launch a libel action... So why hasn't he... Is he not concerned as much as you are with his human rights.
You say he may have... More speculation from you which you continually criticise from others.. LOL

[G-Unit]

It was John who first mentioned libel so take it up with him if it's important to you.
So... Explain the difference or stop trying to deflect from the point.
The point is he has shown he has the resources to launch a libel action... So why hasn't he... Is he not concerned as much as you are with his human rights.
You say he may have... More speculation from you which you continually criticise from others.. LOL

How many 'resources' does it take to complain of a crime?

[G-Unit]

It was John who first mentioned libel so take it up with him if it's important to you.
So... Explain the difference or stop trying to deflect from the point.
The point is he has shown he has the resources to launch a libel action... So why hasn't he... Is he not concerned as much as you are with his human rights.
You say he may have... More speculation from you which you continually criticise from others.. LOL

You are speculating when you say he hasn't acted against Wolters. How do you know?

[Brietta]

You are speculating when you say he hasn't acted against Wolters. How do you know?

Because Fulscher would have told us.

[Mr Gray]

You are speculating when you say he hasn't acted against Wolters. How do you know?

You are getting worse. LOL

[Mr Gray]

How many 'resources' does it take to complain of a crime?

Then he has the resources to make a libel claim against Wolters....you are tying yourself in knots

[Brietta]

The allegation complained of regarding the TV journalists concerns the death of two dogs on the allegation the intention of which was to make Brueckner "contemptible".

I see that lawyer and client have certainly got their priorities right. 

It is an interesting piece in the game being played when one considers what lay buried beneath another of the animals associate with Brueckner and bearing in mind his present title of "Prime Suspect" in the case of a missing - presumed murdered - child.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Criminal defamation differs from civil defamation, so the two aren't the same LOL. Perhaps a complaint about Wolters has been made for all we know.

It seems the 'half a fingerprint' evidence in the Behan case is a journalistic invention. It's very difficult to decide which are 'known facts' and which are speculations, that's for sure.

Second time of asking - says who?  I would genuinely like to know upon what basis you have written off this report as fake news.  Has HCW said as much?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Because Fulscher would have told us.

Would it not have to be lodged with the courts if a complaint regarding his human rights had been made, and would this not be available for all to see?

[Eleanor]

Second time of asking - says who?  I would genuinely like to know upon what basis you have written off this report as fake news.  Has HCW said as much?

Are we now saying that somedebody lied about this fingerprint in The Behan Case?  I have lost the plot again and I am here knocking on 24/7.  Can someone help me?

[jassi]

Criminal defamation differs from civil defamation, so the two aren't the same LOL. Perhaps a complaint about Wolters has been made for all we know.

It seems the 'half a fingerprint' evidence in the Behan case is a journalistic invention. It's very difficult to decide which are 'known facts' and which are speculations, that's for sure.

It most certainly is.

Was this partial print actually attributed to Brueckner, or is it just that a print was found ?

[Eleanor]

It most certainly is.

Was this partial print actually attributed to Brueckner, or is it just that a print was found ?

An answer to this might help.  Thanks for asking.

[jassi]

Are we now saying that somedebody lied about this fingerprint in The Behan Case?  I have lost the plot again and I am here knocking on 24/7.  Can someone help me?

I doubt that police would openly admit they had his print even if they did have it.

[Eleanor]

I doubt that police would openly admit they had his print even if they did have it.

Almost certainly not.  So where did this information come from?

[Brietta]

I doubt that police would openly admit they had his print even if they did have it.

If they are at the stage of preparing charges the defence will be aware.

Action is being taken against the journalist only regarding the two dead dogs - absolutely nothing else - as far as I can see.